On 8 May 2018 at 15:45, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2018, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>> On 8 May 2018 at 14:00, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8 May 2018 at 13:44, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
I was recently bitten by the following issue (Linux, libstdc++ 8.0.1): A
process loads
On Tue, 8 May 2018, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 8 May 2018 at 14:00, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 8 May 2018 at 13:44, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
I was recently bitten by the following issue (Linux, libstdc++ 8.0.1): A
process loads two dynamic libraries A and B both using std::regex, and A is
compile
On 8 May 2018 at 14:00, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 8 May 2018 at 13:44, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>> I was recently bitten by the following issue (Linux, libstdc++ 8.0.1): A
>> process loads two dynamic libraries A and B both using std::regex, and A is
>> compiled without -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG while B is
On 8 May 2018 at 13:44, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> I was recently bitten by the following issue (Linux, libstdc++ 8.0.1): A
> process loads two dynamic libraries A and B both using std::regex, and A is
> compiled without -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG while B is compiled with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG.
This is only suppo
I was recently bitten by the following issue (Linux, libstdc++ 8.0.1):
A process loads two dynamic libraries A and B both using std::regex, and
A is compiled without -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG while B is compiled with
-D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG. B creates an instance of std::regex, which internally
creates a
std
