Re: Code performance regression between gcc 4.5 and 4.6

2011-01-04 Thread Martin Reinecke
On 01/04/11 15:10, H.J. Lu wrote: We need a testcase to investigate. This is now PR47167. Cheers, Martin

Re: Code performance regression between gcc 4.5 and 4.6

2011-01-04 Thread H.J. Lu
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Martin Reinecke wrote: > > > On 01/04/11 14:48, H.J. Lu wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Martin Reinecke >>  wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> while benchmarking a numerical C library making heavy use of SSE2 >>> intrinsics, I have noticed a significant (aroun

Re: Code performance regression between gcc 4.5 and 4.6

2011-01-04 Thread Martin Reinecke
On 01/04/11 14:48, H.J. Lu wrote: On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Martin Reinecke wrote: Hi, while benchmarking a numerical C library making heavy use of SSE2 intrinsics, I have noticed a significant (around 10 percent) slowdown in the code generated by the current gcc trunk, compared to th

Re: Code performance regression between gcc 4.5 and 4.6

2011-01-04 Thread H.J. Lu
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Martin Reinecke wrote: > Hi, > > while benchmarking a numerical C library making heavy use of SSE2 > intrinsics, I have noticed a significant (around 10 percent) slowdown > in the code generated by the current gcc trunk, compared to the one > produced by the 4.5.1 r