On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 08:18:08PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> p.s. Any advice on how to get more targets working would be
> more than welcome :-)
With patch three from bug 32154
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13669>, the newlib
targets build out of the box in a combined
So, my open questions to the list are, what is/should be the preferred
way to bootstrap a cross compiler/glibc environment?
This likely isn't the preferred way, but the following builds
a cross toolchain for all but a few Linux targets:
$SRC/src/configure \
--target=$TARGET --prefix=$P
Dear Sir,
Re: Business Enquiry.
Please respond to my mail to you as per subject. My personal email is: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Umar Abubakar.
On Friday 17 August 2007 23:56:30 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> "Stephen M. Kenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > However, the question
> > remains, why is the problem still there to be circumvented? Is there
> > some secret opposition to easy use of these tools, is there some law
> > of nature t
Andrew Haley wrote:
David Daney writes:
> Stephen M. Kenton wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> .
> .
> .
> > I realize that there are various "solutions" for specific
> > platforms. Dan Kegel's excellent crosstool and the cross-lfs website,
> >
> .
> .
> .
> >
> > So, my open quest
David Daney writes:
> Stephen M. Kenton wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> .
> .
> .
> > I realize that there are various "solutions" for specific
> > platforms. Dan Kegel's excellent crosstool and the cross-lfs website,
> >
> .
> .
> .
> >
> > So, my open questions to the list are, wh
