On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:52 AM, John David Anglin
wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
>> Having said that, if anybody has problems with this patch going in,
>> please speak out now rather than later.
>
> I very much appreciate the work you have done on this problem. However,
> the patch doesn't work as expect
Hi Martin,
> Having said that, if anybody has problems with this patch going in,
> please speak out now rather than later.
I very much appreciate the work you have done on this problem. However,
the patch doesn't work as expected. I get multiple comparison failures
with this change on hppa-unkn
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 06:39:10PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Martin Jambor writes:
>
> > I have run the testsuite on hppa with the following patch and I
> > successfully bootstrapped and tested it on x86_64. Unless someone
> > objects, I will bootstrap it on hppa and commit it in a week o
Martin Jambor writes:
> I have run the testsuite on hppa with the following patch and I
> successfully bootstrapped and tested it on x86_64. Unless someone
> objects, I will bootstrap it on hppa and commit it in a week or two
> along with Richi's patch verifying such decls don't leak to the IL
>
Hi,
we sometimes currently mess up when compiling callee-copied parameters
on architectures that use it (so, as far as I know, on hppa). The
manifestation of the issue is e.g. PR 40464 but I believe there maight
be others.
The real problem is that even though a comment in tree.h says that
declar
