Re: Modifying the datatype of a formal parameter

Hi, On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 01:57:17PM +1100, Matt Davis wrote: I am using 'ipa_modify_formal_parameters()' to change the type of a function's formal parameter. After my pass completes, I get a 'gimple_expand_cfg()' error. I must be missing some key piece here, as the failure points to a NULL

Re: Modifying the datatype of a formal parameter

Hi Martin and thank you very much for your reply. I do have some more resolution to my issue. On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote: Hi, On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 01:57:17PM +1100, Matt Davis wrote: I am using 'ipa_modify_formal_parameters()' to change the type

NYC: Moving and other jobs from 19$ per man on van/truck/hour,discounts for 7th and latest hours of jobtime or fix rate for whole jobs

NYC:Moving and other jobs 19$/hour/man on van/truck with no hidden fees Our team of healthy english and russian speaking guys looking for a group or personal job on own minivans or rented truck We doing deliveries and any type of movies From delivery of a coach to 3 bedroom house relocation

Possible wrong-way example in gcc4-4-2 documentation of __builtin_expect

Hello, The online docs at http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.4.2/gcc/Other-Builtins.html has a confusing (to me) example of __builtin_expect. Could someone take a look at this? start quote from above-referenced page Since you are limited to integral expressions for exp, you should use

[Bug tree-optimization/51606] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr51015.c (internal compiler error) on ppc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51606 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/51616] [4.7 Regression] gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 fails on hppa*-*-hpux*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51616 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/51606] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr51015.c (internal compiler error) on ppc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51606 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/51590] [4.7 Regression] ICE in gsi_for_stmt, at gimple-iterator.c:560

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51590 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dominiq at lps

[Bug testsuite/51603] ERROR: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv-cast[34].C: syntax error in target selector target c++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51603 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 09:23:20 UTC --- Works for me as well (checked on trunk and the 4.6 branch).

[Bug middle-end/51590] [4.7 Regression] ICE in gsi_for_stmt, at gimple-iterator.c:560

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51590 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/51601] ice in verify_live_on_entry

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51601 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/51600] ice in estimate_local_effects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug bootstrap/51599] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51599 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/51596] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 6 can not throw but has an EH edge with -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51596 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/51597] math libraryb not works

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51597 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c/51595] math libraryb not works

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51595 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/51581] Integer division by constant is not vectorized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51581 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/51620] [c++0x] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with private destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51620 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/51477] [c++0x] ICE with initialization of invalid non-static data member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51477 --- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 09:47:51 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Mon Dec 19 09:47:46 2011 New Revision: 182474 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182474 Log: PR c++/51477 - ICE with

[Bug c++/51477] [c++0x] ICE with initialization of invalid non-static data member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51477 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/48881] Dynamic link to libstdc++-6.dll / libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll produces broken binaries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881 Pierre Ossman ossman at cendio dot se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ossman at cendio

[Bug c++/51532] Invalid Code Generated for cpu32.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51532 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab schwab at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 10:14:17 UTC --- Author: schwab Date: Mon Dec 19 10:14:13 2011 New Revision: 182475 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182475 Log: PR target/51532 *

[Bug target/51532] Invalid Code Generated for cpu32.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51532 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/51619] [c++0x] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with array class member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51619 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug libstdc++/48881] Dynamic link to libstdc++-6.dll / libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll produces broken binaries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881 --- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 10:23:51 UTC --- Well, I wouldn't say that this was rude. The issue here is most likely, that the runtime DLLs by gcc aren't in search-path when you are trying to execute your

[Bug libstdc++/51609] [C++11] unique_ptrconst T[]::reset rejects cv-compatible argument pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51609 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 10:43:22 UTC --- Yes, this was an intentional choice (as I described in message c++std-lib-30840) to ensure the system doesn't get killed by a fork bomb, e.g. writing a

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/51596] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 6 can not throw but has an EH edge with -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51596 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug java/51465] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51465 --- Comment #2 from Kiskunsag gykarsai at all dot hu 2011-12-19 10:54:50 UTC --- Created attachment 26137 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26137 file for Error message by compilation Error message by compilation

[Bug java/51465] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51465 --- Comment #3 from Kiskunsag gykarsai at all dot hu 2011-12-19 10:57:02 UTC --- Created attachment 26138 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26138 Breaked assembler source Breaked by error assembler source of converted JAVA jar

[Bug java/51465] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51465 Kiskunsag gykarsai at all dot hu changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 --- Comment #4 from Dave Abrahams dave at boostpro dot com 2011-12-19 10:58:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Yes, this was an intentional choice (as I described in message c++std-lib-30840) to ensure the system doesn't get killed by a fork

[Bug tree-optimization/51601] [4.7 Regression] ice in verify_live_on_entry

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51601 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 11:13:25 UTC --- That would require a global integer somewhere to count the threads, which would probably have to be kept forever to maintain ABI compatibility. If I had time

[Bug middle-end/51590] [4.7 Regression] ICE in gsi_for_stmt, at gimple-iterator.c:560

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51590 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 11:16:11 UTC --- *** Bug 51601 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/51601] [4.7 Regression] ice in verify_live_on_entry

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51601 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/51328] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on invalid template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51328 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug fortran/51605] internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 11:39:55 UTC --- Created attachment 26139 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26139 Draft patch (for the rejects-valid part, not for the ICE) Draft patch,

[Bug libstdc++/51618] synchronous futures are slow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51618 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 11:51:52 UTC --- Could you expand on what you mean by no attached synchronization? If a global future visible to all threads stores a deferred function then it still needs

[Bug c/51622] New: GCC generates bad code that generate big executable sizes when using _Decimal*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51622 Bug #: 51622 Summary: GCC generates bad code that generate big executable sizes when using _Decimal* Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status:

[Bug libstdc++/51618] synchronous futures are slow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51618 --- Comment #2 from Dave Abrahams dave at boostpro dot com 2011-12-19 12:11:33 UTC --- on Mon Dec 19 2011, redi at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzilla-AT-gcc.gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51618 --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c/51622] GCC generates bad code that generate big executable sizes when using _Decimal*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51622 --- Comment #1 from Domingo Alvarez mingodad at gmail dot com 2011-12-19 12:17:28 UTC --- If code generation is solved probably we can have better results with the following: lua 5.1.4 with double - 150KB lua 5.1.4 with _Decimal64 - 2.4MB *with

[Bug libstdc++/48881] Dynamic link to libstdc++-6.dll / libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll produces broken binaries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881 Peter Åstrand astrand at cendio dot se changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/48881] Dynamic link to libstdc++-6.dll / libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll produces broken binaries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881 --- Comment #7 from Peter Åstrand astrand at cendio dot se 2011-12-19 12:24:44 UTC --- Created attachment 26141 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26141 gcc-4.4.3-threads.patch

[Bug c/51622] GCC generates bad code that generate big executable sizes when using _Decimal*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51622 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug libstdc++/48881] Dynamic link to libstdc++-6.dll / libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll produces broken binaries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881 --- Comment #8 from Peter Åstrand astrand at cendio dot se 2011-12-19 12:25:13 UTC --- Created attachment 26142 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26142 gcc-4.5.2-threads.patch

[Bug c/51622] GCC generates bad code that generate big executable sizes when using _Decimal*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51622 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal ---

[Bug target/51003] bfin ICE compiling libgcc in gen_const_vector, at emit-rtl.c:5476

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51003 Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/51616] [4.7 Regression] gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 fails on hppa*-*-hpux*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51616 --- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-12-19 13:05:34 UTC --- On 18-Dec-11, at 9:21 PM, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-11/msg00051.html hpux11 appears to be yet another OS that

[Bug bootstrap/51388] Configure failure to detect unsupported warning options for non-bootstrap builds (including cross builds)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51388 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab schwab at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 13:12:31 UTC --- Author: schwab Date: Mon Dec 19 13:12:26 2011 New Revision: 182478 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182478 Log: Check for warning flags

[Bug libstdc++/51618] synchronous futures are slow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51618 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 13:13:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) I'm confused. IIUC even shared_futures aren't supposed to be accessed concurrently from multiple threads. Why would multiple

[Bug fortran/51605] internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 13:17:15 UTC --- Dan: Your program should work (with 4.6.2 - or with 4.7 + my patch) if you either change either the SELECT TYPE label or the subroutine name from

[Bug rtl-optimization/51271] [4.7 Regression] ICE in in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2244

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51271 --- Comment #15 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 13:17:23 UTC --- given this definition, maybe insn 141 should be marked as frame-related, since it restores a reg in the epilogue. It seems to be the other way round: insn 141 is ignored

[Bug libstdc++/51618] synchronous futures are slow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51618 --- Comment #4 from Dave Abrahams dave at boostpro dot com 2011-12-19 13:24:16 UTC --- Not a problem; thanks for looking.

[Bug debug/51471] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20040811-1.c and gcc.c-torture/execute/vla-dealloc-1.c fails at -O3 -g on mips64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51471 --- Comment #13 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 13:23:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) This is the patch which I am testing: Index: genattrtab.c === --- genattrtab.c

[Bug bootstrap/51572] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51572 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/51572] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51572 --- Comment #19 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 13:39:04 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Dec 19 13:37:06 2011 New Revision: 182479 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182479 Log: 2011-12-19 Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/51600] [4.7 Regression] ice in estimate_local_effects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at

[Bug tree-optimization/51606] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr51015.c (internal compiler error) on ppc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51606 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 14:22:36 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 19 14:22:29 2011 New Revision: 182480 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182480 Log: PR middle-end/51590

[Bug middle-end/51590] [4.7 Regression] ICE in gsi_for_stmt, at gimple-iterator.c:560

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51590 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 14:22:36 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 19 14:22:29 2011 New Revision: 182480 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182480 Log: PR middle-end/51590

[Bug tree-optimization/51596] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 6 can not throw but has an EH edge with -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51596 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 14:24:34 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 19 14:24:29 2011 New Revision: 182481 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182481 Log: PR

[Bug tree-optimization/51596] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 6 can not throw but has an EH edge with -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51596 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/51590] [4.7 Regression] ICE in gsi_for_stmt, at gimple-iterator.c:560

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51590 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/51328] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on invalid template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51328 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-12-19 14:29:44 UTC --- Well, rejects it a instantiation time. Thus I guess rejecting it earlier is fine, but we don't want to misled people by saying that 'typename T::~T'

[Bug c/51622] GCC generates bad code that generate big executable sizes when using _Decimal*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51622 --- Comment #4 from Domingo Alvarez mingodad at gmail dot com 2011-12-19 14:30:26 UTC --- Created attachment 26143 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26143 Another program to demonstrate gcc bad code generation On the previous

[Bug tree-optimization/51583] One more missing force_gimple_operand in SRA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51583 --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 14:33:21 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Dec 19 14:33:18 2011 New Revision: 182483 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182483 Log: 2011-12-19 Martin

[Bug c/51622] GCC generates bad code that generate big executable sizes when using _Decimal*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51622 --- Comment #5 from Domingo Alvarez mingodad at gmail dot com 2011-12-19 14:34:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Which architecture are you compiling for? gcc mingw32 4.6.1 32bits

[Bug c/51622] GCC generates bad code that generate big executable sizes when using _Decimal*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51622 --- Comment #6 from Domingo Alvarez mingodad at gmail dot com 2011-12-19 14:40:45 UTC --- Rewrite expected executable sizes with a realistic better code generation by gcc. If code generation is solved probably we can have better results with the

[Bug c++/50012] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] C++ front end misses -Wsign-compare warnings when extraneous parentheses are present

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50012 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 14:43:05 UTC --- This has been introduced with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-06/msg01402.html which has been written as a better way of:

[Bug c/51622] GCC generates bad code that generate big executable sizes when using _Decimal*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51622 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/51605] internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 15:30:29 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Dec 19 15:30:23 2011 New Revision: 182484 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182484 Log: 2011-12-19 Tobias Burnus

[Bug rtl-optimization/51366] [cygwin] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2244

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51366 --- Comment #5 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org 2011-12-19 15:31:46 UTC --- Reduced test case is: % cat exclude.c int version; int zz1(char *); static void zz2(int flags) { static int initialized = 0; char xx[4096]; if

[Bug c++/51619] [c++0x] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with array class member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51619 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 15:38:09 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 19 15:38:06 2011 New Revision: 182485 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182485 Log: PR c++/51619 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/51623] New: PowerPC section type conflict

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51623 Bug #: 51623 Summary: PowerPC section type conflict Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/51623] PowerPC section type conflict

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51623 --- Comment #1 from Chung-Lin Tang cltang at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 15:44:10 UTC --- Created attachment 26145 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26145 Minimal testcase

[Bug c++/51619] [c++0x] [4.6 Regression] ICE with array class member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51619 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[c++0x] [4.6/4.7|[c++0x] [4.6

[Bug fortran/51605] internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605 --- Comment #11 from Dan Nagle danlnagle at me dot com 2011-12-19 15:51:40 UTC --- Hi, I can confirm that changing the label of the select type to integer_or_logical_or_error removes the ICE. I did so at lines 9325 and 13536 in the original

[Bug tree-optimization/51580] [4.7 regression] segfault during loop vectorization at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51580 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug lto/51573] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in lto_varpool_encoder_encode_initializer_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51573 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug lto/51573] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in lto_varpool_encoder_encode_initializer_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51573 --- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 15:57:06 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Dec 19 15:57:02 2011 New Revision: 182487 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182487 Log: 2011-12-19 Richard

[Bug c++/51328] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on invalid template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51328 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 15:58:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Thus I guess rejecting it earlier is fine, but we don't want to misled people by saying that 'typename T::~T' would be ok. Agreed.

[Bug tree-optimization/51600] [4.7 Regression] ice in estimate_local_effects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc

[Bug c++/51553] brace initialization and conversion operators

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51553 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug bootstrap/50686] [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686 --- Comment #26 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-12-19 16:40:33 UTC --- --- Comment #25 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-16 20:05:16 UTC --- Can you try the patch in PR

[Bug tree-optimization/51583] One more missing force_gimple_operand in SRA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51583 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 16:47:35 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Dec 19 16:47:28 2011 New Revision: 182488 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182488 Log: 2011-12-19 Martin

[Bug ada/51624] New: [4.6/4.7 regression] Assert_Failure atree.adb:808 on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51624 Bug #: 51624 Summary: [4.6/4.7 regression] Assert_Failure atree.adb:808 on IRIX 6.5 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51625] New: -Wconversion should be on by default, or at least included in -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51625 Bug #: 51625 Summary: -Wconversion should be on by default, or at least included in -Wall Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.2 Status:

[Bug c++/51328] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on invalid template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51328 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/48743] -march=native mis-detects AMD K6-2+ / K6-3 as Athlon - compiled C fails with illegal instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743 --- Comment #6 from Quentin Neill qneill at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 17:57:42 UTC --- Author: qneill Date: Mon Dec 19 17:57:32 2011 New Revision: 182489 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182489 Log: 2011-12-19 Quentin Neill

[Bug libstdc++/51626] New: [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] can't use C++98 allocators with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51626 Bug #: 51626 Summary: [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] can't use C++98 allocators with -std=c++0x Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status:

[Bug testsuite/50722] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr49994-3.c (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722 --- Comment #4 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-12-19 18:33:07 UTC --- Yes, this was failing on ia64 hpux as well as hppa hpux.

[Bug rtl-optimization/50063] [4.6/4.7 Regression] DSE: wrong code for gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/51626] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] can't use C++98 allocators with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51626 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-12-19 18:38:56 UTC --- Bah, in my opinion it's late to attempt sophisticated things in 4.6, either we can do something minimal or we should just tell people that in 4.6 a

[Bug fortran/51605] internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605 --- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 18:41:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) subroutine foo BLOCK_NAME: block end block BLOCK_NAME end subroutine foo subroutine BLOCK_NAME() end

[Bug target/48743] -march=native mis-detects AMD K6-2+ / K6-3 as Athlon - compiled C fails with illegal instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743 Quentin Neill qneill at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qneill at gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/50063] [4.6/4.7 Regression] DSE: wrong code for gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063 --- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 18:56:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) I believe this is just because of very weird target avr stuff, either it is a target bug that can be fixed up in the backend

[Bug libstdc++/51626] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] can't use C++98 allocators with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51626 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 18:57:45 UTC --- I agree with the sentiment, but unfortunately a C++11 allocator isn't required to provide a construct member at all. 17.6.3.5 p5 shows a minimal C++11

[Bug libstdc++/51626] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] can't use C++98 allocators with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51626 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 19:04:53 UTC --- Unfortunately either of those would cause a regression for PR 32618

[Bug rtl-optimization/50063] [4.6/4.7 Regression] DSE: wrong code for gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4 --- Comment

  1   2   3   >