Re: understanding __FUNCTION__ generation

2007-09-12 Thread Sunzir Deepur
Hi Jim, On 9/12/07, Jim Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sunzir Deepur wrote: recently I've encountered a problem in which some removals of (what seems to be unneeded) lines of header files inflicted changes in the resulting binary. further inverstigation showed that the chages were

understanding __FUNCTION__ generation

2007-09-11 Thread Sunzir Deepur
hi list, recently I've encountered a problem in which some removals of (what seems to be unneeded) lines of header files inflicted changes in the resulting binary. further inverstigation showed that the chages were different __FUNCTION__.numbers (in the __FUNCTION__. xxx symbol names). can

Re: understanding __FUNCTION__ generation

2007-09-11 Thread Jim Wilson
Sunzir Deepur wrote: recently I've encountered a problem in which some removals of (what seems to be unneeded) lines of header files inflicted changes in the resulting binary. further inverstigation showed that the chages were different __FUNCTION__.numbers (in the __FUNCTION__. xxx symbol