Tim Prince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17/06/2007 19:47:10:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Tim Prince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17/06/2007 04:15:56:
> >
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 06:54:46PM +0300, Dorit Nuzman wrote:
> > There are quite a few known simple
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Prince wrote:
There are several issues. EQUIVALENCE produces such a problem
(PR32373) as do various kinds of references to multiple sections of
the same array (PR32375,32376,32377,32378,32379,32380). Only 2 of
those PRs involve actual source/destination overlap,
Tim Prince wrote:
There are several issues. EQUIVALENCE produces such a problem (PR32373)
as do various kinds of references to multiple sections of the same array
(PR32375,32376,32377,32378,32379,32380). Only 2 of those PRs involve
actual source/destination overlap, where the vectorizer would
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Prince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17/06/2007 04:15:56:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 06:54:46PM +0300, Dorit Nuzman wrote:
There are quite a few known simple cases which vectorizer fails to
vectorize.
by "known" you mean there are open missed
