Kaveh R. Ghazi gh...@caip.rutgers.edu writes:
Agreed. I guess my remaining questions are for AIX and mipsisa64-elf.
Can someone please confirm that mipsisa64-elf is a cross-compile-only target
and therefore not relevant for host-based MPC portability testing?
Yes, that's right.
I'm sure
From: Mark Mitchell m...@codesourcery.com
Richard Guenther wrote:
If config.gcc handles both triples the same (*-*-solaris2.10 and
*-*-solaris2.11) then we can consider both at the same level.
Indeed. Furthermore, we certainly wouldn't want to break support for
Solaris 2.10 at this point,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Kaveh R. Ghazi gh...@caip.rutgers.edu wrote:
And do we want to update aix5.2 to aix5.3 in our platforms list?
AIX should be updated to 5.3 or 6.1.
David
From: David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Kaveh R. Ghazi gh...@caip.rutgers.edu
wrote:
And do we want to update aix5.2 to aix5.3 in our platforms list?
AIX should be updated to 5.3 or 6.1.
David
For the last two months or so, the AIX reports I see are
Richard Guenther wrote:
If config.gcc handles both triples the same (*-*-solaris2.10 and
*-*-solaris2.11) then we can consider both at the same level.
Indeed. Furthermore, we certainly wouldn't want to break support for
Solaris 2.10 at this point, so having 2.10 listed seems to make sense to
Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com writes:
I was looking through the gcc-4.5 primary and secondary platform list
to ensure we have coverage for MPC testing. It occurs to me that some
of the OS versions are outdated.
I've included the list from the page
Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com writes:
I was looking through the gcc-4.5 primary and secondary platform list
to ensure we have coverage for MPC testing. It occurs to me that some
of the OS versions are outdated.
I've included the list from the page
Dennis Clarke writes:
Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com writes:
I was looking through the gcc-4.5 primary and secondary platform list
to ensure we have coverage for MPC testing. It occurs to me that some
of the OS versions are outdated.
I've included the list from the page
you can buy a support contract for it then you have a valid platform in
commercial use.
You can get support for the OpenSolaris distribution if you like
I just went and looked ... you are correct, they have three levels in
fact. It looks like $1080 for premium, $720 is standard business
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org wrote:
you can buy a support contract for it then you have a valid platform in
commercial use.
You can get support for the OpenSolaris distribution if you like
I just went and looked ... you are correct, they have three
I was looking through the gcc-4.5 primary and secondary platform list
to ensure we have coverage for MPC testing. It occurs to me that some
of the OS versions are outdated.
I've included the list from the page
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/criteria.html
Should we update:
1. solaris2.10 - 2.11
2.
I was looking through the gcc-4.5 primary and secondary platform list
to ensure we have coverage for MPC testing. It occurs to me that some
of the OS versions are outdated.
I've included the list from the page
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/criteria.html
Should we update:
1. solaris2.10 -
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
2. i386-unknown-freebsd and i686-apple-darwin are generic, but
config.guess will supply specific version numbers. What version
should MPC be shown to work on? Any one of them would do?
For FreeBSD, I'd specify versions 6.x and above. Older versions
13 matches
Mail list logo
