Terry writes:
> Posting here rather than gcc.help since I consider this behaviour to
> be a bug.
The right place is still gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org. That is the mailing list
for all discussions about using GCC, as opposed to discussions about how
to change GCC.
> When I step through the function "r
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
You neglected to mention which version of gcc you were using, or which
target. The description and test case sound like GCC PR 9997:
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9997
which was fixed for the 4.0 release.
Sorry, I'm using GCC 3.4.4, haven't tested on 4.0.X.
I saw the PR 9997,
Hanzac Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some idea: Maybe local stack use in the code compiled by GCC should be
> optimized 'cause some local variables are conditional. If the condition
> is not satisfied, then these variables don't need to be allocated from
> the stack (e.g. sub $VAR_SIZE, %esp)
