On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:09 AM, FX wrote:
> Filed as PR63401: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63401
>
>
>> This is easy to see with a simple C test case:
>>
>> //__attribute__ ((optimize("strength-reduce")))
>> int foo (float x) { return __builtin_isnan(x); }
>>
>> Compiled with -O3
Hi all!
It was found that OA fails to build with GCC 4.9 on amd64 [1]
I can confirm this with r3094 on bare metal too.
# gcc --version
gcc-4.9.real (Debian 4.9.1-14) 4.9.1
Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> The failures for the gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_9.f90 are fixed
> with the following patch:
Looks good to me. The patch is OK with a ChangLog.
Thanks for the patch and sorry for the test fails.
Tobias
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:43:47AM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> It was found that OA fails to build with GCC 4.9 on amd64 [1]
> I can confirm this with r3094 on bare metal too.
>
> # gcc --version
> gcc-4.9.real (Debian 4.9.1-14) 4.9.1
> Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc
Hello!
> I have just submitted a patch emitting some new floating-point code from the
> Fortran front-end,
> improving our IEEE support there:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02444.html
>
> However, in one of the cases where we emit a call to __builtin_remainderf(),
> we get wro
> The __builtin_remainderf on x86 expands to x87 fprem1 instruction [1].
> According to the table in [1], +inf is not handled, and generates
> division-by-zero exception.
>
> IMO, we have to add "&& flag_finite_math_only" to expander enable
> condition of remainder{sf,df,xf}3 expanders in i386.md
Hi!
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:02:30 +, "Zamyatin, Igor"
wrote:
> Jeff Law wrote:
> > The original plan was for Balaji to take on this role; however, his
> > assignment
> > within Intel has changed and thus he's not going to have time to work on
> > Cilk+ anymore.
> >
> > Igor Zamyatin has bee
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:56:06PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:02:30 +, "Zamyatin, Igor"
> wrote:
> > Jeff Law wrote:
> > > The original plan was for Balaji to take on this role; however, his
> > > assignment
> > > within Intel has changed and thus he's no
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 03:20:44PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 09/24/14 14:32, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >2014-09-24 19:27 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> >>On 09/24/14 00:56, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>
> >>>
> >>>After register allocation we have no idea where GOT address is and
> >>>therefore delegitimize_addre
Hi!
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:00:19 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:56:06PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:02:30 +, "Zamyatin, Igor"
> > wrote:
> > > Jeff Law wrote:
> > > > The original plan was for Balaji to take on this role; however, his
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]>
>
> Sorry this has taken so long, the delays have been totally mine in not
> following-up to get votes, then tally them from the steering committee.
>
> I'm pleased to announce that Catherine Moore and Matthew Fortune have
>
On 27 September 2014 22:13, George R Goffe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having trouble getting email to Christoph who manages(?) the gcc-bugs
> mailing list. My emails are rejected. I'm not an email guy so the messages
> are rather indecipherable to me. Below is what I'm seeing.
>
> Regards,
>
> George..
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:09 AM, FX wrote:
> > Filed as PR63401: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63401
> >
> >
> >> This is easy to see with a simple C test case:
> >>
> >> //__attribute__ ((optimize("strength-reduce")))
> >> int foo (flo
The following is a response to what some may think an implausible
suggestion made here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2014-09/msg00124.html
The suggestion is that the system of education has been subverted so
that there are "unknown" physical laws which give "the unseen enemy"
Thanks for the analysis.
FYI: I don’t intend to follow up on that middle-end part, it’s much out of my
league, and I focus my limited hacking time to the Fortran front-end and
runtime library. I’ve filed the PR, so at least the problem is documented. I
will affect gfortran in the form of missed
Jonathan,
I'll give it a try. Thanks.
What is the problem with the mailing list software? Can't handle rich-text?
What a pain!
George...
From: Jonathan Wakely
To: George R Goffe
Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org"
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 6:14 AM
Subject: R
Hi,
I'm trying to get some help here.
I have two problems
with the mailing list software. #1) I have tried to get into digest mode
by unsubscribing and re-subscribing to the list but that's not working.
#2) I'm trying to get some help from the
"owner" of the list but emails to him are bouncing
On Sep 29, 2014, at 7:59 PM, George R Goffe wrote:
>
> Jonathan,
>
> I'll give it a try. Thanks.
>
>
> What is the problem with the mailing list software? Can't handle rich-text?
> What a pain!
I don’t know if that is true, but if so, a lot of people would argue that is a
feature. (I’m i
18 matches
Mail list logo
