a lot Michael. I'm having trouble compiling 2.23 on Gentoo but
I'm working on it.
- Grant
I can compile binutils-2.23.51.0.1 on the Beaglebone, but not
2.23.51.0.2 or 2.23.51.0.3. I can compile the 3.6 kernel with thumb2
support with 2.23.51.0.1.
Thanks,
Grant
Hello, I'm working with the BeagleBone and gcc-4.5.4 on Gentoo. If I
try to compile the 3.6 kernel with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL, I get:
arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S:127: Error: selected processor does
not support requested special purpose register -- `mrs r2,cpsr'
On 11 October 2012 17:58, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I'm working with the BeagleBone and gcc-4.5.4 on Gentoo. If I
try to compile the 3.6 kernel with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL, I get:
arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S:127: Error: selected processor does
not support requested special
Hello, I'm working with the BeagleBone and gcc-4.5.4 on Gentoo. If I
try to compile the 3.6 kernel with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL, I get:
arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S:127: Error: selected processor does
not support requested special purpose register -- `mrs r2,cpsr'
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I'm working with the BeagleBone and gcc-4.5.4 on Gentoo. If I
try to compile the 3.6 kernel with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL, I get:
arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S:127: Error: selected processor does
not support requested
Hello, I'm working with the BeagleBone and gcc-4.5.4 on Gentoo. If I
try to compile the 3.6 kernel with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL, I get:
arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S:127: Error: selected processor does
not support requested special purpose register -- `mrs r2,cpsr'
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I'm working with the BeagleBone and gcc-4.5.4 on Gentoo. If I
try to compile the 3.6 kernel with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL, I get:
arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S:127: Error: selected processor does
not support requested
On 15/06/11 17:38, Janis Johnson wrote:
On 06/15/2011 01:13 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On 14 June 2011 21:35, Janis Johnson jani...@codesourcery.com wrote:
These tests apparently require thumb2 support (I don't yet know much
about ARM). OK for trunk, and later 4.6?
OK - The -march
On 06/29/2011 06:55 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 15/06/11 17:38, Janis Johnson wrote:
On 06/15/2011 01:13 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On 14 June 2011 21:35, Janis Johnson jani...@codesourcery.com wrote:
These tests apparently require thumb2 support (I don't yet know much
about ARM). OK
Janis Johnson jani...@codesourcery.com writes:
On 06/29/2011 06:55 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
I'd posit a third option:
3. Add a new dg directive (perhaps dg-ignore-multilib) that instructs
the framework to ignore the multilib options entirely (only supported
for compile/assembly tests).
On 06/29/2011 06:55 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
3. Add a new dg directive (perhaps dg-ignore-multilib) that instructs
the framework to ignore the multilib options entirely (only supported
for compile/assembly tests).
There are a lot of target-specific tests that are not really testing
On 14 June 2011 21:35, Janis Johnson jani...@codesourcery.com wrote:
These tests apparently require thumb2 support (I don't yet know much
about ARM). OK for trunk, and later 4.6?
OK - The -march=armv7-a is redundant in these tests. You should be
able to lose them if arm_thumb2_ok returns true
These tests apparently require thumb2 support (I don't yet know much
about ARM). OK for trunk, and later 4.6?
Janis
2011-06-14 Janis Johnson jani...@codesourcery.com
* gcc.target/arm/pr42879.c: Skip if no thumb2 support, ignore
compiler warning about switch conflicts
13 matches
Mail list logo
