Hi,
gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c and a couple of other tests segfault
for the AVR target. Looking at the code, I found that the
x_ira_register_move_cost array[TImode] is NULL, while the code goes on
to dereference it (ira_register_move_cost
[ALLOCNO_MODE (a)][best][aclass] at line
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Luca Risolia
luca.riso...@linux-projects.org wrote:
I would like to propose the adoption of C++11 to my colleagues for our
production code.
We use to rebuild everything with the same compiler version each time (GCC
4.7.3 for now), so ABI incompatibilities
Snapshot gcc-4.8-20131226 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20131226/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Comment on attachment 31516
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31516
New patch based on Andrew's review
No this wrong in two ways. Move the check to before the check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59601
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0)
1. No change. __attribute__ ((target(arch=corei7))) won't
match Westmere and function won't be optimized for Westmere.
2. Make
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600
--- Comment #7 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
Move the check to before the check of the target
attribute table.
My bad.
And second you should compare the current function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59601
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1)
mv1.C failure migh be a testcase problem. However, the testcase works for me
on ivybridge, which is also corei7 arch with popcnt.
It also
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59601
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59601
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59576
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41090
--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The test g++.dg/ext/label13.C XPASS after r20182 on darwin.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59601
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Before my cleanup, get_builtin_code_for_version had
switch (new_target-arch)
{
case PROCESSOR_CORE2:
arg_str = core2;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59379
--- Comment #10 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com ---
I could build profiled bootstrap for r204980 successfully
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59379
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Igor Zamyatin from comment #10)
I could build profiled bootstrap for r204980 successfully
Is that possible to find a testcase?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56674
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
This appeared at r181425.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59023
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59602
Bug ID: 59602
Summary: ARM, __attribute__((interrupt(FIQ))) causes internal
compiler error with -O0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56169
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46485
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53035
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50552
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59379
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Igor Zamyatin from comment #10)
I could build profiled bootstrap for r204980 successfully
It isn't about profiled bootstrap. It is about make check in
libgomp. All
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59601
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Dec 26 14:47:15 2013
New Revision: 206212
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206212root=gccview=rev
Log:
Map arch=corei7/arch=nehalem to M_INTEL_COREI7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59023
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58721
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31517
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31517action=edit
Patch to extend __builtin_expect
Hi,
this patch adds internal use only parameter to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59588
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Dec 26 16:10:55 2013
New Revision: 206213
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206213root=gccview=rev
Log:
Don't check/change generic/i686 tuning
gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59603
Bug ID: 59603
Summary: std::random_shuffle tries to swap element with itself
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59603
--- Comment #1 from Fabian Emmes fab at orlen dot de ---
Created attachment 31518
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31518action=edit
program triggering the error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58003
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59604
Bug ID: 59604
Summary: Constant comparisons with -fno-range-check and
int(z'...')
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59601
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41090
--- Comment #22 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 26-Dec-13, at 7:28 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41090
--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot
ens.fr ---
The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59588
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598
Denis Kolesnik denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598
--- Comment #7 from Denis Kolesnik denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net ---
I found my error, sorry for it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598
Denis Kolesnik denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598
Denis Kolesnik denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598
--- Comment #10 from Denis Kolesnik denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net ---
:
the then is obivious,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598
Denis Kolesnik denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59605
Bug ID: 59605
Summary: [4.9 Regression] error: wrong number of branch edges
after unconditional jump in bb 11
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59605
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598
--- Comment #13 from Denis Kolesnik denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12)
You want %c. This is not the correct place to ask questions about C
programming. This is a place to report bugs in GCC.
:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59606
Bug ID: 59606
Summary: Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines
re-entered.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59607
Bug ID: 59607
Summary: Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines
re-entered.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59608
Bug ID: 59608
Summary: Unable to build working poedit v.1.5.x using gcc 4.8.2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59608
--- Comment #1 from Janis je at ktf dot rtu.lv ---
Created attachment 31520
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31520action=edit
configure log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59608
Janis je at ktf dot rtu.lv changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31519|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48415
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59605
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29589
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57829
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cqfu at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59605
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Does this
---
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 0cf0a9d..07f9a86 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -24015,7 +24015,8 @@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35579
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2011-02-16 18:44:32 |2013-12-27
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41624
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42519
--- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A serious candidate for WONTFIX... Laurent?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50180
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50181
--- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org ---
gcc 4.6 is no longer maintained. Is there still a bug here to fix?
(The testcase of comment #1 works for me with r206195 on ppc64-linux.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53804
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59605
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg01907.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59607
vyf at princeton dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600
--- Comment #8 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
Created attachment 31522
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31522action=edit
Patch which inlines based on caller/callee attribute match
(In reply to Yury Gribov from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59609
Bug ID: 59609
Summary: LRA generates bad code for libgcc function udivmoddi4
on thumb1 target
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59609
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.9.0
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59609
--- Comment #1 from Terry Guo terry.guo at arm dot com ---
Here are some investigations. In the dump of IRA pass, we have jump insn like:
(jump_insn 31 24 172 5 (parallel [
(set (pc)
(if_then_else (lt (plus:SI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59609
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Terry Guo from comment #1)
Here are some investigations. In the dump of IRA pass, we have jump insn
like:
And this is why the old saying of reload not cannot reload a
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
ganesh.gopalasubraman...@amd.com wrote:
(get_amd_cpu): Handle AMD_BOBCAT, AMD_JAGUAR, AMDFAM15H_BDVER2 and
AMDFAM15H_BDVER3.
As mentioned earlier, we would like to stick with BTVER1 and BTVER2 instead
of using BOBCAT or
I'm sorry I didn't notice previous conversation. Please install ASAP.
Thanks Uros! Committed to revision 206210.
- Ganesh
Hello Uros,
On 23 Dec 17:46, Uros Bizjak wrote:
This round_expand_predicate is the predicate substitution I was
referred to in the review of 5/8. Please use it also in insn patterns,
perhaps renamed as round_predicate
This is drawback of substs. We bind given subst attribute to given subst
On Thursday 26 December 2013, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh wrote:
Hi,
(get_amd_cpu): Handle AMD_BOBCAT, AMD_JAGUAR, AMDFAM15H_BDVER2 and
AMDFAM15H_BDVER3.
As mentioned earlier, we would like to stick with BTVER1 and BTVER2 instead
of using BOBCAT or JAGUAR. Attached patch does the
Hi Honza,
We have combined generic32 and generic64 into generic. There is no need
to check generic anymore. Also we shouldn't change -mtune=i686 into
-mtune=generic. OK to install?
The i686-generic change was intended to get generic optimized code
for i686-linux configuration rather than
Hello,
On 23 Dec 17:26, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
So, OK for mainline, but I would kindly ask you to please wait a
couple of days for possible Richard's comments
When substituting constraints, please also substitute
Hi,
After my Intel processor name cleanup,
__attribute__ ((target(arch=corei7))) is translated to PROCESSOR_NEHALEM
mapped to M_INTEL_COREI7_NEHALEM. We used to hav
e __attribute__ ((target(arch=corei7)))
to cover M_INTEL_COREI7_. Now it only covers M_INTEL_COREI7_NEHALEM.
We have
Ping.
(Patch is slightly updated)
On 20 Dec 21:18, Ilya Verbin wrote:
Hi Jakub,
Could you please take a look at this patch for libgomp?
It adds new function GOMP_register_lib, that should be called from every
exec/lib with target regions (that was done in patch [1]). This function
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi Honza,
We have combined generic32 and generic64 into generic. There is no need
to check generic anymore. Also we shouldn't change -mtune=i686 into
-mtune=generic. OK to install?
The i686-generic change was intended to
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 2:25 PM, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
After my Intel processor name cleanup,
__attribute__ ((target(arch=corei7))) is translated to PROCESSOR_NEHALEM
mapped to M_INTEL_COREI7_NEHALEM. We used to hav
e __attribute__ ((target(arch=corei7)))
to cover
Hello!
Use the same definitions from common header.
2013-12-26 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/i386/cpuinfo.c (enum vendor_signatures): Remove.
(__cpu_indicator_init): Use signature_INTEL_ebx and signature_AMD_ebx
from cpuid.h to check vendor signatures.
No functional
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi Honza,
We have combined generic32 and generic64 into generic. There is no need
to check generic anymore. Also we shouldn't change -mtune=i686 into
-mtune=generic. OK to install?
The i686-generic change was
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi Honza,
We have combined generic32 and generic64 into generic. There is no need
to check generic anymore. Also we shouldn't change -mtune=i686 into
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT is left over for 32-bit target before --with-arch=
and --with-cpu= were added. Today, -mtune=xxx -march=xxx are
always passed to cc1 by GCC driver. If cc1 is run by hand and
-mtune=xxx -march=xxx aren't
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 8:06 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi Honza,
We have combined generic32 and generic64 into generic. There is no need
to
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this patch adds code to produce prologues/epilogues as suggested by Ondrej
Bilka
(I described more the approach in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg02082.html)
This patch is updated and cleaned up version
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 8:06 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi Honza,
We have
On 12/26/2013 12:11 AM, Andreas Tobler wrote:
On 21.12.13 18:27, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/20/2013 10:15 PM, Andreas Tobler wrote:
Ok for gcc trunk?
OK, thanks.
May I get this one down to 4.8 too? Not really needed, but for
completeness. Results will follow...
No objections from me.
Hi Honza,
r203937 may create jump_around_label earlier. But later code doesn't
check if jump_around_label exists. This patch fixes it. Tested
on Linux/x86-64. OK to install?
Thanks.
H.J.
--
gcc/
2013-12-26 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
PR target/59605
* config/i386/i386.c
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 05:10:06 -0800
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the patch I checked in. I will submit separate patches for
other parts.
Please be sure to update changes.html.
--
Ryan Hillpsn: dirtyepic_sk
gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org
2013/12/21 Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org:
Hello
Following this thread http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-11/msg00260.html
and this bug,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55189
I would like to propose the two following patches:
I am activating -Wreturn-type by defaut and add
Chung-Wu wrote:
But I notice your ChangeLog formatting is not correct.
You can refer to other entries in ChangeLog to refine yours,
and then resubmit the patch for review. :)
Or - use contrib/mklog to autogenerate template ChangeLog for you.
-Y
89 matches
Mail list logo
