On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:05:06AM +0100, Michael_fogel wrote:
(define_insn iorsi3_internal1
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 gp_reg_operand =r,r)
(ior:SI (match_operand:SI 1 reg_or_0_operand %rJ,rJ)
(match_operand:SI 2 uns_arith_operand r,K)))]
Oh, by the way: A
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:05:06AM +0100, Michael_fogel wrote:
tcp_in.c:1133: internal compiler error: in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:771
Please submit a full bug report,
This means you're calling gen_reg_rtx() when you're not allowed to.
Olders version of GCC had a life1 pass, after which
On 16 November 2007 00:01, Jim Wilson wrote:
Michael_fogel wrote:
(ior:SI (subreg:SI (mem/s:QI (reg/f:SI 1250) [0
variable.flags+0 S1 A32]) 0)
See register_operand and general_operand in recog.c. (SUBREG (MEM)) is
accepted by register_operand if INSN_SCHEDULING is not defined, for
Dave Korn wrote:
First places to look would be GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS and
REG_OK_FOR_BASE_P, wouldn't they? Particularly in conjunction with
REG_OK_STRICT.
This could be a REG_OK_STRICT issue, but it isn't the usual case of
accepting an unallocated pseudo in reload, as we have a SUBREG
Hi
There is again a problem i con not solve by my own. I tried to compile
LwIP and discovered following error.
tcp_in.c:1133: internal compiler error: in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:771
Please submit a full bug report,
A full output of all passes showed, that combine seems to make invalid
Michael_fogel wrote:
(ior:SI (subreg:SI (mem/s:QI (reg/f:SI 1250) [0
variable.flags+0 S1 A32]) 0)
See register_operand and general_operand in recog.c. (SUBREG (MEM)) is
accepted by register_operand if INSN_SCHEDULING is not defined, for
historical reasons. This is something that
