On 19.01.17 00:33, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/18/2017 11:43 AM, Andreas Tobler wrote:
Hi all,
I have the following issue here on aarch64-*-freebsd:
(sorry if the format is hardly readable)
..
/export/devel/net/src/gcc/head/gcc/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c: In
function 'void
Just one suggestion:
What about configure option like --with-version-convert where one could specify
actual conversion?
I have used conversion sed -e 's:\.::2g' for DJGPP to leave only the first dot in version for
complying with MS-DOS file name restrictions. The implementation of that was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77346
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2016-11-11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79144
Bug ID: 79144
Summary: cmpstrsi optimization breaks glibc
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Hi all,
Libgcc unwinder currently does not do any verification of pointers
which it chases
on stack. In practice this not so rarely causes segfaults when unwinding
on corrupted stacks (e.g. when when trying to print diagnostic on
fatal error) [1].
Ironically this usually happens in error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79139
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79143
Bug ID: 79143
Summary: [7 Regression][new inheriting constructors] inheriting
constructor fails with brace initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77499
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78559
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78634
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78972
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79095
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79125
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79125
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #22 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Thu Jan 19 02:23:35 2017
New Revision: 244609
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244609=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/78516
* config/rs6000/spe.md (mov_si_e500_subreg0):
On 1/18/17 8:04 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 02:38:30PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
Is this ok for trunk?
This looks good, please apply. Thanks,
Thanks, committed as revision 244609.
Peter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79131
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79140
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 02:38:30PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> This is a partial patch for PR78516. This patch fixes some broken constraints
> in spe.md that were exposed by the rs6000 port's switch to using LRA.
> In order to change some of the constraints to outputs from inout, I had
> to
On 01/18/2017 09:48 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
> By default, wildcard support on Windows for programs compiled with mingw
> depends on how the mingw runtime was configured. This means if one wants
> to build GCC for Windows with a consistent behavior with Wildcard
> (enabled or disabled) the
This patch changes the default options enabled for the PowerPC -mcpu=power9
option to include the undocumented -mpower9-minmax option. This option enables
MIN/MAX instructions that do not require -ffast-math or -fhonor-nans.
I also changed the minimum option requirements for IEEE 128-bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79142
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79142
--- Comment #1 from layer at known dot net ---
And the code:
#include
/* whatever the shift in badexample does,
* the function should never return 1
*/
long
badexample(unsigned long iv)
{
long ov = ((long)(1)) << ((iv & 0x3f) + 1);
if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79142
Bug ID: 79142
Summary: bit shift + compare returns wrong value
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79039
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:34:00PM -0600, Pat Haugen wrote:
> The following patch updates a few latencies in the Power9 machine
> description. Bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64le with no new regressions. Ok for
> trunk?
Okay, thanks!
Segher
> 2017-01-18 Pat Haugen
>
>
On 01/18/2017 11:43 AM, Andreas Tobler wrote:
Hi all,
I have the following issue here on aarch64-*-freebsd:
(sorry if the format is hardly readable)
..
/export/devel/net/src/gcc/head/gcc/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c: In
function 'void aarch64_elf_asm_destructor(rtx, int)':
Thank you, David, and the rest of the Steering Committee, for
welcoming us into the GCC community. I look forward to working
together.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 7:50 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
> accepted the
On 01/17/2017 05:41 AM, Moore, Catherine wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Matthew Fortune [mailto:matthew.fort...@imgtec.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 4:35 AM
>>
...
>> Thanks for the comments.
>>
>> Having thought further I agree we can safely ignore DSP indexed load
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55691
Geir Johansen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478
--- Comment #16 from Joel Sherrill ---
Thanks for all the feedback. With this patch, it now builds. Is the style of
change to configure.host OK?
I need to check how far back this impacts. A user reported it with a released
gcc. Since we don't
Hi,
Pat Haugen pointed out that the vbpermq instruction should preferably
have its "type" attribute set to vecperm, rather than vecsimple. This
patch makes that change.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with no
regressions, committed as obvious.
Thanks,
Bill
2017-01-18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79040
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79127
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
On x86_64-linux and i686-linux it passed bootstrap/regtest and still defines
HAVE_AVX512F, which is desirable there.
Hi,
A previous patch mistakenly added a #define of vec_cntlz which should
have been a #define of vec_cnttz. This patch fixes that.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with no
regressions, committed as obvious.
Thanks,
Bill
2017-01-18 Bill Schmidt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79040
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Jan 18 22:29:22 2017
New Revision: 244602
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244602=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-01-18 Bill Schmidt
PR target/79040
On 01/17/2017 09:00 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
I think the ABI should set a baseline for each architecture, and the
baseline decides whether something is inlinable or not. Thus, the
x86_64 ABI would make __int128 operations not imlinable (because of the
issues with cmpxchg16b, see above).
If
>
> 2016-12-19 Martin Liska
>
> * cgraphclones.c (cgraph_node::create_virtual_clone):
> Create either IPA_REF_LOAD of IPA_REF_READ depending on
> whether new_tree is a VAR_DECL or an ADDR_EXPR.
> * ipa-cp.c (create_specialized_node): Add reference just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79141
Bug ID: 79141
Summary: std::pair p = {}; fails to compile due to
ambiguous overload
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58452
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
>> This fix follows the same approach that glibc uses to disable TSX on
>> processors on which it is broken. TSX can also be disabled through a
>> microcode update on these processors, but glibc consensus is that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69738
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:52:32PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> Sorry for not noticing this earlier, but ...
>
> > +#ifdef __LP64__
> > +typedef unsigned long long CUdeviceptr;
> > +#else
> > +typedef unsigned CUdeviceptr;
> > +#endif
>
> I think this #ifdef doesn't do the right thing on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79140
Bug ID: 79140
Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/ssp-1.c fails starting with its
introduction in r244562
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79139
Bug ID: 79139
Summary: warning: argument 1 null where non-null expected
[-Wnonnull]
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:48:28PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > This fix follows the same approach that glibc uses to disable TSX on
> > processors on which it is broken. TSX can also be disabled through a
> > microcode update on these processors, but glibc consensus is that it
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55598
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55086
lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 09:50 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:05 PM, David Malcolm
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 14:58 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:28 PM, David Malcolm <
> > > dmalc...@redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
>> This fix follows the same approach that glibc uses to disable TSX on
>> processors on which it is broken. TSX can also be disabled through a
>> microcode update on these processors, but glibc consensus is that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069
lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On 18/01/2017 18:43, Andrew Burgess wrote:
* Mike Stump [2017-01-17 10:49:30 -0800]:
On Jan 17, 2017, at 3:30 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
This patch revamps the arc's header file by means of using separate
headers for different tool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79037
--- Comment #5 from Michael Karcher ---
The root issue now is that the ABI gcc implements on m68k is incompatible with
the Go runtime shipped with gcc.
The Go runtime uses the lowest two bits in the type information pointer as
flags (called
Hello!
> This fix follows the same approach that glibc uses to disable TSX on
> processors on which it is broken. TSX can also be disabled through a
> microcode update on these processors, but glibc consensus is that it
> cannot be detected reliably whether the microcode update has been
>
Fixed in revision 244601.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79131
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov ---
This is a bug in LRA now. LRA should have reloaded the destination or the
operand as they conflicts in insn 31 (the destination is an early clobbered
operand). IRA does not take early clobbers into
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> 2017-01-17 16:51 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:03:08PM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>>> > I've played a bit w/ SDE. And looks like operands are not early clobber:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069
--- Comment #12 from lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: lkrupp
Date: Wed Jan 18 21:41:48 2017
New Revision: 244601
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244601=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-01-18 Louis Krupp
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55086
--- Comment #2 from lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: lkrupp
Date: Wed Jan 18 21:41:48 2017
New Revision: 244601
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244601=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-01-18 Louis Krupp
PR
The jit testcase test-nested-loops.c was crashing.
Root cause is that deep inside loop optimization we're now exposing
this call within fold-const.c which wasn't being hit before:
4082 /* Compute the mask to access the bitfield. */
4083 unsigned_type = lang_hooks.types.type_for_size
On 01/18/2017 11:08 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
PR 79121 is a silent wrong code regression where, when generating a
shift from an extended value moving from one to two machine registers,
the type of the right shift is for the most significant word should be
determined by the signedness
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79138
Bug ID: 79138
Summary: ICE when trying to do template auto
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68666
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68666
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 18 21:05:12 2017
New Revision: 244599
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244599=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/68666 - member variable template-id
* typeck.c
The problem was that finish_class_member_access_expr got missed when
we added variable templates. 68666 is a report of how this affects
concepts; the patch adds both concepts and non-concepts testcases.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61729
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
DejaGnu's provides decls of various inline functions,
of which the jit testsuite uses "pass", "fail" and "note".
The jit testcase test-threads.c jumps through some hoops to make
these functions threadsafe, using macros to rename the implementation
in dejagnu.h, giving them a "dejagnu_" prefix,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68666
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
This is a partial patch for PR78516. This patch fixes some broken constraints
in spe.md that were exposed by the rs6000 port's switch to using LRA.
In order to change some of the constraints to outputs from inout, I had
to change some of the instructions we emit to equivalent forms.
Joseph has
This fix follows the same approach that glibc uses to disable TSX on
processors on which it is broken. TSX can also be disabled through a
microcode update on these processors, but glibc consensus is that it
cannot be detected reliably whether the microcode update has been
applied. Thus, we just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79109
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79051
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478
--- Comment #15 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #14)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
> > The problem is config/i386/rtemself.h has
> >
> > #define LONG_DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE (TARGET_80387 ? 80 : 64)
> >
> >
Hello Jakub,
Sorry for not noticing this earlier, but ...
> +#ifdef __LP64__
> +typedef unsigned long long CUdeviceptr;
> +#else
> +typedef unsigned CUdeviceptr;
> +#endif
I think this #ifdef doesn't do the right thing on MinGW.
Would it be fine to simplify it? In my code I have
typedef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70530
--- Comment #4 from Askar Safin ---
DR 2468 says that after "a = std::move (a)" state of a is unspecified. So
three-move self-swap will be unspecified, too. You just said, that self-swap is
not undefined, i. e. it is defined. Okey, so to make it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79137
--- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt ---
vec_perm_const is one of the standard pattern names, that gets expanded from
a middle-end vector permute.
As suggested by Segher, we have to use code iterator to iterate RTX
pattern through zero- and sign-extract for 8 bit inserts. In a similar
way, we can use any_shiftrt in a RTX pattern involving 8-bit inserts.
While it would be nice to have a middle-end perform relevant
simplifications, these two
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78488
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
This patch fixes an ICE with inherited default ctor and a local decl.
In such a case we don't have any conv args (just the object expression,
handled differently). Thus 'num_convs-1' is -1 and we seg fault at:
cand->convs[cand->num_convs-1]->ellipsis_p
do just check it's non-zero first.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78488
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Jan 18 19:27:52 2017
New Revision: 244592
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244592=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/78488
* call.c (build_over_call): When checking ellipsis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78952
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Jan 18 19:24:30 2017
New Revision: 244591
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244591=gcc=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/78952
* config/i386/i386.md
Joe Seymour writes:
>> the msp430 -mlarge multilib failing to build with...
>>> configure: error: Unknown underlying type for size_t
>>> make[1]: *** [configure-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 1
>
> This is still reproducible.
FYI the underlying type is uint20_t
I think I've
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79137
Bug ID: 79137
Summary: Improve powerpc vector permutes
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79037
--- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Disabling the Go garbage collector fixes this particular crash:
(sid-m68k-sbuild)root@jessie64:~# GOGC=off ./hello-world
Hello World!
(sid-m68k-sbuild)root@jessie64:~#
So it seems GOGC is not
On 17/08/2016 12:19, Joe Seymour wrote:
> fail to build with...
>
>> ../../../../../libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cow-stdexcept.cc:274:3: error: static
>> assertion failed: Pointers must be 32 bits or 64 bits wide
>> static_assert(sizeof(uint64_t) == sizeof(void*)
>
> The assert fails because msp430
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:21:40AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:50:08PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > I have checked this on a little endian power8 system (64-bit only), a big
> > endian power8 system (64-bit only), and a big endian power7 system (both
> >
Hi Jerry,
and also for this many thanks. Committed as r244590.
Regards,
Andre
PS: Hopefully this mail is not declared SPAM by the mail-host like the last one.
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:13:10 -0800
Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> On 01/18/2017 08:54 AM, Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79132
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79136
Bug ID: 79136
Summary: read outside of buffer in char*
std::__copy_move::__copy_m(unsigned char const*, unsigned
Hi all,
I have the following issue here on aarch64-*-freebsd:
(sorry if the format is hardly readable)
..
/export/devel/net/src/gcc/head/gcc/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c: In
function 'void aarch64_elf_asm_destructor(rtx, int)':
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79135
Bug ID: 79135
Summary: null pointer dereference in
std::_Bit_reference::operator=(bool)
(stl_bvector.h:87)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79134
Bug ID: 79134
Summary: Implicit declaration of free due to missing include
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69301
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk. Backports to follow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69301
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 18 18:36:45 2017
New Revision: 244588
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244588=gcc=rev
Log:
PR69301 don't assume atomic can default construct T
PR libstdc++/69301
This fixes an invalid assumption that std::atomic can default
construct a T. It also fixes some variables called "tmp" with
non-uglified names.
PR libstdc++/69301
* include/std/atomic (atomic::load, atomic::exchange): Use
aligned buffer instead of default-initialized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79040
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|meissner at gcc dot gnu.org|wschmidt at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
Hi Jerry,
thanks for the fast review. Committed as r244587.
Regards,
Andre
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 09:38:40 -0800
Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> On 01/18/2017 04:26 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > the patch I proposed for this pr unfortunately did not catch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70696
--- Comment #11 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Wed Jan 18 18:35:41 2017
New Revision: 244587
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244587=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2017-01-17 Andre Vehreschild
The following patch updates a few latencies in the Power9 machine description.
Bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64le with no new regressions. Ok for trunk?
-Pat
2017-01-18 Pat Haugen
* config/rs6000/power9.md (power9-alu): Remove 'cmp' type and add
Jason,
I've figured out what's happening here. Just not sure of the most
prudent way to fix it.
struct no_destr {
no_destr() = default;
protected:
~no_destr() = default;
};
void *Foo ()
{
return new no_destr ();
}
no_destr is a type for which the default ctor is not DECL_ARTIFICIAL,
1 - 100 of 290 matches
Mail list logo