Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Joseph Myers : > In practice there are a lot of ways people have messed up ChangeLog > commits or commit messages that I would expect to confuse such author > extraction, even before you get to the parts of the history converted from > CVS. This is also true. I looked

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > I strongly recomend that if you want to try this, you separate it from the > initial repo conversion. That is, get the project to git first. Then > see if you can data-mine author information out of the history. If, > and only if, you get results

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Joseph Myers : > This is still hypothetical, since I haven't seen any scripts posted that > would actual implement this, or any resulting mappings of commits, and one > wouldn't normally expect a repository conversion to attempt to distinguish > committer from author

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > My view is: contributors are free to specify what name and email address > > they want used, but if they want something other than a single name and > > email address for the whole commit history with a given username, it's the > > contributor's

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 7 October 2016 at 22:26, Joseph Myers wrote: >> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >>> FWIW, I thought at one point the consensus was that the mailmap would >>> expand only to $use...@gcc.gnu.org rather

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 7 October 2016 at 22:26, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >> FWIW, I thought at one point the consensus was that the mailmap would >> expand only to $use...@gcc.gnu.org rather than $userid@$organization, >> esp. considering the case where there is no single

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > joseph wrote: > > > Thanks, here are further authors map additions for new committers. > > [...] > > avieira = Andre Vieira > > [...] > > FWIW, I thought at one point the consensus was that the mailmap would > expand

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

joseph wrote: > Thanks, here are further authors map additions for new committers. > [...] > avieira = Andre Vieira > [...] FWIW, I thought at one point the consensus was that the mailmap would expand only to $use...@gcc.gnu.org rather than

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Jason Merrill wrote: > But if you want to do it with reposurgeon, I won't complain. I've > pushed my WIP to https://github.com/jicama/gcc-reposurgeon Thanks, here are further authors map additions for new committers. avieira = Andre Vieira

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Jason Merrill wrote: > no additional commits, and keeps other branches that were deleted in > SVN, though I was able to work around this with a postprocessing > script. I suppose there's the question of what we want cases where branches might have been deleted to look like,

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Jason Merrill : > > I've used both git-svn (sometimes with git filter-branch) and reposurgeon > > for repository conversions. My experience is that if there's anything at > > all complicated or messy about the history, using git-svn for the > > conversion is not a good idea, so

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Jason Merrill wrote: > >> After I ran into a couple of reposurgeon bugs and didn't hear back >> from you, I started investigating rewriting the existing git svn >> mirror with git filter-branch

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Jason Merrill writes: > [...] gcc.gnu.org already refuses git connections fairly frequently > due to overloading [...] With the corresponding reduction in cpu load from svn users, plus the ready adjustability of those xinetd thresholds, please don't let that hold you back. -

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Jason Merrill wrote: > After I ran into a couple of reposurgeon bugs and didn't hear back > from you, I started investigating rewriting the existing git svn > mirror with git filter-branch instead. That seems an attractive > option, but not long afterward I needed to shift

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Joseph Myers : >> On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Eric S. Raymond wrote: >> >> > I thought the gcc conversion was done. >> > >> > I can make the repository available again if it's needed. >> >> The conversion

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Joseph Myers : > On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > > > I thought the gcc conversion was done. > > > > I can make the repository available again if it's needed. > > The conversion got stalled (I'm not sure why; maybe just Jason being busy > with other things)

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > I thought the gcc conversion was done. > > I can make the repository available again if it's needed. The conversion got stalled (I'm not sure why; maybe just Jason being busy with other things) but is still intended (I'm not sure for when), so yes

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Joseph Myers : > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > > > I've made it available at: > > > > http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git > > What happened with this repository? Is it somewhere else now? Pulling in > my clone of

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > I've made it available at: > > http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git What happened with this repository? Is it somewhere else now? Pulling in my clone of git://thyrsus.com/repositories/gcc-conversion.git has produced "thyrsus.com[0:

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Richard Biener : > Not sure why we can't label the individual commits with Authors scraped > from the ChangeLog entries in that commit. Some commits even have > multiple authors after all! And if that fails I'd rather use the @gcc.gnu.org > identity. Because

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Richard Biener : >> Not sure why we can't label the individual commits with Authors scraped >> from the ChangeLog entries in that commit. Some commits even have >> multiple authors after all!

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Richard Biener : > Maybe I'm missing sth but apart from the CVS imported revisions each > SVN revision should contain the actual change plus the changes to the > ChangeLog files (you can't count on the commit message itself I guess > as not all people replicate the

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:57 AM, DJ Delorie wrote: > > "Frank Ch. Eigler" writes: >> That makes sense, but how many people are in cagney's shoes > > I am one of those people - I have two email addresses listed in > MAINTAINERS, with two sets of copyright papers

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 09/17/2015 10:24 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: [ snip ] No, I'm not going to do that work; and personally, I don't think it's worth holding up the switch to wait for that to be done. Agreed. Jeff

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Hi, On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > None of this has any chance of working for any commits to the pre-egcs > sources. In those days there was no version control on the ChangeLog > file. > > My feeling is we could spend months ratholing on this particular problem > rather than

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 17/09/15 16:15, Michael Matz wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > >> All I can say is every time I've tried this it's been a nightmare, and >> when you say "apart from CVS imported revisions" my hair stands on end. >> And the GCC history is two and a half times

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 17/09/15 17:08, Michael Matz wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > >> None of this has any chance of working for any commits to the pre-egcs >> sources. In those days there was no version control on the ChangeLog >> file. >> >> My feeling is we could spend months

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Hi, On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > All I can say is every time I've tried this it's been a nightmare, and > when you say "apart from CVS imported revisions" my hair stands on end. > And the GCC history is two and a half times the size of the next largest > repo I've tried this

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Michael Matz : > I don't see why the problems with some ranges of commits should prevent us > doing better for those ranges where there are no such problems. I thought > reposurgeon (I haven't looked at it) had the ability to postprocess > commits and dig out additional info, and

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Richard Earnshaw : > Well if that's the case then someone ought to be able to produce a meta > file that could be supplied to Eric, that looked something like > > $SVN: r > $Committer: > $Author:... > $Author:... > $Author:... > ... > > $SVN:... > $Committer: >

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Richard Biener writes: >> Using d...@gcc.gnu.org would imply that is my email address, but email >> sent there would vanish. > > Would it? You're supposed to have a valid forwarding address on that. Frank tested it and it does seem to forward to me, so I guess so.

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 09/16/2015 09:26 AM, Andrew Cagney wrote: On 15 September 2015 at 21:36, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: cagney = Andrew Cagney cag...@gnu.org? Good point. The email identities of people change over time; forcing a single arbitrary one to label all

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 15 September 2015 at 21:36, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > >>> cagney = Andrew Cagney >> cag...@gnu.org? > > Good point. The email identities of people change over time; forcing > a single arbitrary one to label all contributions is at best imprecise > and at

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Hi - > [...] > >- rewrite history - use some totally arbitrary, and quickly outdated, > >internet identity > I think this is main reason why @gnu.org or @gmail.com style addresses > are preferred over employer addresses when there's > 1 address on file. That makes sense, but how many people

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

"Frank Ch. Eigler" writes: > That makes sense, but how many people are in cagney's shoes I am one of those people - I have two email addresses listed in MAINTAINERS, with two sets of copyright papers filed with the FSF (a personal assignment and a work one). I use the

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Hi - > >> [...] >> >- rewrite history - use some totally arbitrary, and quickly outdated, >> >internet identity > >> I think this is main reason why @gnu.org or @gmail.com style addresses >> are preferred over employer

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 09/16/2015 11:21 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: Hi - [...] - rewrite history - use some totally arbitrary, and quickly outdated, internet identity I think this is main reason why @gnu.org or @gmail.com style

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

>> cagney = Andrew Cagney > cag...@gnu.org? Good point. The email identities of people change over time; forcing a single arbitrary one to label all contributions is at best imprecise and at worse a miscrediting. (This is one way in which the impersonal use...@gcc.gnu.org

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 28 August 2015 at 13:24, Jeff Law wrote: > cagney = Andrew Cagney cag...@gnu.org?

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

"Eric S. Raymond" writes: > I've made it available at: > > http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git > > The interesting content is gcc.map (the contributor map) and gcc.lift. The current entry ro = Rainer Orth lists my old email

RE: Repository for the conversion machinery

Hi, Current email address for Xuepeng Guo is terry@arm.com Best regards, Thomas > -Original Message- > From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On > Behalf Of Eric S. Raymond > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 10:38 PM > To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Repository

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Rainer Orth : > The current entry > > ro = Rainer Orth > > lists my old email address. Please use r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de > instead. Done. -- http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:50:53 + Joseph Myers wrote: > shinwell = Mark Shinwell > (Jane Street) Mark's current address is mshinw...@janestreet.com. Julian

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

There's at least one case of a contributor who changed their name where you have the old name instead of the new one: Richard Guenther - Richard Biener. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 10:38 -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote: I've made it available at: http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git The interesting content is gcc.map (the contributor map) and gcc.lift. Presently the only command in gcc.lift expunges the hooks directory. From your

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Peter Bergner berg...@vnet.ibm.com: On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 10:38 -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote: I've made it available at: http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git The interesting content is gcc.map (the contributor map) and gcc.lift. Presently the only command in gcc.lift

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

All the cygnus.com addresses are out of date. More current replacements for a few: echristo = Eric Christopher echri...@gmail.com merrill = Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com (if someone appears with multiple usernames, probably make their address consistent for all of them unless

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Eric S. Raymond wrote: Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com: There's at least one case of a contributor who changed their name where you have the old name instead of the new one: Richard Guenther - Richard Biener. Is rguenth = Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Jeff Law l...@redhat.com: Given that I worked for Cygnus and still work with Red Hat, I can make a pass over all the @cygnus.com addresses and probably give something more up-to-date for most of them if that's useful. That would be *very* useful. -- a

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Peter Bergner berg...@vnet.ibm.com: jgrimm = Jon Grimm jgri...@us.ibm.com Jon is now at Canonical. I'm not sure which of the two email addresses that seem to be active for him he prefers: jon.gr...@canonical.com jon.gr...@gmail.com I'll go wit the gmail one unless he tells

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 08/28/2015 09:26 AM, Joseph Myers wrote: All the cygnus.com addresses are out of date. More current replacements for a few: echristo = Eric Christopher echri...@gmail.com merrill = Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com (if someone appears with multiple usernames, probably make their address

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

azanella = Adhemerval Zanella azane...@linux.vnet.ibm.com Adhemerval now works for Linaro, so his email address should be: adhemerval.zane...@linaro.org bje = Ben Elliston b...@redhat.com Ben is no longer at Red Hat...or IBM. He went back to school and his new email address seems

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com: There's at least one case of a contributor who changed their name where you have the old name instead of the new one: Richard Guenther - Richard Biener. Is rguenth = Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de correct? -- a

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com: (if someone appears with multiple usernames, probably make their address consistent for all of them unless specifically requested otherwise) I am attemoting to do that. -- a href=http://www.catb.org/~esr/;Eric S. Raymond/a

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On August 28, 2015 5:02:39 PM GMT+02:00, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote: Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com: There's at least one case of a contributor who changed their name where you have the old name instead of the new one: Richard Guenther - Richard Biener. Is rguenth =

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 08/28/2015 09:57 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote: Jeff Law l...@redhat.com: Given that I worked for Cygnus and still work with Red Hat, I can make a pass over all the @cygnus.com addresses and probably give something more up-to-date for most of them if that's useful. That would be *very* useful.

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 11:00 -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote: Peter Bergner berg...@vnet.ibm.com: On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 10:38 -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote: I've made it available at: http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git The interesting content is gcc.map (the contributor

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com: FWIW, updates for some out-of-date codesourcery.com addresses: dgutson = Daniel Gutson daniel.gut...@tallertechnologies.com mmitchel = Mark Mitchell mark.patrick.mitch...@gmail.com mmitchell = Mark Mitchell mark.patrick.mitch...@gmail.com pbrook = Paul

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

FWIW, updates for some out-of-date codesourcery.com addresses: dgutson = Daniel Gutson daniel.gut...@tallertechnologies.com mmitchel = Mark Mitchell mark.patrick.mitch...@gmail.com mmitchell = Mark Mitchell mark.patrick.mitch...@gmail.com pbrook = Paul Brook p...@nowt.org (don't know if it's

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Peter Bergner berg...@vnet.ibm.com: On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 11:00 -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote: Peter Bergner berg...@vnet.ibm.com: On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 10:38 -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote: I've made it available at: http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git The

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Jeff Law l...@redhat.com: Here's my stab at all the @cygnus.com and @redhat.com addresses. There's several I lost track of through the years. Would you please resend this as a contrib map with the updated addresses in it? I find that when I hand-edit these in I make too many cut'n'paste

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:24:30AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: abalkiss = Anthony Balkissoon abalk...@redhat.com No clue on this one, not with Red Hat anymore. aluchko = Aaron Luchko aluc...@redhat.com Grad Student at University of Alberta. djee = David Jee d...@redhat.com No clue. Not with

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 08/28/2015 12:29 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote: Jeff Law l...@redhat.com: Here's my stab at all the @cygnus.com and @redhat.com addresses. There's several I lost track of through the years. Would you please resend this as a contrib map with the updated addresses in it? I find that when I

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote: trix = Tom Rix t...@redhat.com Not with Red Hat anymore. No idea where he is now. Tom now works for Juniper Networks. A recent email address is: trix = Tom Rix tc...@bellsouth.net - David

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Eric S. Raymond wrote: FX fxcoud...@gmail.com: [context for the Fortran list: the svn repo is about to be converted into a git repo, which will be the official gcc repo onwards] Hi Eric, I realize that some of our Fortran maintainers (and committers) are not

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 27/08/15 17:16, Eric S. Raymond wrote: Paulo Matos pmatos@linki.tools: On 27/08/15 16:56, Paulo Matos wrote: I noticed I am not on the list (check commit r225509, user pmatos) either. And thanks for your help on this transition. r188804 | mkuvyrkov ma...@codesourcery.com for

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com: On 8/27/2015 11:03 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote: Paulo Matos pmatos@linki.tools: I noticed I am not on the list (check commit r225509, user pmatos) either. And thanks for your help on this transition. I've added you to the map. I will pile

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

273 missing usernames (this is based on grepping the output of svn log on an rsync mirror of the repository, so it's possible one or two could be spurious, but should be pretty accurate). I've made no attempt to map these to emails yet. aaw abalkiss abel abennett abutcher acsawdey aesok

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

[context for the Fortran list: the svn repo is about to be converted into a git repo, which will be the official gcc repo onwards] Hi Eric, I realize that some of our Fortran maintainers (and committers) are not listed in the map file: Fortran Janne Blomqvist

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com: A lot of the e-mail addresses are out of date, as you know. Would it be helpful to get updated e-mail addresses, or does it not really matter? Updated addresses are better. In gcc.map I see anoncvs = Anonymous CVS User anon...@gcc.gnu.org Are there

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com: For example: r225805 | jb | 2015-07-15 00:00:23 -0700 (Wed, 15 Jul 2015) | 9 lines OK. This means the map is not yet complete. It will be very helpful if you can send me as many missing entries as you notice - that is, pairs of Subversion IDs and

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 27/08/15 16:56, Paulo Matos wrote: I noticed I am not on the list (check commit r225509, user pmatos) either. And thanks for your help on this transition. r188804 | mkuvyrkov ma...@codesourcery.com for example. -- Paulo Matos

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 27/08/15 16:56, James Greenhalgh wrote: On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 03:38:10PM +0100, Eric S. Raymond wrote: I've made it available at: http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git The interesting content is gcc.map (the contributor map) and gcc.lift. Presently the only command in gcc.lift

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com: 273 missing usernames (this is based on grepping the output of svn log on an rsync mirror of the repository, so it's possible one or two could be spurious, but should be pretty accurate). I've made no attempt to map these to emails yet. Jason

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 27/08/15 17:42, Eric S. Raymond wrote: Richard Earnshaw richard.earns...@foss.arm.com: On 27/08/15 17:03, Richard Earnshaw wrote: On 27/08/15 16:48, Eric S. Raymond wrote: If the former, then I don't know why they're not in the map. It contains an entry for every distinct Unix username

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

FX fxcoud...@gmail.com: [context for the Fortran list: the svn repo is about to be converted into a git repo, which will be the official gcc repo onwards] Hi Eric, I realize that some of our Fortran maintainers (and committers) are not listed in the map file: Fortran

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 03:38:10PM +0100, Eric S. Raymond wrote: I've made it available at: http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git The interesting content is gcc.map (the contributor map) and gcc.lift. Presently the only command in gcc.lift expunges the hooks directory. This

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 27/08/15 16:48, Eric S. Raymond wrote: If the former, then I don't know why they're not in the map. It contains an entry for every distinct Unix username it could extract. What usernames should I expect these people to have? Those aren't the only ones. Just looking at the SVN log for

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Paulo Matos pmatos@linki.tools: I noticed I am not on the list (check commit r225509, user pmatos) either. And thanks for your help on this transition. I've added you to the map. -- a href=http://www.catb.org/~esr/;Eric S. Raymond/a

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

FX fxcoud...@gmail.com: PS: I found one username that first escaped my scripts because it contained a period, so I am raising a flag here, so the same doesn’t happen to you: m.hayes (commit 34779). I have that one, thanks. -- a href=http://www.catb.org/~esr/;Eric S.

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com: On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote: Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com: Where someone is listed in MAINTAINERS, I suggest preferring that email address over any older address you may have got from ChangeLogs etc.

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 27/08/15 17:03, Richard Earnshaw wrote: On 27/08/15 16:48, Eric S. Raymond wrote: If the former, then I don't know why they're not in the map. It contains an entry for every distinct Unix username it could extract. What usernames should I expect these people to have? Those aren't

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 08/27/2015 10:04 AM, FX wrote: If the former, then I don't know why they're not in the map. In fact, I can look at the output of “svn log” for the MAINTAINERS file, which probably almost everyone with commit rights has modified. This contains 442 usernames, compared to the map’s 290. And

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote: Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com: Where someone is listed in MAINTAINERS, I suggest preferring that email address over any older address you may have got from ChangeLogs etc. (unless they're requested otherwise or it

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 27/08/15 16:48, Eric S. Raymond wrote: FX fxcoud...@gmail.com: [context for the Fortran list: the svn repo is about to be converted into a git repo, which will be the official gcc repo onwards] Hi Eric, I realize that some of our Fortran maintainers (and committers) are not listed in

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

FX fxcoud...@gmail.com: FortranJanne Blomqvist j...@gcc.gnu.org FortranTobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de FortranDaniel Franke franke.dan...@gmail.com FortranDaniel Kraft

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Where someone is listed in MAINTAINERS, I suggest preferring that email address over any older address you may have got from ChangeLogs etc. (unless they're requested otherwise or it seems the MAINTAINERS address is the one that hasn't been kept up to date). For example, for Roland McGrath,

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com: Where someone is listed in MAINTAINERS, I suggest preferring that email address over any older address you may have got from ChangeLogs etc. (unless they're requested otherwise or it seems the MAINTAINERS address is the one that hasn't been kept up to

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Fortran Janne Blomqvist j...@gcc.gnu.org Fortran Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de Fortran Daniel Franke franke.dan...@gmail.com Fortran Daniel Kraftd...@domob.eu Fortran

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com: On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: In gcc.map I see anoncvs = Anonymous CVS User anon...@gcc.gnu.org Are there any actual commits by this user? r17330, a test commit on 1998-01-13. Presumably the test was followed by fixing

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

If the former, then I don't know why they're not in the map. In fact, I can look at the output of “svn log” for the MAINTAINERS file, which probably almost everyone with commit rights has modified. This contains 442 usernames, compared to the map’s 290. And there are probably more, which we’ll

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Paulo Matos pmatos@linki.tools: On 27/08/15 16:56, Paulo Matos wrote: I noticed I am not on the list (check commit r225509, user pmatos) either. And thanks for your help on this transition. r188804 | mkuvyrkov ma...@codesourcery.com for example. Do you know a full name for this

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: In gcc.map I see anoncvs = Anonymous CVS User anon...@gcc.gnu.org Are there any actual commits by this user? r17330, a test commit on 1998-01-13. Presumably the test was followed by fixing whatever bug allowed it. -- Joseph S. Myers

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 08/27/2015 10:16 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote: Paulo Matos pmatos@linki.tools: On 27/08/15 16:56, Paulo Matos wrote: I noticed I am not on the list (check commit r225509, user pmatos) either. And thanks for your help on this transition. r188804 | mkuvyrkov ma...@codesourcery.com Maxim

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 27/08/15 17:20, Richard Earnshaw wrote: On 27/08/15 17:16, Eric S. Raymond wrote: Paulo Matos pmatos@linki.tools: On 27/08/15 16:56, Paulo Matos wrote: I noticed I am not on the list (check commit r225509, user pmatos) either. And thanks for your help on this transition. r188804 |

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote: I've made it available at: http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git The interesting content is gcc.map (the contributor map) and gcc.lift. Presently the only command in gcc.lift expunges the hooks directory.

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

On 8/27/2015 11:03 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote: Paulo Matos pmatos@linki.tools: I noticed I am not on the list (check commit r225509, user pmatos) either. And thanks for your help on this transition. I've added you to the map. I will pile on. I may be in the history under at least three

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com: On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 03:38:10PM +0100, Eric S. Raymond wrote: I've made it available at: http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git The interesting content is gcc.map (the contributor map) and gcc.lift. Presently the only command

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

Richard Earnshaw richard.earns...@foss.arm.com: On 27/08/15 17:03, Richard Earnshaw wrote: On 27/08/15 16:48, Eric S. Raymond wrote: If the former, then I don't know why they're not in the map. It contains an entry for every distinct Unix username it could extract. What usernames

Re: Repository for the conversion machinery

DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com: Hmmm... I use two email addresses for commits, depending on which target they're for, i.e.: $ grep DJ MAINTAINERS m32c port DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com DJGPP DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com Most of the

  1   2   >