On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 09:29:08AM +0800, Fengwei Yin wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> Thanks for your information. I will ask for help on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, great.
> But I still have question about gcc here:
Um, you're still here? Please don't ask more questions here.
Your questions reveal that you a
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your information. I will ask for help on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But I still have question about gcc here:
The Local variables layout will impact my development. Consider
following C code:
my_test()
{
int i;
int j;
char c[7];
int *tmp;
tmp = (int *)
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 07:58, Fengwei Yin wrote:
> int my_temp(void)
> {
> int i;
> int j;
> char str[2];
>
> Please notice the address of the str and j. there IS NO memory hole
> between therm
> when using gcc 3.4.3 and there IS memory hole when using gcc 4.1. My question
> is:
Hi,
When enable the gcc 4.1 with EABI support for ARM, I met such situation about
the alignment.
Here is my test case:
#include
#include
struct test {
char c1;
long long n;
char c2;
};
int my_temp(void)
{
int i;
int j;
char str[2];
lon
