Re: dejagnu version update?

On 09/16/2015 10:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: On 16/09/15 17:14, Mike Stump wrote: On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: Mike Stump writes: The software presently works with 1.4.4 and there aren’t any changes that require

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 09/16/2015 10:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: On 16/09/15 17:14, Mike Stump wrote: On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: Mike Stump writes: The software presently works with 1.4.4 and there aren’t any changes that require

Re: dejagnu version update?

On September 16, 2015 7:39:42 PM GMT+02:00, David Malcolm wrote: >On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 10:36 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 09/16/2015 10:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 16/09/15 17:14, Mike Stump wrote: >> >> On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Schwab

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Sep 16, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > > Sorry about the obvious (possibly dumb) question. > Can't we just import a copy of dejagnu each year and install it as part of > the source tree? TL;DR: No. We could, and indeed, some people do

Re: dejagnu version update?

On September 16, 2015 7:39:42 PM GMT+02:00, David Malcolm wrote: >On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 10:36 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 09/16/2015 10:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 16/09/15 17:14, Mike Stump wrote: >> >> On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Schwab

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Sep 16, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > > Sorry about the obvious (possibly dumb) question. > Can't we just import a copy of dejagnu each year and install it as part of > the source tree? TL;DR: No. We could, and indeed, some people do

Re: dejagnu version update?

On September 16, 2015 7:57:03 PM GMT+02:00, Mike Stump wrote: >On Sep 16, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan > wrote: >> >> Sorry about the obvious (possibly dumb) question. > >> Can't we just import a copy of dejagnu each year and

Re: dejagnu version update?

On September 16, 2015 7:57:03 PM GMT+02:00, Mike Stump wrote: >On Sep 16, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan > wrote: >> >> Sorry about the obvious (possibly dumb) question. > >> Can't we just import a copy of dejagnu each year and

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 01:39:42PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > AIUI, we specifically need >= 1.5.3 (or a version with a backport) to > get support for multiple load_lib paths mentioned by Bernhard, which is > what motivated this thread (on gcc-patches, before it spread to the gcc > list): We

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 01:39:42PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > AIUI, we specifically need >= 1.5.3 (or a version with a backport) to > get support for multiple load_lib paths mentioned by Bernhard, which is > what motivated this thread (on gcc-patches, before it spread to the gcc > list): We

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > On Sep 16, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan > wrote: >> >> Sorry about the obvious (possibly dumb) question. > >> Can't we just import a copy of dejagnu each year and install it

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > On Sep 16, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan > wrote: >> >> Sorry about the obvious (possibly dumb) question. > >> Can't we just import a copy of dejagnu each year and install it

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > Where Joseph said he'd wait some more.. I had thought I asked longer ago than > that, time flies if one has fun. > > I'd just require 1.5.3 just to avoid the time needed by folks to workaround > those silly

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > Where Joseph said he'd wait some more.. I had thought I asked longer ago than > that, time flies if one has fun. > > I'd just require 1.5.3 just to avoid the time needed by folks to workaround > those silly

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:36:47AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/16/2015 10:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > > > > > >On 16/09/15 17:14, Mike Stump wrote: > >>On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Schwab > >>wrote: > >>>Mike Stump writes: > >>> >

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:36:47AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/16/2015 10:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > > > > > >On 16/09/15 17:14, Mike Stump wrote: > >>On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Schwab > >>wrote: > >>>Mike Stump writes: > >>> >

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 10:36 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/16/2015 10:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > > > > > > On 16/09/15 17:14, Mike Stump wrote: > >> On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Schwab > >> wrote: > >>> Mike Stump writes: > >>> > The

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 10:36 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/16/2015 10:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > > > > > > On 16/09/15 17:14, Mike Stump wrote: > >> On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Schwab > >> wrote: > >>> Mike Stump writes: > >>> > The

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Sep 15, 2015, at 1:04 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > Given we haven't updated the dejagnu reqs since ~2001, I think stepping > forward would be appropriate and I'd support moving all the way to 1.5.3 with > the expectation that we'll be on a cadence of no faster than 2 years going >

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Sep 15, 2015, at 1:04 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > Given we haven't updated the dejagnu reqs since ~2001, I think stepping > forward would be appropriate and I'd support moving all the way to 1.5.3 with > the expectation that we'll be on a cadence of no faster than 2 years going >

dejagnu version update?

On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required >> dejagnu version to allow for getting rid of all these superfluous >> load_gcc_lib? *blink* :) > I'd support that as a direction. > > Certainly dropping the 2001 version from our website in favor

dejagnu version update?

On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required >> dejagnu version to allow for getting rid of all these superfluous >> load_gcc_lib? *blink* :) > I'd support that as a direction. > > Certainly dropping the 2001 version from our website in favor

Re: dejagnu version update?

On September 15, 2015 7:39:39 PM GMT+02:00, Mike Stump wrote: >On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >>> Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required >>> dejagnu version to allow for getting rid of all these superfluous >>> load_gcc_lib? *blink* :) >> I'd

Re: dejagnu version update?

On September 15, 2015 7:39:39 PM GMT+02:00, Mike Stump wrote: >On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >>> Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required >>> dejagnu version to allow for getting rid of all these superfluous >>> load_gcc_lib? *blink* :) >> I'd

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 09/15/2015 01:23 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On September 15, 2015 7:39:39 PM GMT+02:00, Mike Stump wrote: On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required dejagnu version to allow for getting rid of all these

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 09/15/2015 01:23 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On September 15, 2015 7:39:39 PM GMT+02:00, Mike Stump wrote: On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required dejagnu version to allow for getting rid of all these

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 10:39 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > >> Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required > >> dejagnu version to allow for getting rid of all these superfluous > >> load_gcc_lib? *blink* :) > > I'd support that as a direction. > >

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 10:39 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > >> Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required > >> dejagnu version to allow for getting rid of all these superfluous > >> load_gcc_lib? *blink* :) > > I'd support that as a direction. > >

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 09/15/2015 01:21 PM, David Malcolm wrote: On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 10:39 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required dejagnu version to allow for getting rid of all these superfluous load_gcc_lib? *blink* :) I'd

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 09/15/2015 01:21 PM, David Malcolm wrote: On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 10:39 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required dejagnu version to allow for getting rid of all these superfluous load_gcc_lib? *blink* :) I'd

Re: dejagnu version update?

On September 15, 2015 10:05:27 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law wrote: >On 09/15/2015 01:21 PM, David Malcolm wrote: >> On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 10:39 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: >>> On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required >

Re: dejagnu version update?

On September 15, 2015 10:05:27 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law wrote: >On 09/15/2015 01:21 PM, David Malcolm wrote: >> On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 10:39 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: >>> On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required >

<    1   2