Hello,
This ICE may have gotten lost in the noise of my own message.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2014-11/msg00094.html
(The code snippet might be invalid C)
$ gcc -std=gnu99 -O3 -S test.c
test.c: In function 'main':
test.c:3:5: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:30:05AM +0100, Mason wrote:
Hello,
This ICE may have gotten lost in the noise of my own message.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2014-11/msg00094.html
(The code snippet might be invalid C)
$ gcc -std=gnu99 -O3 -S test.c
test.c: In function 'main':
Hello Marek,
On 25/11/2014 09:47, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:30:05AM +0100, Mason wrote:
This ICE may have gotten lost in the noise of my own message.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2014-11/msg00094.html
(The code snippet might be invalid C)
$ gcc -std=gnu99 -O3 -S
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:19:21AM +0100, Mason wrote:
Aaah, you want me to post the bug report to BZ, not here...
Yep - the snippet + command-line options you posted was enough to reproduce
the bug. The GCC mailing list is not for reporting bugs.
When you have a minute, can you take a look
On 25/11/2014 10:27, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:19:21AM +0100, Mason wrote:
Aaah, you want me to post the bug report to BZ, not here...
Yep - the snippet + command-line options you posted was enough to reproduce
the bug. The GCC mailing list is not for reporting bugs.
On 16 November 2014 at 15:51, H.J. Lu wrote:
Hi,
Git tags are missing for GCC 4.9.1, 4.9.2, 4.8.3 and 4.7.4.
I can't create the tags but these are the release commits:
git tag gcc-4_9_2-release c1283af40b65f1ad862cf5b27e2d9ed10b2076b6
git tag gcc-4_9_1-release
On 15-09-14 18:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
libstdc++-v3/
* testsuite/Makefile.am (check_p_numbers0, check_p_numbers1,
check_p_numbers2, check_p_numbers3, check_p_numbers4,
check_p_numbers5, check_p_numbers6, check_p_numbers,
check_p_subdirs): New variables.
Hi,
I'm still a newbie to gcc porting and ask you for help.
I'm porting gcc to generate added hardware FPU unit to an existing architecture
(tile64).
Without the hardware FPU unit, soft-float is used to handle floating point
operations.
Now, arithmetic instructions using FPU is properly
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 08:18:39AM -0800, David Kang wrote:
(define_expand fix_sfsi2
The proper name is fixsfsi2, no underscore. You might want
fix_truncsfsi2 instead though.
Segher
Thank you very much.
It solves my problem. Now optab for the conversion is generated properly.
Is the logical operators described similarly?
I tried seqf2, cmpseqf2, and one_cmplseqf2 for eq of two floating point
numbers as it is shown below.
But none of them work.
(define_expand seqf2
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 03:27:40PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
This patch fixes that by ensuring that we print that unsupported message only
once.
The resulting test result comparison diff is:
2014-11-25 Tom de Vries t...@codesourcery.com
*
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:45:06AM -0800, David Kang wrote:
Is the logical operators described similarly?
I tried seqf2, cmpseqf2, and one_cmplseqf2 for eq of two floating
point numbers as it is shown below.
But none of them work.
(define_expand seqf2
[(set (match_operand:SI 0
On Nov 23, 2014, at 4:06 PM, FX fxcoud...@gmail.com wrote:
One question to build maintainers, and one patch submitted to top-level
configure.ac
So, not sure who wants to review this. From the darwin perspective, Ok.
On 25/11/14 20:37, Mike Stump wrote:
On Nov 23, 2014, at 4:06 PM, FX fxcoud...@gmail.com wrote:
One question to build maintainers, and one patch submitted to top-level
configure.ac
So, not sure who wants to review this. From the darwin perspective, Ok.
I mean from my limited viewpoint it
Thanks a lot.
As a newbie, I keep reading the gccint manual and the source code.
But, the document is not kind enough for a newbie to jump start in a short
amount of time.
Sometimes an advice from an expert gives a newbie a breakthrough.
I appreciate your help!
David
- Original Message
On 11/24/2014 06:47 AM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
All:
The optimization of reducing save and restore of the callee and caller saved
register has been the attention Of
increasing the performance of the benchmark. The callee saved registers is
saved at the entry and restore at the
exit of
On Nov 25, 2014, at 12:15 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 03:27:40PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
This patch fixes that by ensuring that we print that unsupported message
only once.
The resulting test result comparison diff is:
2014-11-25 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63877
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Nov 25 08:28:45 2014
New Revision: 218039
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218039root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/63877
* c-decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63877
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63970
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64058
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15272
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64066
Bug ID: 64066
Summary: [F2008] Wrongly accepts ; (semicolon) at ending a null
token
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64061
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64056
Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64059
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64060
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61402
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64060
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64067
Bug ID: 64067
Summary: ICE involving compound literal shenanigans
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64050
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 64060 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64067
--- Comment #1 from Mason mpeg.blue at free dot fr ---
Created attachment 34108
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34108action=edit
ICE diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64067
Mason mpeg.blue at free dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||polacek at redhat dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64056
--- Comment #2 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue Nov 25 09:48:47 2014
New Revision: 218041
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218041root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/64056
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64057
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64068
Bug ID: 64068
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: in remove_unreachable_nodes, at
ipa.c:546
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64068
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61925
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
On trunk I get
vector.c:6:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 3 2 4 2 (set (reg/v:TI 101 [ a ])
(mem/c:TI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 81 virtual-incoming-args)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63375
--- Comment #17 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Pranith Kumar from comment #16)
printf(%d\n, *(int *)(val1+4));
This is broken, you're invoking undefined behaviour.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64050
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34110
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34110action=edit
Suggested patch v1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63786
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61927
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmm, we store
MEM[(logical(kind=4) *)_227] = vect_patt_319.44_273;
...
MEM[(logical(kind=4) *)_227 + 4B] = vect_patt_318.52_169;
...
MEM[(logical(kind=4) *)_227 + 8B] =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61927
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A different possible fix is to re-order pattern recog back to before
analyzing data ref accesses. Vectorization then fails during SLP analysis.
I'm going to test both patches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 25 11:16:27 2014
New Revision: 218042
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218042root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR preprocessor/60436
* line-map.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61649
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||korbb at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Doh, so it is, I misread the test code.
Rainer, what does this print (when compiled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64055
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Revision r217101 is OK.
Not in my case: at r217915, the test FAILs for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61649
--- Comment #3 from Richard PALO richard at netbsd dot org ---
No. Prior to fixincludes, sys/feature_tests.h in SunOS looks like the
following:
#if (defined(__STDC__) defined(_STDC_C99))
#define _RESTRICT_KYWD restrict
#else
#define
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61649
--- Comment #4 from Richard PALO richard at netbsd dot org ---
The test/base/sys/feature_tests.h patch is as follows:
--- fixincludes/tests/base/sys/feature_tests.h.orig 2010-06-21
15:27:29.0 +
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63995
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
Patch removing duplicating bounds symbols is in review. With this patch
applied bootstrap goes till the end but there are lots of stage2 and stage3
comparison error. I looked
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63995
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63995
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63786
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 25 13:48:49 2014
New Revision: 218043
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218043root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-11-25 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63786
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64067
Mason mpeg.blue at free dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE involving compound |ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63853
tocarip.intel at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tocarip.intel at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64068
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Introduced by r217973:
commit ca92a2511ecb05fb7c84df998723c257f23b6ca7
Author: hubicka hubicka@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Date: Sat Nov 22 21:08:07 2014 +
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64067
Mason mpeg.blue at free dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62238
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is a tree sharing issue, it reproduces with -O3 and a single concatenated
source as well.
Index: gcc/tree-predcom.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61927
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 25 14:55:29 2014
New Revision: 218046
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218046root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-25 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61927
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63995
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 34112
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34112action=edit
-g0 problem reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64069
Bug ID: 64069
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE on allocating character array
with source
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
--- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
Created attachment 34111 [details]
patch
Can you try this?
Cool, fixed!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64050
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 25 15:16:27 2014
New Revision: 218048
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218048root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-25 Martin Liska mli...@suse.cz
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64060
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 25 15:16:27 2014
New Revision: 218048
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218048root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-25 Martin Liska mli...@suse.cz
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63995
--- Comment #6 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
For attached -g0 problem reproducer:
gcc pr63995-2.c -c -O2 -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds -g -o 1.o
gcc pr63995-2.c -c -O2 -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds -g0 -o 2.o
objdump_pl -d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64069
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks - so it looks as though the problem is in std::stod which is pretty
simple, and can be reduced to:
#include errno.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
int main()
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
--- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60449
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64069
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61743
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #19 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #18)
The -a option to go build means to rebuild all packages rather than using
the installed versions (see http://golang.org/cmd/go for documentation).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50770
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
--- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
Does the restrict stuff make any performance difference?
Not noticeable for the particular benchmark I'm running
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks - so it looks as though the problem is in std::stod which is pretty
simple,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64069
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58754
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63995
--- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
In chkpopt pass calls to bndmk are moved down to uses to decrease register
pressure. Debug info introduces new uses and therefore it affects a position
where bndmk calls appear.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64050
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61420
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Aha, of course.
Maybe we should just add this to the test for now?
// https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
// { dg-xfail-if { *-*-solaris* } { * } { } }
If 40411
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64070
Bug ID: 64070
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-42.C -std=gnu++11
scan-ipa-dump-times inline First type is base of
second 3
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Aha, of course.
Maybe we should just add this to the test for now?
//
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64070
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34113
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34113action=edit
Tree dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The issue seems that we fail to detect hybrid SLP here because
vect_detect_hybrid_slp_stmts walks immediate uses of SLP defs but those
do not reach pattern stmts but only original
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62250
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The gfortran command does not explicitly link with libatomic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 25 16:43:24 2014
New Revision: 218049
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218049root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-25 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64071
Bug ID: 64071
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/dollar_sym_1.f90 -O (test for
excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64071
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64071
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63851
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, I can reproduce the problem on x86_64 with following simple patch applied:
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-icf.c b/gcc/ipa-icf.c
index 4875dec..c985052 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-icf.c
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 64041 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64041
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 303 matches
Mail list logo
