Re: gcc4, static array, SSE alignement

2005-04-06 Thread tbp
On Apr 6, 2005 3:18 AM, James E Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would guess a limitation of cygwin binutils support, or perhaps of Windows itself. Binutils, perhaps. Windows certainly not as msvc2k3 icc8.1 don't have such issue with the same code. This seems to work fine on linux. If I

Re: gcc4, static array, SSE alignement

2005-04-06 Thread tbp
On Apr 6, 2005 2:08 PM, tbp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll try to pinpoint the problem a bit better. Alas, since the other day the code using that static array has changed a bit and i can't reproduce the bug. So, after all, it really was gcc's fault. I'll try to dig up the original version.

Re: gcc4, static array, SSE alignement

2005-04-05 Thread James E Wilson
tbp wrote: Question: why do i get an unaligned array as soon as g++ (4.1.0 20050327, cygwin) finds out that it's static (i mean even if i try to fool it around a bit)? I would guess a limitation of cygwin binutils support, or perhaps of Windows itself. This seems to work fine on linux. If I