Re: distributing g++

2006-12-16 Thread Denis Vlasenko
On Friday 15 December 2006 22:30, Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote: Hi What are the standard practices with installing multiple versions of gcc on a system. I renamed this gcc to be gcc-4.1. However, it looks like it will still overwrite some files when I do 'make install'. Is this true? As far

Re: distributing g++

2006-12-16 Thread Denis Vlasenko
On Friday 15 December 2006 22:30, Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote: Hi What are the standard practices with installing multiple versions of gcc on a system. I renamed this gcc to be gcc-4.1. However, it looks like it will still overwrite some files when I do 'make install'. Is this true? As far

distributing g++

2006-12-15 Thread Bob Rossi
Hi, I've compiled g++ for mingw with, ../gcc-4.1.1/configure --prefix=/home/bobbybrasko/g++/prefixdir --host=mingw32 \ --target=mingw32 --program-prefix= \ --program-suffix=-4.1 --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as --enable-threads --disable-nls \ --enable-languages=c,c++

Re: distributing g++

2006-12-15 Thread Brian Dessent
Bob Rossi wrote: Since i've used a prefix, I'm assumming gcc wants to be installed where I told it to be. I'm wondering 2 things. It's not supposed to be that way. The toolchain is supposed to be relocatable for MinGW targets. I don't know if it currently is, but read the past threads on the

Re: distributing g++

2006-12-15 Thread Ferad Zyulkyarov
Hi What are the standard practices with installing multiple versions of gcc on a system. I renamed this gcc to be gcc-4.1. However, it looks like it will still overwrite some files when I do 'make install'. Is this true? As far as I know, make install does not overwrite any files if there is

Re: distributing g++

2006-12-15 Thread Bob Rossi
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:35:23PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote: Bob Rossi wrote: Since i've used a prefix, I'm assumming gcc wants to be installed where I told it to be. I'm wondering 2 things. It's not supposed to be that way. The toolchain is supposed to be relocatable for MinGW