* Stack save/restore not working? - XFAIL testcases
Related to this:
ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid rhs for gimple memory store with
-fgnu-tm --param tm-max-aggregate-size=32
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51472
Proposed fix, waiting for review.
[trans-mem] save/restore of
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:53:10PM +1100, Matt Davis wrote:
Here is a follow up. I am closer to what I need, but not quite there
yet. Basically I just want to switch the type of one formal parameter
to a different type.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Matt Davis mattdav...@gmail.com
Terry Guo flame...@gmail.com writes:
I plan to set up daily regression test on trunk for target
ARM-NONE-EABI and post results to gcc-testresults mailing list. Which
Binutils should I use, the Binutils trunk or the latest released
Binutils? And which way is recommended, building from a
Wonderful! Thanks Aldy.
On 12/21/2011 09:11 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
* ICE when lto1 does not have -fgnu-tm and object file uses TM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51280
I believe I wasn't able to reproduce this.
Arg really! For the openmp testcase, I was wrong but the tm
On 21 December 2011 02:00, Jim Avera wrote:
Ok, here is a patch which improves the example:
--- gcc/doc/extend.texi.ORIG 2011-12-20 17:35:32.236578828 -0800
+++ gcc/doc/extend.texi 2011-12-20 17:37:10.460583316 -0800
@@ -7932,7 +7932,7 @@
@smallexample
if (__builtin_expect (ptr !=
On 21 December 2011 18:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21 December 2011 02:00, Jim Avera wrote:
Ok, here is a patch which improves the example:
--- gcc/doc/extend.texi.ORIG 2011-12-20 17:35:32.236578828 -0800
+++ gcc/doc/extend.texi 2011-12-20 17:37:10.460583316 -0800
@@ -7932,7 +7932,7
Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com writes:
In order to follow the GCC coding style (a space between the function
name and opening parenthesis) and to match the first example for
__builtin_expect, I propose this patch instead:
Index: extend.texi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51646
Bug #: 51646
Summary: Make libgfortran compile on Android - without S_IREAD
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51644
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42839
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.4 |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41159
--- Comment #23 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
09:23:03 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 21 09:22:58 2011
New Revision: 182570
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182570
Log:
2011-12-21 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41159
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
09:29:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
This one is extremely slow. lto1 has already used
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-12-21 09:37:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
That's weird. Did
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51644
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51644
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
09:51:45 UTC ---
Caused by r181172 aka TREE_CLOBBER_P. The problem is that we have before
*.cfg:
__builtin_va_start (args, 0);
b (s, args);
__builtin_va_end (args);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51644
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51643
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-eabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51642
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51646
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51646
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21 10:21:32
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Good catch! I suppose it's possible that all targets we support have the POSIX
flags, but since we're in stage 3 I think it's fine to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51647
Bug #: 51647
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bogus control reaches end of
non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648
Bug #: 51648
Summary: [4.7 Regression]
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51622
--- Comment #10 from Domingo Alvarez mingodad at gmail dot com 2011-12-21
10:36:45 UTC ---
Now looking on the net I found that libbid history and could see that the
actual one monolithic bid_decimalbinary file is a recent creation before it was
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51647
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
10:56:01 UTC ---
One issue we still hit is that we for example merge in
stl_iterator_base_types.h
templatetypename _Iterator
struct iterator_traits
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
11:03:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 26158
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26158
patch candidate to speed up uniquify nodes
I was also experimenting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50478
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-12-21
11:17:10 UTC ---
Insane, this doesn't happen for an initializer list of 1, 2, 4, or 5 elements.
Happens with std::vector too, however. Should be rather easy to construct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51644
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
11:38:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 26159
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26159
gcc47-pr51644.patch
Fix I'm going to bootstrap/regtest.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
11:41:04 UTC ---
Why -fexceptions? Don't we explicitely _disable_ exceptions?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51647
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
11:42:16 UTC ---
Dup of PR51644 I think.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51649
Bug #: 51649
Summary: pretty printers don't handle std::__7:: namespace
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
11:52:55 UTC ---
-O2 -g -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mtune=generic
are our standard distro flags. The intent is that e.g. C code that uses
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50038
--- Comment #8 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
11:52:32 UTC ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Wed Dec 21 11:52:27 2011
New Revision: 182574
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182574
Log:
gcc/
2011-12-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51649
--- Comment #1 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-12-21 11:53:23
UTC ---
adding '(__7::)?' to regex patterns should be ok.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50478
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41159
--- Comment #25 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21 12:26:17 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Dec 21 12:26:04 2011
New Revision: 182580
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182580
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-12-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50478
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-12-21
12:43:38 UTC ---
This is a more correct testcase, which also preserves the property of OT that
-pedantic works around the issue. Note: removing the string constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
--- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-12-21 12:55:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
One issue we still hit is that we for example merge in
stl_iterator_base_types.h
templatetypename _Iterator
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26158|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
--- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
13:00:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 26162
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26162
patch for this bug
And finally the patch for this particular bug, to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
--- Comment #17 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-12-21 13:47:16 UTC ---
It's a little bit faster now. But it still takes 9 CPU-minutes
to output all ltrans files. And then the following happens:
At top level:
lto1:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51291
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
14:00:36 UTC ---
fixed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51273
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51291
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-12-21 14:05:42 UTC ---
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, markus at trippelsdorf dot de wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
--- Comment #17 from Markus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51174
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51472
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
14:30:20 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Dec 21 14:30:07 2011
New Revision: 182588
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182588
Log:
PR middle-end/51472
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51472
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51647
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
14:51:34 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 21 14:51:19 2011
New Revision: 182589
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182589
Log:
PR middle-end/51644
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51644
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
14:51:38 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 21 14:51:19 2011
New Revision: 182589
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182589
Log:
PR middle-end/51644
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
--- Comment #19 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
15:00:21 UTC ---
Btw, one issue with merging based on DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION is that reducing
LTO testcases is going to be disrupted by source line changes. So for it
to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
--- Comment #20 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
15:06:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
Btw, one issue with merging based on DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION is that reducing
LTO testcases is going to be disrupted by source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51645
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-12-21 15:10:48
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-debug-0.C (test for excess errors)
Needs:
/* { dg-skip-if No stabs { mmix-*-* *-*-aix* alpha*-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
15:18:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 26163
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26163
gcc.i
/some/path/gcc/cc1 -fpreprocessed -quiet -quiet -dumpbase gcc.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
15:20:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 26164
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26164
gcc.gcda
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
15:23:57 UTC ---
BTW, it can be also reproduced without that -j8 make option, i.e. it is not any
kind of race condition or similar.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51644
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51644
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
15:32:11 UTC ---
*** Bug 51647 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51647
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
--- Comment #21 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-12-21 15:47:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
(In reply to comment #19)
Btw, one issue with merging based on DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION is that reducing
LTO testcases
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-12-21 15:51:16 UTC ---
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, markus at trippelsdorf dot de wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
--- Comment #21 from Markus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
--- Comment #23 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
16:01:30 UTC ---
Another fun (well ...) patch that is worth trying is
Index: gcc/gimple.c
===
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51630
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51630
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
16:14:39 UTC ---
Feel free to open an enhancement request in bugzilla for -fsyntax-only to
instantiate templates, or for a new option that does so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51649
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
16:20:15 UTC ---
It might be better to provide a separate python/libstdcxx/v7/printers.py file
and install that when configured with versioned namespaces.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #27 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-12-21 16:20:12 UTC ---
With the exception of the unrelated Ada bootstrap failure (PR
ada/51624), your patch allowed a mips-sgi-irix6.5 bootstrap to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51212
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51305
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51305
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-21 16:28:19 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Dec 21 16:28:08 2011
New Revision: 182594
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182594
Log:
/cp
2011-12-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48660
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48660
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-21 16:34:49 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Dec 21 16:34:41 2011
New Revision: 182595
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182595
Log:
Add
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052
Fabio fabio.ped at libero dot it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fabio.ped at libero dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51212
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
17:18:11 UTC ---
As far as the compiler goes that all sounds plausible.
The main problem is that we would have to make libitm exception safe.
I'm 100% sure that won't work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41159
--- Comment #26 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21 17:23:44 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Dec 21 17:23:33 2011
New Revision: 182597
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182597
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-12-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51649
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51552
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51552
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
18:15:23 UTC ---
Ok, so when the -fprofile-generate compiled xgcc is linked, it is enough
to (assuming gcc.i from the attachment here is in /tmp/):
$ rm gcc.gcda; ./xgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41159
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51216
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51649
--- Comment #4 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21 18:34:47
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Tom, I assume the plan for the libstdc++ python printers is to have a
python/libstdcxx/v7/printers.py for the libstdc++.so.7 library,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51626
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
18:35:48 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Dec 21 18:35:40 2011
New Revision: 182600
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182600
Log:
PR libstdc++/51626
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51626
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
19:01:22 UTC ---
So, shorter/faster reproducer, using a snapshot from ~ today (tried with
r182599)
on x86_64-linux:
../configure --enable-languages=c --disable-bootstrap \
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51611
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
19:19:52 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 21 19:19:47 2011
New Revision: 182602
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182602
Log:
PR c++/51611
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51611
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51552
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
20:21:14 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Wed Dec 21 20:21:00 2011
New Revision: 182604
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182604
Log:
PR target/51552
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
Bug #: 51650
Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at
dwarf2out.c:22501 while building libxul
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51552
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
version 4.7.0 20111221 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40711
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40676
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39852
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40782
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
