On 09/14/2010 04:29 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> INTMAX_TYPE is not currently defined for any target to use an extended
> integer type.
>
Thanks Joseph. Then I guess we can implement the proposed resolution
rather easily ;)
Paolo.
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> long long, by specifying that adds overloads for intmax_t
> only when the latter is an actual extended integer type, thus does not
> boil down to any standard integer type.
>
> I'm looking for help in figuring out whether this situation can really
> ha
Hi everyone,
I'm analyzing the proposed resolution of this issue:
http://wiki.dinkumware.com/twiki/pub/Wg21batavia/LibraryWorkingGroup/incomplete_spec_of_cinttypes.html
which tries to resolve a conflict with the abs and div overloads for
long long, by specifying that adds overloads for intm
