On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26 April 2013 13:09, Jurgis Upenieks wrote:
I think that I have found a bug in gcc home page gcc-4.7 changes.
In C++ paragraph about explicit override control.
In example code, is it really struct, not class?
Yes, that's valid C++, the example
On 2 June 2013 19:06, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26 April 2013 13:09, Jurgis Upenieks wrote:
I think that I have found a bug in gcc home page gcc-4.7 changes.
In C++ paragraph about explicit override control.
In example code, is it really struct
Hi,
I think that I have found a bug in gcc home page gcc-4.7 changes.
In C++ paragraph about explicit override control.
In example code, is it really struct, not class?
BR,
Jurgis
On 26 April 2013 13:09, Jurgis Upenieks wrote:
Hi,
I think that I have found a bug in gcc home page gcc-4.7 changes.
In C++ paragraph about explicit override control.
In example code, is it really struct, not class?
Yes, that's valid C++, the example is fine.