On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan and Richard,
Are either of you aware of the gcc.dg/vect/vect-67.c failure that is
occuring on some platforms? I see it on IA64 (Linux and HP-UX) but a
scan of the gcc-testresults mailing lists shows failures on x86_64
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan and Richard,
Are either of you aware of the gcc.dg/vect/vect-67.c failure that is
occuring on some platforms? I see it on IA64 (Linux and HP-UX) but a
scan of the gcc-testresults mailing lists shows failures on
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 11:29 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
Do we have a bug for these FAILs? Maybe we should add the analysis that
happened sofar.
Richard.
I have created PR 37853.
Steve Ellcey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am still looking into this, it's on my stack of PRE weirdness :)
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 11:29 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
Do we have a bug for these FAILs? Maybe we should add the analysis that
happened sofar.
Dan and Richard,
Are either of you aware of the gcc.dg/vect/vect-67.c failure that is
occuring on some platforms? I see it on IA64 (Linux and HP-UX) but a
scan of the gcc-testresults mailing lists shows failures on x86_64 and
powerpc as well.
Looking into the failure, I see that it started (at
