On 14/10/11 16:21, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
One way we might address this is to redefine our 128-bit vector types as
structs of low/high Dwords. Each Dword remains a vector (apart from
64-bit lane types), but the Dword order then matches the ABI
On 10/14/2011 05:36 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
There is a testcase at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50696
It passes with my patch.
Cool, so let's wait for the results of testing.
Paolo
Richard Henderson schrieb:
On 10/13/2011 11:31 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Richard Henderson schrieb:
On 10/13/2011 12:00 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
What do you propose?
o A command line option that is on per default like
-mnoreturn-tail-calls or -mjmp-noreturn
The command-line-option.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org wrote:
On 10/14/2011 05:36 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
There is a testcase at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50696
It passes with my patch.
Cool, so let's wait for the results of testing.
Paolo
Here is the complete
On 10/13/2011 11:16 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2011-10-14 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
* config/i386/sse.md (vec_interleave_highmode,
vec_interleave_lowmode): Add AVX2 expanders for VI_256
modes.
* config/i386/i386.c (expand_vec_perm_interleave3): New function.
On 10/14/2011 06:23 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
+@item -mjump-to-noreturn
+@opindex mjump-to-noreturn
+Use a jump instruction instead of a call instruction when calling a
+no-return functions. This option is active if optimization is turned
+on and just affects the way a call instruction is
Denis Chertykov schrieb:
2011/10/10 Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de:
toplev.c complains about unwind tables currently require a frame pointer for
correctness.
This patchlet supplies a fix to avoid build warnings/test fails in that it
sets
flag_omit_frame_pointer to 0 if unwind needs FP.
I applied the following patch to the 4.6 branch to backport the fix for
libobjc/50002.
It makes sense to backport it to 4.6.x so that it appears in 4.6.2. It really
is quite a bug,
and the fix is simple/safe (and, the ObjFW guys were particularly keen on it).
Thanks
Index: class.c
I applied the following patch to backport the fix for libobjc/49883 to GCC 4.6
so that
it appears in 4.6.2. This is the clang-related problem that was recently
discussed.
Again, it's an important fix, but safe, with users (the ObjFW guys) asking for
it in 4.6.2,
which made total sense, so I
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Vladimir Yakovlev
vbyakov...@gmail.com wrote:
Patch is attached.
Thanks,
Vladimir
2011-10-14 Yakovlev Vladimir vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com
^ Should be in .
* gcc/config/i386/i386.c (atom_cost): Changed cost for
David pointed out that I had a typo in the AIX code in my builtin changes on
October 11th. I've checked this patch in as obvious.
2011-10-14 Michael Meissner meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_init_builtins): Fix typo in my
change on October 11th,
Can I apply this fix to the 4.6 branch as well ?
Some users are asking for it to be backported to the 4.6 branch.
It's not a regression, because the property implementation is new in GCC 4.6,
but it is still a serious
bug if you're trying to use properties with ObjC++, as you can't use
We should check for an initializer before complaining about lack
thereof. :)
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit fc150101bb79b3b328263e272a44eecd1083e6cd
Author: Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 13 21:57:21 2011 -0400
PR c++/50507
* method.c
Hi,
submitter complains that, at variance with C++11, __is_base_of doesn't
handle an incomplete base type (the first parameter). The reason seems
simple: in finish_trait_expr we try to complete *both* types instead of
doing it where/when necessary.
Tested x86_64-linux. Ok?
Thanks,
Paolo.
If you configure a biarch Linux/Sparc compiler defaulting to
32-bit, but give --with-cpu= for a v9 cpu it erroneously
turns on 64-bit in TARGET_DEFAULT.
PR target/50354 reports the breakage of the opposite case after the change:
configuring for sparc64-linux --with-cpu=v8 used to build a
On 10/14/2011 08:23 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
submitter complains that, at variance with C++11, __is_base_of doesn't
handle an incomplete base type (the first parameter). The reason seems
simple: in finish_trait_expr we try to complete *both* types instead
of doing it where/when
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:21:15AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
So what you're doing here is the low-part permutation:
0 4 1 5 2 6 3 7
followed by a shift to get
4 . 5 . 6 . 7 .
But you need to load a 256-bit constant from memory to get it.
Right.
I wonder if it
On 10/14/2011 08:30 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/14/2011 08:23 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
submitter complains that, at variance with C++11, __is_base_of
doesn't handle an incomplete base type (the first parameter). The
reason seems simple: in finish_trait_expr we try to complete *both*
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 19:19, Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de wrote:
Paolo Bonzini schrieb:
On 10/14/2011 06:23 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
+@item -mjump-to-noreturn
+@opindex mjump-to-noreturn
+Use a jump instruction instead of a call instruction when calling a
+no-return functions. This
On Friday 14 October 2011 18:19:00, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Paolo Bonzini schrieb:
On 10/14/2011 06:23 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
+@item -mjump-to-noreturn
+@opindex mjump-to-noreturn
+Use a jump instruction instead of a call instruction when calling a
+no-return functions. This
On 10/13/2011 05:22 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
+ DECL_INITIAL (r) = error_mark_node;
While working on 50507 I noticed that we check for error_mark_node in
walk_field_subobs, so I'm changing the placeholder to void_zero_node.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit
How about using complete_type_or_else?
Jason
On 10/14/2011 11:34 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2011-10-14 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
* config/i386/sse.md (vec_widen_smult_hi_v8hi,
vec_widen_smult_lo_v8hi, vec_widen_umult_hi_v8hi,
vec_widen_umult_lo_v8hi): Macroize using VI2_AVX2
mode iterator and any_extend
shift_right_vect,.-.L.shift_right_vect
.comm c,4096,32
.comm b,4096,32
.comm a,4096,32
.ident GCC: (GNU) 4.7.0 20111014 (experimental)
.file foo.c
.section.toc,aw
.section.text
.section.toc,aw
.LC1
From: Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:27:03 +0200
If you configure a biarch Linux/Sparc compiler defaulting to
32-bit, but give --with-cpu= for a v9 cpu it erroneously
turns on 64-bit in TARGET_DEFAULT.
PR target/50354 reports the breakage of the opposite case
Redo test to run at compile-time per Jason's suggestion
Index: libstdc++-v3/include/tr2/type_traits
===
--- libstdc++-v3/include/tr2/type_traits(revision 0)
+++ libstdc++-v3/include/tr2/type_traits(revision 0)
@@ -0,0
Looks good, thanks. I'll let Benjamin check this in.
Jason
:)
-Original Message-
From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 2:41 PM
To: Michael Spertus
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik; Jonathan Wakely; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
libstd...@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Intrinsics for N2965: Type traits and base classes
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 03:42:12PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
The generic support for vector permutation will allow for automatic
lowering to V*QImode, so all we need to add to support for these targets
is the single V16QI pattern that represents the base permutation insn.
I'm not
This patch breaks bootstrap on FreeBSD 8 and FreeBSD 9 and everyone
else using makeinfo 4.8 (when the minimum we require right now is
version 4.7).
Hence I went ahead and applied to simple patch below. If you'd
like to address this differently, happy to see a different approach.
Testing a
+@item -mjump-to-noreturn
+@opindex mjump-to-noreturn
+Use a jump instruction instead of a call instruction when calling a
+no-return functions. This option is active if optimization is turned
+on and just affects the way a call instruction is printed out.
Would emit be better here than
If one wants a 32-bit default compiler, they should build for the
sparc-linux target. And this is absolutely trivial to make happen
in the environments where this is supposedly a problem.
I have criticized so many times this combination in the past, while Jakub and
also you IIRC were
Attached, please find a patch fixing this issue.
2011-10-14 Balaji V. Iyer balaji.v.i...@intel.com
* varasm.c (default_elf_asm_named_section): Removed ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED
tag
before decl.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lance Taylor
Gerald Pfeifer schrieb:
This patch breaks bootstrap on FreeBSD 8 and FreeBSD 9 and everyone
else using makeinfo 4.8 (when the minimum we require right now is
version 4.7).
Hence I went ahead and applied to simple patch below. If you'd
like to address this differently, happy to see a different
From: Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:31:53 +0200
If one wants a 32-bit default compiler, they should build for the
sparc-linux target. And this is absolutely trivial to make happen
in the environments where this is supposedly a problem.
I have criticized so
On 10/13/2011 01:12 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
+ while (true)
+{
+ if (!linemap_macro_expansion_map_p (map0)
+ || !linemap_macro_expansion_map_p (map1)
+ || map0 == map1)
+ break;
I'd put the test in the condition, but if you find it clearer this way,
I guess
*ping*
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-10/msg00073.html
On 12.10.2011 15:57, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hello all,
this patch does two things:
a) It updates the Fortran 2003 and TR/TS 29113 status in the GNU
Fortran manual.
b) It changes all references to Technical Report 29113 to Technical
On 10/14/2011 12:53 PM, Michael Meissner wrote:
I would rather change altivec_vperm_mode to use the new name (and also
altivec_vperm_mode_uns). But I can live with a wrapper function for now.
As I said, I'm leaving the cleanup of the old patterns to port maintainers.
If we are adding permute
I found this thread through a Google search so I didn't have much context.
Can you point me to the google/main source repo for gcc and the kernel? Are
there plans to migrate this patch to the gcc and Linux mainline?
Sorry, but I have never used the PGO option in icc.
Steve
Xinliang David Li
On 10/14/2011 09:08 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
How about using complete_type_or_else?
The CPTK_IS_BASE_OF case becomes much simpler indeed, thanks. For the
unary traits, though, I don't see an advantage in using it, because in
some cases in check_trait_type we don't want to error out even when
On 10/14/2011 05:58 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/14/2011 09:08 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
How about using complete_type_or_else?
The CPTK_IS_BASE_OF case becomes much simpler indeed, thanks. For the
unary traits, though, I don't see an advantage in using it, because in
some cases in
Factor pph_out_binding_level and pph_in_binding_level into three
routines each: one to handle bindings that merge; one to handle those
that do not; and one to handle the parts common to both.
Streaming the global namespace now uses the mergeable version of
binding level streaming. At present we
+@item -mjump-to-noreturn
+@opindex mjump-to-noreturn
+Use a jump instruction instead of a call instruction when calling a
+no-return functions. This option is active if optimization is turned
+on and just affects the way a call instruction is printed out.
Would emit be better here than
On 10/15/2011 12:20 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
That should work.
Excellent. Then we can do something like the below, a great improvement.
I'm finishing testing it (already past g++.dg), Ok if it passes?
Thanks,
Paolo.
///
/cp
2011-10-14 Paolo Carlini
Agreed, please install this patch if you haven't already.
Thanks, done after successfully bootstrapping on SPARC64/Linux.
--
Eric Botcazou
Yes, I understand that.
But when the second 2.pph is skipped when reading foo.pph, the reading
of its line_table is also skipped (as foo.pph doesn't contain the
line_table information for 2.h, 2.pph does and adds it when its
included as a child, but if it's skipped, the line_table info for 2.h
Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de wrote:
the attached patch is the same as the last proposed patch in the PR but
with some fixed formatting and comments. Hope it's fine like that.
Tested against trunk rev 179778 with
make -k -j4 check RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=sh-sim
On Oct 14, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Nicola Pero wrote:
Can I apply this fix to the 4.6 branch as well ?
OK to commit to the 4.6 branch ?
Ok.
201 - 248 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
