Re: Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-14 Thread Jim Wilson
Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: PS. No, I don't know why the simple some search terms doesn't work. Probably because simple search only looks at the summary field (and a few other usually useless fields), and the summary field often doesn't have the info you are searching for. If you click on the

Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-12 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
Hi! Since r110852, GCC (used as cross-compiler) can no longer build uClibc or (parts of) GNU libc: +2006-02-10 Zdenek Dvorak [EMAIL PROTECTED] + + * doc/invoke.texi (-floop-optimize2): Removed. + * toplev.c (process_options): Remove handling of flag_loop_optimize2. + *

Re: Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-12 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Feb 12, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: Hi! Since r110852, GCC (used as cross-compiler) can no longer build uClibc or (parts of) GNU libc: +2006-02-10 Zdenek Dvorak [EMAIL PROTECTED] + + * doc/invoke.texi (-floop-optimize2): Removed. + * toplev.c (process_options):

Re: Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-12 Thread Zdenek Dvorak
Hello, Since r110852, GCC (used as cross-compiler) can no longer build uClibc or (parts of) GNU libc: +2006-02-10 Zdenek Dvorak [EMAIL PROTECTED] + + * doc/invoke.texi (-floop-optimize2): Removed. + * toplev.c (process_options): Remove handling of flag_loop_optimize2. +

Re: Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-12 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Sun, 2006-02-12 15:26:40 -0500, Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 12, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: Since r110852, GCC (used as cross-compiler) can no longer build uClibc or (parts of) GNU libc: +2006-02-10 Zdenek Dvorak [EMAIL PROTECTED] + + *

Re: Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-12 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Feb 12, 2006, at 3:33 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: First of all: thanks. You're ultimatively fast. And now: How do you actually find the PRs? I seem to wrongly use Bugzilla's search engine. I submitted int_mode_for_mode into the Enter a bug # or some search terms box of

Re: Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-12 Thread David Fang
And now: How do you actually find the PRs? I seem to wrongly use Bugzilla's search engine. I submitted int_mode_for_mode into the Enter a bug # or some search terms box of http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ , which didn't find anything. I don't really feel like wasting your time with doing

Re: Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-12 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, David Fang wrote: And now: How do you actually find the PRs? I seem to wrongly use Bugzilla's search engine. I submitted int_mode_for_mode into the Enter a bug # or some search terms box of http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ , which didn't find anything. I don't

Re: Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-12 Thread David Daney
Andrew Pinski wrote: On Feb 12, 2006, at 3:33 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: First of all: thanks. You're ultimatively fast. And now: How do you actually find the PRs? I seem to wrongly use Bugzilla's search engine. I submitted int_mode_for_mode into the Enter a bug # or some search terms