https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107316
--- Comment #2 from vfdff ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I suspect this is just a dup of bug 106583 and will be fixed by the patch
> which was submitted recently
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107359
Bug ID: 107359
Summary: [aarch64] should avoid the punpklo/punpkhi compare to
llvm
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
On 10/22/22 11:54, LIU Hao wrote:
This allows building libobjc and enabling Objective-C. Tested against
GCC 12 branch on i686-w64-mingw32.
Done, pushed to master branch.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 8:33 AM Jacek Caban via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On 2022-10-21 11:44, Eric Botcazou via Libstdc++ wrote:
> >>>/How does this compare with Eric B's proposal at
> >>>/>>>/https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2019-06/msg01840.html ?
> >>>/>>//>>/My proposal was to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105823
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the parentheses changes from a xvalue to an rvalue in C++11+ IIRC which
might be why there is an effect here ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106095
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104490
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104056
--- Comment #3 from cqwrteur ---
Can --disable-hosted-libstdcxx disable Link tests are not allowed after
GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. on all targets???
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107358
--- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Created attachment 53757 [details]
> gcc13-pr107358.patch
>
> Untested fix.
The proposed patch fixes libjxl-0.7.0 build for me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102258
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
Snapshot gcc-12-20221022 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/12-20221022/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 12 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106107
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106109
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.2
Summary|Internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101991
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107356
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
long double uses x87 and reg-stack.cc still. So a target issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107172
--- Comment #45 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yes, that is fine afaics.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105774
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
And one for short:
constexpr signed short f(void){
signed short x = 0x7fff;
return ++x;
}
int main() {
constexpr auto _ = f();
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105774
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Bogus overflow in constant |Bogus overflow in constant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99241
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Greeley
---
Created attachment 53759
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53759=edit
The pre processed header I tried to import into my module and the module code
This is the preprocessed header,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99241
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Greeley
---
When I say the compiler segfaulted, it is similar too:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99238
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99241
Christopher Greeley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cgreeley at student dot
On Sat, 22 Oct 2022, Péntek Imre via Gcc wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/backends.html
by "Architecture does not have a single condition code register" do you mean
it has none or do you mean it has multiple?
Either.
If you look at the examples below, there is a C for riscv, which has 0,
and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88974
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> And this updated patch, while it bootstrapped, had quite a few testsuite
> regressions. So, I'm afraid I don't know where would in some cases the
> src_loc be
Hi,
https://gcc.gnu.org/backends.html
by "Architecture does not have a single condition code register" do you
mean it has none or do you mean it has multiple?
Thank you in advance for the clarification.
--
With regards: Imre PÉNTEK
Üdvözlettel: PÉNTEK Imre
E-mail: pentek.i...@gmail.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107342
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #53749|0 |1
is obsolete|
Pushed.
Gerald
---
htdocs/index.html | 68 ---
htdocs/news.html | 68 +++
2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/index.html b/htdocs/index.html
index 39060016..f45b9664
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107358
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-22
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 01:51:55PM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > > BTW: Perhaps znver1.md is not the right filename anymore, since it hosts
> > > all four Zen schedulers.
> > >
> > > I have renamed the file to znver.md in this revision, PFA.
> > > Thank you for the review, we
On 10/21/22 09:29, Qing Zhao wrote:
Hi,
(FAM below refers to Flexible Array Members):
I need inputs on how to handle the combination of -fstrict-flex-arrays +
-Warray-bounds.
Our initial goal is to update -Warray-bounds with multiple levels of
-fstrict-flex-arrays=N
to issue warnings
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Thanks, changed and committed.
This (commit 3be1a28f58d6063258407b0751e8fb55df4749c8) introduced a new
which is deprecated HTML.
Below is the straightforward adjustment I just pushed.
Gerald
commit
[-Inf, +Inf] +-NAN gets normalized as VARYING. There is a test that
drops the NAN possibility, and tests that the range is no longer
VARYING but [-Inf, +Inf]. However, for -ffinite-math-only targets
(Vax, RX, etc) the range would still be VARYING because the VARYING
range never had a NAN to
PING.
soe...@soeren-tempel.net wrote:
> From: Sören Tempel
>
> On glibc-based systems, off_t is a 32-bit type on 32-bit systems and a
> 64-bit type on 64-bit systems by default. However, on systems using musl
> libc off_t is unconditionally a 64-bit type. As such, it is insufficient
> to use a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107358
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jakub at redhat dot com|
--- Comment #1 from Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106644
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
As for implementation, I'd say in call.cc (add_candidates) we could do
something like:
if ((flags & (LOOKUP_REWRITTEN | LOOKUP_REVERSE))
&& DECL_OVERLOADED_OPERATOR_IS (fn, EQ_EXPR))
{
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106644
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The A-J cases are from the paper to be precise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107358
Bug ID: 107358
Summary: [13 Regression] i686-linux: Since
r13-3290-g98e341130f8798 code fails to build
libjxl-0/7.0 (vector float code)
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106644
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106799
--- Comment #4 from michal at sawicz dot net ---
Created attachment 53756
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53756=edit
Preprocessed header source
I believe that should be it.
This allows building libobjc and enabling Objective-C. Tested against GCC 12
branch on i686-w64-mingw32.
--
Best regards,
LIU Hao
From c05cceb2f3baa96c9381be38717bdf6f1f3adb76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: LIU Hao
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 17:31:46 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] libgcc: Update
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107357
Bug ID: 107357
Summary: [RISC-V]RVV broken with zve32x/f
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107353
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
Emulated TLS targets can test targetm.have_tls.
The patch below fixes the fails on Fortran for x86_64-darwin, libgomp in test
now.
I do not really like that it means pulling in the whole of target.h, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107309
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107309
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107356
Bug ID: 107356
Summary: -fcompare-debug failure (length) with
-fsanitize=undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107353
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host|powerpc64le-linux-gnu |powerpc64le-linux-gnu,*-*-d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107317
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 3:46 PM Takayuki 'January June' Suwa
wrote:
>
> This patch offers an additional allocable register by RA for the CALL0
> ABI.
>
> > Register a0 holds the return address upon entry to a function, but
> > unlike the windowed register ABI, it is not reserved for this purpose
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106717
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
Indeed, this particular case works now.
48 matches
Mail list logo
