Philipp Marek philipp at marek.priv.at writes:
gcc -S tmp.S for some reason prints to stdout, so gcc -S tmp.S tmp.s
is what you need
Thank you very much, I'll take a look.
I tried very hard to achieve that; and one time it seemed to work, but I cannot
make it work again.
As an example I'm
Ph. Marek phil...@marek.priv.at writes:
Philipp Marek philipp at marek.priv.at writes:
gcc -S tmp.S for some reason prints to stdout, so gcc -S tmp.S tmp.s
is what you need
Thank you very much, I'll take a look.
I tried very hard to achieve that; and one time it seemed to work, but I
gcc -S tmp.S for some reason prints to stdout, so gcc -S tmp.S tmp.s
is what you need
Thank you very much, I'll take a look.
Regards,
Phil
--
Versioning your /etc, /home or even your whole installation?
Try fsvs (fsvs.tigris.org)!
Hello everybody,
I already asked that on gcc-help@ but got no answer, so I'm trying again here.
I'm looking for a way to get inbetween the assembler macro processor and the
assembler.
I'd like to get the assembler sources mostly as-is, but with the macros used
therein already expanded.
I've
you could run cpp on it by itself, or I suspect gcc -S tmp.s will also
work, im in a rush though cant test this.
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Philipp Marek phil...@marek.priv.at wrote:
Hello everybody,
I already asked that on gcc-help@ but got no answer, so I'm trying again here.
I'm
gcc -S tmp.S for some reason prints to stdout, so gcc -S tmp.S tmp.s
is what you need
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Carl carlchatfi...@gmail.com wrote:
you could run cpp on it by itself, or I suspect gcc -S tmp.s will also
work, im in a rush though cant test this.
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at
Philipp Marek phil...@marek.priv.at writes:
I already asked that on gcc-help@ but got no answer, so I'm trying again here.
Sorry, this is the wrong mailing list, and so is gcc-help.
gcc@gcc.gnu.org is for discussion of development of gcc. You are asking
a question about the assembler. The
