https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65068
Bug ID: 65068
Summary: Improve rewriting for address type induction variables
in IVOPT
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59845
ArshaGCC arshamidi at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65070
Bug ID: 65070
Summary: libgomp calls syscall instruction directly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65066
Bug ID: 65066
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wformat=2
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Segher Boessenkool seg...@kernel.crashing.org writes:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 03:54:21PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Hale Wang hale.w...@arm.com writes:
Ping?
It's not a regression (or is it?), so it is
Hi Terry,
I still think this is stage1 material.
+ /* Don't combine if dest contains a user specified register and i3 contains
+ ASM_OPERANDS, because the user specified register (same with dest) in i3
+ would be replaced by the src of insn which might be different with
+ the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
This works as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53623
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Known
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65071
Bug ID: 65071
Summary: ICE on valid, sizeof...() of template template
parameter pack in return type
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53623
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brian at soulspark
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64941
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00913.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65024
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at
On February 14, 2015 5:08:23 AM CST, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 13/02/15 22:40, Cyd Haselton wrote:
Somehow these calls are passed to libc by the wrapper including the
dlopen() call...which fails because it should be passed to libdl on
android.
How the wrapper points to libc I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980
--- Comment #16 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #14)
Bernd, do you have a reliable way to test a patch, checking for aliasing
violations?
No, all I can do is run the test suite on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60526
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
Hi,
r220674 exposed a bug in ia64_in_small_data_p. After r220674, COMMON
symbols binds locally for executables. But ia64_in_small_data_p returns
true for COMMON symbols which are never in small data section. This patch
fixes it. OK for trunk?
H.J.
Since COMMON symbols are never in small
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65066
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34759|0 |1
is
The attached patch fixes an ICE building the code-saturne package and generally
improves the
code generated for floating point loads and stores. With the previous
implementation, it was not
possible to load a LO_SUM DLT address to a floating point register (e.g., for
an integer multiplication)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65070
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It is intentionally written that way.
Why would you want to use linux specific code on an OS that isn't linux?
On 02/14/2015 03:26 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 10/02/2015 22:46, Joseph Myers wrote:
It may make sense to define LTGT as exactly !UNEQ, and so quiet, but the
choice of definition is a matter of what's convenient for the
implementation (and which choice you make determines which existing code
Hello,
I propose a fix for PR60898, where a symbol is freed despite remaining
reachable in the symbol tree.
The problem comes from this code in resolve_symbol:
/* If we find that a flavorless symbol is an interface in one of the
parent namespaces, find its symtree in this
On 02/15/2015 09:48 AM, Mikael Morin wrote:
[*] I have a few failing testcases (also without the patch), namely the
following; does this ring a bell ?
FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90
FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_g0_7.f08
FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f90
FAIL: gfortran.dg/nan_7.f90
FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes104465
# of unexpected failures2
# of expected failures 162
# of unsupported tests 326
/opt/gcc/p_build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran version 5.0.0 20150215
(experimental) [trunk revision 220715p2a] (GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64548
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65070
--- Comment #2 from Nadav Har'El nyh at math dot technion.ac.il ---
Hi,
What was the intention behind this intentionally? As I mentioned above, I
believe the tiny performance saving of not calling the syscall() function are
minimal, because if I
Given that info...and in spite of my aforementioned limited knowledge I
went back to take another look at the source and found this in
libfakechroot.c
/bld/fakechrt/fakechroot-2.16 $ grep -C 4 dlsym src/libfakechroot.c
/* Lazily load function */
LOCAL fakechroot_wrapperfn_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64866
--- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org ---
This bug appears to be triggered because the RTS contains freertos.ads with
private with Interfaces;
package FreeRTOS with Pure is
...
s-taprob.ads and s-tposen.ads start with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64866
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64596
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
--- Comment #29 from sourcery at rouson dot net ---
Good news.
Hopefully you saw the email about the tutorial proposals. Strangely ISC asks
for 1/2 page CVs, which I interpret as half-page CVs (Karla was hoping they
meant 1-2 page, but I think
On Feb 13, 2015, at 11:25 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
2015-02-12 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR tree-optimization/65002
* gcc.dg/pr65002.C: New.
This test should have gone into g++.dg.
Into g++.dg/opt or g++.dg/ipa in particular.
Pre-approved if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53623
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 34767
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34767action=edit
A backport patch for 4.8 branch
I am testing this patch now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53623
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
This regression is only fixed in 4.9 and should be backported to 4.8
branch.
Unfortunately, r206418 introduced many regressions. Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59765
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 59765, which changed state.
Bug 59765 Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] [OOP] ICE on valid with finalizable array
components
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59765
What|Removed
13.02.2015 16:04, tassos_souris writes:
Compile with: g++-4.9 -std=c++14 -g -o main main.cpp
and run with ./main. I get segfault. gdb in bt shows that the segfault
happens inside unique_ptr destructor. So it is not a memory issue.
Also since the code runs with less size (i.e size=1000 no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64548
--- Comment #2 from simon at pushface dot org ---
See PR64866 for a similar problem/workround.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65067
Bug ID: 65067
Summary: regression on accessing volatile bit field
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component:
On 14.2.2015 03:10, Alan Modra wrote:
On both x86_64-linux and powerpc64-linux, a --disable-shared bootstrap
dies with linker errors when building libcc1.so. You can't build a
shared library using objects from the static libstdc++ (or any other
library built without -fpic/-fPIC).
OK, so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64793
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks!
If I'm not mistaken, it looks like there's an overall improvement of ~0.35%. I
think I'll go with it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51017
--- Comment #9 from Alexander Peslyak solar-gcc at openwall dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
Can you try GCC 4.9?
Yes. Bad news: things mostly became even worse. Same machine, same JtR
version, same test script as in my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64992
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65075
Bug ID: 65075
Summary: [5 Regression] constexpr regression
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65075
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64821
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51017
--- Comment #10 from Alexander Peslyak solar-gcc at openwall dot com ---
I decided to take a look at the generated code. Compared to 4.6.2, GCC 4.9.2
started generating lots of xorps, orps, andps, andnps where it previously
generated pxor, por,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64866
--- Comment #3 from simon at pushface dot org ---
Created attachment 34768
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34768action=edit
Revised demonstrator
FreeRTOS packages moved under System, per Arno’s recommendation. Still fails.
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015, Cyd Haselton wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Alexander Monakov amona...@ispras.ru
wrote:
Given that info...and in spite of my aforementioned limited knowledge I
went back to take another look at the source and found this in
libfakechroot.c
Hi,
+symtab_node::iterate_direct_aliases (unsigned i, ipa_ref *ref)
+{
+ ref_list.referring.iterate (i, ref);
+
+ if (ref ref-use != IPA_REF_ALIAS)
+return NULL;
+
+ return ref;
+}
it seems a little weird the out arg can return a non alias, and so if
you only want to look at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65059
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thank you Honza, patch works for.
Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64866
--- Comment #4 from simon at pushface dot org ---
(In reply to Arnaud Charlet from comment #2)
Visibility in the Ada runtime do not follow standard Ada rules. In other
words,
the Ada runtime isn't implemented in Ada, but in a different dialect
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Alexander Monakov amona...@ispras.ru wrote:
Given that info...and in spite of my aforementioned limited knowledge I
went back to take another look at the source and found this in
libfakechroot.c
/bld/fakechrt/fakechroot-2.16 $ grep -C 4 dlsym
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015, Cyd Haselton wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Cyd Haselton chasel...@gmail.com wrote:
*snip*
So to obtain the pointer to
dlopen the code like above can use dlsym(RTLD_DEFAULT, dlopen), but not
RTLD_NEXT (the loader precedes the fakeroot library in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65059
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Does the following help?
Index: ipa-comdats.c
===
--- ipa-comdats.c (revision 220606)
+++ ipa-comdats.c
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Alexander Monakov amona...@ispras.ru wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015, Cyd Haselton wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Alexander Monakov amona...@ispras.ru
wrote:
Given that info...and in spite of my aforementioned limited knowledge I
went back to take
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072
Bug ID: 65072
Summary: Segfault when parsing dectlype in trailing return type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072
uroc327 at cssbook dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uroc327 at cssbook dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|Archlinux Kernel 3.16.3,|
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Cyd Haselton chasel...@gmail.com wrote:
*snip*
So to obtain the pointer to
dlopen the code like above can use dlsym(RTLD_DEFAULT, dlopen), but not
RTLD_NEXT (the loader precedes the fakeroot library in the lookup chain).
*snip*
Just a quick update:
On Feb 13, 2015, at 2:24 PM, Jack Howarth howarth.at@gmail.com wrote:
Mike and FX,
Shouldn't we also apply…
Ok.
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Mon Dec 22 21:57:45 2014
New Revision: 219035
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219035root=gccview=rev
Log:
* lib/ubsan-dg.exp: Add library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64548
--- Comment #4 from simon at pushface dot org ---
(In reply to Arnaud Charlet from comment #3)
I would suggest you do not use 'private with' if you write your own runtime,
since this isn't supported by the compiler when building the runtime.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61309
--- Comment #5 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st ---
hmmm, I added t-freebsd to the tmake list in libgcc/config.host for dragonfly.
I thought it would fix the problem but I'm still seeing hidden symbol errors
for __cpu_model
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65069
Bug ID: 65069
Summary: [SH] Calculate constants
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
patch fixing comment #7
This patch breaks bootstrap:
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=FC --mode=compile /opt/gcc/p_build/./gcc/gfortran
-B/opt/gcc/p_build/./gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65074
Bug ID: 65074
Summary: [5 Regression] r220674 broke C++ PIEs
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65074
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment
Hi,
+symtab_node::iterate_direct_aliases (unsigned i, ipa_ref *ref)
+{
+ ref_list.referring.iterate (i, ref);
+
+ if (ref ref-use != IPA_REF_ALIAS)
+return NULL;
+
+ return ref;
+}
it seems a little weird the out arg can return a non alias, and so if
you only want
Snapshot gcc-5-20150215 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20150215/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
Hi Oleg!
Yes, I will simply run a manual build in the following days and just make sure
nothing is thrown away. I finally have my very own SH4 board now and I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65073
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65024
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The ICE for the reduced test in comment 2 appeared between revisions
r207428 (2014-02-03, OK) and r207996 (2014-02-21, ICE).
Started at r207986.
On February 15, 2015 12:57:18 PM CST, Alexander Monakov amona...@ispras.ru
wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015, Cyd Haselton wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Cyd Haselton chasel...@gmail.com
wrote:
*snip*
So to obtain the pointer to
dlopen the code like above can use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65074
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 34770
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34770action=edit
A patch
Please try this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64992
--- Comment #4 from Ishiura Lab Compiler Team ishiura-compiler at ml dot
kwansei.ac.jp ---
FYI, clang-3.6 -O3 seems to do the same optimization on org.c as well as on
opt.c.
The stdlib.h header in AIX 4.3 does not correctly declare strtof with
a const char* argument. Users are building the latest releases of GCC
on AIX 4.3 The appended patch from Richard G Daniel uses fixincludes
to correct the declaration.
Okay?
Thanks, David
PR bootstrap/48009
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53623
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65073
Bug ID: 65073
Summary: dynamic character assignment gives wrong result
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sh*-*-*
Looks good to me.
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 12:49 PM, David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com wrote:
The stdlib.h header in AIX 4.3 does not correctly declare strtof with
a const char* argument. Users are building the latest releases of GCC
on AIX 4.3 The appended patch from Richard G Daniel uses
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Would it be possible for you to pull a precompiled source from the build via
the '-save-temps' option?
Hi,
This is a backport of the patch for PR middle-end/53623 plus all bug
fixes caused by it. Tested on Linux/x86-32, Linux/x86-64 and x32. OK
for 4.8 branch?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 469ee31..44bf322 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@
Hello,
I'm trying to do a live update of a function without killing or
stopping the program. This is a single threaded application which runs
something similar to the below code. Maximum time is spent in the
while(1) loop.
What i want to do is compile with gcc-4.8 with -pg and -mfentry and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64432
--- Comment #18 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34771
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34771action=edit
A test case
Current results with attached test case.
$ ./a.out
KIND=1: 34 1 127
I noticed a while back when searching for something in the table of
contents for the GCC manual that most section names used Title Case,
but some only capitalized the first word, or not even that. This patch
is the result of me going through the whole ToC and trying to fix
everything to use
Ping.
Original Message
Subject: [PATCH PR64820] Fix ASan UAR detection fails on 32-bit targets
if SSP is enabled.
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:03:54 +0400
From: Maxim Ostapenko m.ostape...@partner.samsung.com
To: GCC Patches gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
CC: Yury Gribov
On Tuesday 2015-02-10 19:15, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
I've checked it in as obvious.
-Sandra
2015-02-10 David Wohlferd d...@limegreensocks.com
Sandra Loosemore san...@codesourcery.com
gcc/
* doc/extend.texi (Loop-Specific Pragmas): Fix grammar error.
That's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980
--- Comment #18 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #17)
I think this updated patch fixes all mentioned test cases.
Confirmed, bootstrapped and regtested cleanly.
but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65071
--- Comment #1 from Mikhail Maltsev maltsevm at gmail dot com ---
A few more comments. I wrote that GCC 5.0 segfaults. That's actually not true,
I could not reproduce segfault on checked builds (only release version of
4.9.2), but never the less
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55701
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
I think this updated patch fixes all mentioned test cases.
Confirmed, bootstrapped and regtested cleanly.
but there are many regressions, which would need to be fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61538
Joshua Kinard kumba at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.0 |4.9.3
Known
94 matches
Mail list logo
