On 01/24/2013 06:43 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Chassin chas...@ceis.cujae.edu.cu wrote:
On 01/23/2013 02:37 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
Please keep this on the list.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Chassin chas...@ceis.cujae.edu.cu
wrote:
On 01/23/2013 10:55
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I read code in lower-subreg.c and found GCC only split some of
multi-word mode instructions, like load from memory into pseudo reg,
etc. The related code is in find_decomposable_subregs.
So for below example from
Hi!
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:34:09 -0800, Roland McGrath rol...@hack.frob.com wrote:
For libc, I think always using $CC -E is fine. You don't need to bother
with the MSG_CHECKING and CACHE_VAL boilerplate.
Ah, I thought the caching was required to have config.status' --recheck
do the right
Hi!
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:37:16 +0100, I wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:09:33 +0100, I wrote:
Also known as: »I found another one«.
(That's the last one I'm currently seeing.) Again depending on
gnu/stubs.h usability, we either get:
checking for [GCC] option to accept ISO C89...
Il 25/01/2013 08:24, Uday P. Khedker ha scritto:
Exactly. We have been using our training program since 2007 (and have
been incrementally refining it on a continuously). Our experience has
been that it has brought down the ramp up period of novices to a couple
of week.
A couple of weeks is
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, David Daney wrote:
I'm not understanding why mips16 and nomips16 are not simple inheritable
attributes.
The mips16ness of a function must be known by the caller so that the
appropriate version of the JAL/JALX instruction can be emitted
Not really, the issue of JAL
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Richard Sandiford wrote:
I would assume that foo would be nomips16 and goo would be mips16.
The definition of plain foo() or goo() says that nothing is specified.
What is not clear then?
This is how all such other attributes in gcc are handled.
Well, in a
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Sudakshina Das
sudakshina1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Sudakshina Das
sudakshina1...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I am currently updating a
Maciej W. Rozycki ma...@codesourcery.com writes:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Richard Sandiford wrote:
I would assume that foo would be nomips16 and goo would be mips16.
The definition of plain foo() or goo() says that nothing is specified.
What is not clear then?
This is how all such
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Uday P. Khedker u...@cse.iitb.ac.in wrote:
Richard Biener wrote, On Thursday 24 January 2013 05:28 PM:
In the program below, we have a global pointer p that has conditional
assignments before its
use on the RHS of a copy statement.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Chassin chas...@ceis.cujae.edu.cu wrote:
On 01/24/2013 06:43 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Chassin chas...@ceis.cujae.edu.cu
wrote:
On 01/23/2013 02:37 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
Please keep this on the list.
On Wed, Jan 23,
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Sudakshina Das
sudakshina1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Sudakshina Das
sudakshina1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Sudakshina Das
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Sudakshina Das
sudakshina1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Sudakshina Das
sudakshina1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Richard Biener
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
I read code in lower-subreg.c and found GCC only split some of
multi-word mode instructions, like load from memory into pseudo reg,
etc. The related code is in find_decomposable_subregs.
So for below example from
Hello,
Is there any technical reason (besides nobody bothers to implement it) why GCC
doesn't support multistep conversions for widen mult?
In tree-vect-stmts.c:
/* Check if it's a multi-step conversion that can be done using intermediate
types. */
prev_type = vectype;
prev_mode =
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Sudakshina Das
sudakshina1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Sudakshina Das
sudakshina1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Sudakshina Das
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Paulo Matos pma...@broadcom.com wrote:
Hello,
Is there any technical reason (besides nobody bothers to implement it) why
GCC doesn't support multistep conversions for widen mult?
No.
In tree-vect-stmts.c:
/* Check if it's a multi-step conversion that can
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 January 2013 15:59
To: Paulo Matos
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: autovectorizer doesn't support multistep widen mult
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Paulo Matos pma...@broadcom.com wrote:
Paolo Bonzini wrote, On Friday 25 January 2013 05:38 PM:
Il 25/01/2013 08:24, Uday P. Khedker ha scritto:
Exactly. We have been using our training program since 2007 (and have
been incrementally refining it on a continuously). Our experience has
been that it has brought down the ramp up
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/24/2013 12:55 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
I do see, however, a few areas where Clang/LLVM have gone that I do
not think GCC is currently thinking of entering: toolability (for
the lack of a better term). Clang's design
On 01/25/2013 09:21 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Chassin chas...@ceis.cujae.edu.cu wrote:
On 01/24/2013 06:43 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Chassin chas...@ceis.cujae.edu.cu
wrote:
On 01/23/2013 02:37 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
Please
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Sudakshina Das
sudakshina1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Sudakshina Das
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20130125 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20130125/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56098
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56035
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
08:52:33 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jan 25 08:52:02 2013
New Revision: 195462
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195462
Log:
Fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56035
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54793
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
09:08:14 UTC ---
Well, we can also just use the first NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK resp.
NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG, whichever comes first.
The bigger problem with that ia64, pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
09:28:14 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Jan 25 09:28:09 2013
New Revision: 195464
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195464
Log:
gcc/
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54793
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
09:35:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 29271
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29271
gcc48-pr54793.patch
So, e.g. this seems to work for me from quick
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55308
--- Comment #5 from Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk 2013-01-25
09:37:38 UTC ---
I'm building gcc-4.8-20130113.
I tried your patch, although my line numbers
are different:
# diff -u10 configure.ac.orig configure.ac
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56103
Bug #: 56103
Summary: Overwrite classes on destruction for debug
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104
Bug #: 56104
Summary: Wrong dereferencing type-punned pointer warning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56094
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
11:29:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 29272
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29272
gcc48-pr56094.patch
input_location is used heavily in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56103
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56094
--- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
11:43:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Created attachment 29272 [details]
gcc48-pr56094.patch
input_location is used heavily in the gimplifier, gimplify_expr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56105
Bug #: 56105
Summary: Simple ANSI C 89 code - Mudflap false violation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56094
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
12:04:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
You are explaining how it works right now. What I am asking is how we want it
to work, that is, why the gimplifier needs to care
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56106
Bug #: 56106
Summary: complex pow improvements
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56101
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693
--- Comment #42 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-01-25
13:23:12 UTC ---
Full regression testing on x86_64-apple-darwin12 of proposed patch to supply
dummy functions as a static archive shows no regressions in any tm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56107
Bug #: 56107
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL:
gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90 -O2 execution test
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56108
Bug #: 56108
Summary: Asm statement in transaction_relaxed crashes compiler.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: trans-mem
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56107
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25 14:27:10 UTC ---
This is probably a duplicate of PR 55978 (which, however, was claimed to be due
to r195125, which does not match the interval in comment 0).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56107
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25 14:36:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Maybe we could remove gfc_copy_formal_args{,_ppc} completely. After all, we
keep a pointer to the interface, so the dummy arguments remain
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56098
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25 14:43:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 29274
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29274
patch v2
Here is an updated version of Mikael's patch, which is free of testsuite
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56097
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56109
Bug #: 56109
Summary: Add light-weight ABI-compatible debug checks to
standard containers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
15:05:48 UTC ---
Given the
/* If the object is not dynamic the access invokes undefined
behavior. As it is not executed in this case silence the
spurious
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56034
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
15:33:57 UTC ---
So, we replace
# a.0_26 = PHI a.0_10(5)
with
# a.0_26 = PHI .MEM_10(5)
This happens when we call rewrite_into_loop_closed_ssa in case we're
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56098
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55907
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56110
Bug #: 56110
Summary: Sub-optimal code: unnecessary CMP after AND
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55907
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-01-25
17:12:52 UTC ---
Revision 183136 (2012-01-12) is OK; revision 183306 (2012-01-19) gives the ICE.
This is due to a change made on 4.7 and backported to 4.6.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55907
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56107
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
Bug #: 56111
Summary: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
17:55:22 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 25 17:55:09 2013
New Revision: 195470
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195470
Log:
PR c++/56104
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56034
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
18:16:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
So, we replace
# a.0_26 = PHI a.0_10(5)
with
# a.0_26 = PHI .MEM_10(5)
This happens when we call
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787
--- Comment #16 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
18:32:39 UTC ---
I do have a caller of the clone (in the WPA dump):
init_.constprop.2/71 (init_.constprop.2) @0x7f10180f06f0
Type: function
...
Clone of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56112
Bug #: 56112
Summary: [4.8 Regression] cannot create unordered_map from
range of types convertible to value_type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54410
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56095
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
20:01:35 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 25 20:01:29 2013
New Revision: 195474
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195474
Log:
PR c++/56095
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56098
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
20:04:01 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 25 20:03:54 2013
New Revision: 195475
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195475
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56095
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56098
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56095
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
20:26:56 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 25 20:26:46 2013
New Revision: 195476
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195476
Log:
PR c++/56104
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53518
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113
Bug #: 56113
Summary: out of memory when compiling a function with many goto
labels (50k )
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113
--- Comment #1 from Kangkook aixer77 at gmail dot com 2013-01-25 20:39:06 UTC
---
Created attachment 29276
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29276
a script to generates the code that reproduces the bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #13 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
20:58:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Here is an updated version of Mikael's patch, which is free of testsuite
regressions.
Indeed, it was not that difficult
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55905
--- Comment #2 from Damian Rouson damian at rouson dot net 2013-01-25
21:32:40 UTC ---
Hi Janus,
I've added Karla Morris to the cc list for this bug. She discovered it
independently so I guess this one is now stumbling block for two
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37522
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56076
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
22:36:16 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 25 22:36:11 2013
New Revision: 195478
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195478
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56098
--- Comment #6 from werner at almesberger dot net 2013-01-25 22:46:17 UTC ---
Thanks for the analysis and the fixes ! I'll try them soonish.
Regarding work-arounds, the ones I mentioned for my original code snippet
(i.e., -O1 or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56114
Bug #: 56114
Summary: x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc generate wrong asm instruction
MOVABS for intel syntax
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
22:56:43 UTC ---
This also fails in the same place (without renaming):
program gar_nichts
use ISO_C_BINDING, only :: C_PTR, C_NULL_PTR
type(c_ptr) nada
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56114
Alexander Kobets akobets at mail dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akobets
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
23:10:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Sorry, an error in the test case. This has the same error:
program gar_nichts
use ISO_C_BINDING
type(c_ptr) nada
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56076
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56076
--- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25
23:43:27 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 25 23:43:23 2013
New Revision: 195479
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195479
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56076
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56108
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37522
--- Comment #15 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25 23:53:37
UTC ---
Issue was fixed on trunk. As far as I know should rawhide Fedora have fixed
that issue already. Nevertheless we could define the broken-vsprintf macro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56098
--- Comment #7 from werner at almesberger dot net 2013-01-26 02:09:33 UTC ---
I'm happy to confirm that trunk (for x86-64) now passes all variations of this
theme I tried with flying colors. Thanks again !
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56115
Bug #: 56115
Summary: Internal compiler error / unable to generate a
relocatable output with object file(which is with lto
info).
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56115
--- Comment #1 from William tanjinfa at huawei dot com 2013-01-26 02:41:14
UTC ---
oops!I make a mistake,actually I test the crash.c like this:
armeb-linux-gnueabi-gcc crash.c -c -flto -O2 -o crash.out
armeb-linux-gnueabi-gcc -r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56115
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
