Re: expected behavior for --with-cloog?

2010-03-27 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Jack, * Jack Howarth wrote on Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 01:13:16AM CET: While testing a patch to update the minimum version of cloog-ppl in gcc trunk... --- configure.ac(revision 157732) +++ configure.ac(working copy) @@ -1612,9 +1612,9 @@ if test x$with_cloog != xno

Re: expected behavior for --with-cloog?

2010-03-27 Thread Jack Howarth
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 07:56:14AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Jack, * Jack Howarth wrote on Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 01:13:16AM CET: While testing a patch to update the minimum version of cloog-ppl in gcc trunk... --- configure.ac(revision 157732) +++ configure.ac

Re: expected behavior for --with-cloog?

2010-03-27 Thread Sebastian Pop
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:17, Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu wrote: On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 07:56:14AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Jack, * Jack Howarth wrote on Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 01:13:16AM CET:    While testing a patch to update the minimum version of cloog-ppl in gcc

expected behavior for --with-cloog?

2010-03-25 Thread Jack Howarth
While testing a patch to update the minimum version of cloog-ppl in gcc trunk... Index: configure.ac === --- configure.ac(revision 157732) +++ configure.ac(working copy) @@ -1612,9 +1612,9 @@ if test x$with_cloog