https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114323
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prathamesh3492 at
git commit g:7d2d6e1ab566f8fa5e87028b7ab9da8d5d0a1369
gcc-descr r13-8439-g7d2d6e1ab566f8
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 15 04:27:49 UTC 2024
Andrew Pinski writes:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 9:36 PM Andi Kleen wrote:
>>
>>
>> musttail support for C/C++
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/643867.html
>>
>>
>> Support constexpr for asm statements in C++
>>
>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114347
--- Comment #2 from Paul Eggert ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I am not so sure that 257.0bf16 gets rounded to 256.
It should get rounded to 256, since 257 has no exact representation in __bf16
and 256 is the closest
git commit g:d7d05824ae68da24908d97a10b9ec59d08f75a90
gcc-descr r14-9486-gd7d05824ae68da
power8
Linux 5.4.0-172-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 15 02:48:14 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114347
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, I am not so sure that 257.0bf16 gets rounded to 256.
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Mar 14 18:05:20 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9481-g6cf4286ff94)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cb1010a
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu arch14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114347
Bug ID: 114347
Summary: wrong constant folding when casting __bf16 to int
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 9:36 PM Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>
> musttail support for C/C++
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/643867.html
>
>
> Support constexpr for asm statements in C++
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/643933.html
Both of these were
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81482
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
musttail support for C/C++
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/643867.html
Support constexpr for asm statements in C++
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/643933.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81759
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-08-08 00:00:00 |2024-3-14
--- Comment #4 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81759
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Daniel Fruzynski from comment #2)
> Looks that __builtin_ffs does not check if input value is nonzero at all.
> Assembler code for following code also has unnecessary instructions:
>
> [code]
>
git commit g:d7d05824ae68da24908d97a10b9ec59d08f75a90
gcc-descr r14-9486-gd7d05824ae68da
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 15 02:58:21 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114346
Bug ID: 114346
Summary: vectorizer generates the same IV twice
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114345
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114345
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83777
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2018-01-11 00:00:00 |2024-3-14
Status|WAITING
git commit g:7d2d6e1ab566f8fa5e87028b7ab9da8d5d0a1369
gcc-descr r13-8439-g7d2d6e1ab566f8
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.8.0-0.rc6.20240229git805d849d7c3c.51.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114345
Bug ID: 114345
Summary: FRE missing knowledge of semantics of IFN loads
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70268
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joerg at netbsd dot org
--- Comment #19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47047
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88823
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks to be fixed on the trunk.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:42 PM Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>
> Don't enable excess lanes when inverting vector bit-masks smaller than the
> integer mode. This is yet another case of wrong-code due to mishandling
> of oversized bitmasks.
>
> This issue shows up in vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s278.c and
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88926
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2019-01-21 00:00:00 |2024-3-14
--- Comment #3 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89567
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #6 from Andrew
Regressions on master at commit r14-9469 vs commit r14-9458 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)
New passes:
10728
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-intel64/bld/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1
20240314 (experimental) [master r14-9469-g9349aefa1df] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
=== gfortran Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes6971
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43473
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29860
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
git commit g:d7d05824ae68da24908d97a10b9ec59d08f75a90
gcc-descr r14-9486-gd7d05824ae68da
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.8.0-0.rc6.20240229git805d849d7c3c.51.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
unexpected failures125
# of unexpected successes 27
# of expected failures 1556
# of unsupported tests 4078
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-ia32/bld/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1
20240314 (experimental) [master r14-9483-g6dbf0d252f6] (GCC)
==
Regressions on master at commit r14-9483 vs commit r14-9469 on Linux/i686
New failures:
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr104601.C -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr104601.C -O1 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr104601.C -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin
git commit g:f51018ba255198aa342c2c7bb5e826e9a671f0a1
gcc-descr r11-11280-gf51018ba255198
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 15 01:51:34 UTC 2024
git commit g:f51018ba255198aa342c2c7bb5e826e9a671f0a1
gcc-descr r11-11280-gf51018ba255198
power8
Linux 5.4.0-172-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 15 01:21:36 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111555
Fangrui Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i at maskray dot me
--- Comment #5 from
On Linux/x86_64,
df483ebd24689a3bebfae2089637a00eca0e5a12 is the first bad commit
commit df483ebd24689a3bebfae2089637a00eca0e5a12
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date: Mon Feb 26 13:17:13 2024 +
libstdc++: Add nodiscard in
caused
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr104601.C -O0 (test for excess
On Linux/x86_64,
df483ebd24689a3bebfae2089637a00eca0e5a12 is the first bad commit
commit df483ebd24689a3bebfae2089637a00eca0e5a12
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date: Mon Feb 26 13:17:13 2024 +
libstdc++: Add nodiscard in
caused
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr104601.C -O0 (test for excess
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Mar 13 15:54:20 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9453-g74bca21db31)
Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute
XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1
Hi
2024. március 13., szerda 12:43 keltezéssel, Jonathan Wakely
írta:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 23:36, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:
> >
> > Previously, calling erase(key) on both std::map and std::set
> > would execute that same code that std::multi{map,set} would.
> > However, doing that is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114334
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 9:17 AM Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Ken Matsui wrote:
>
> > This patch implements built-in trait for std::is_invocable.
> >
> > gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * cp-trait.def: Define __is_invocable.
> > * constraint.cc (diagnose_trait_expr): Handle
git commit g:c1f6690b821f06616d442d732b24473d91eca66a
gcc-descr r14-9485-gc1f6690b821f06
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 15 00:22:36 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110027
--- Comment #15 from Hongtao Liu ---
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647604.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114343
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
> Shouldn't a major user-facing change like this be discussed in a PR against
> https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc/ or
> https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/rvv-intrinsic-doc before or concurrent with
> compiler implementation?
I think Kito is working on the spec doc already.
Hi Kito
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114344
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note __alignof__ might say 1, but alignof vs what GCC knows the alignment of
the decl are 2 different things.
# of unexpected successes 27
# of expected failures 1556
# of unsupported tests 4063
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-ia32/bld/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1
20240314 (experimental) [master-ia32 r14-9483-g6dbf0d252f6] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
Regressions on master at commit r14-9483 vs commit r14-9469 on Linux/i686
New failures:
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr104601.C -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr104601.C -O1 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr104601.C -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 15 01:00:11 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9485-gc1f6690b821)
Target is pru-unknown-elf
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target pru-sim
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-11.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114344
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Changes from v1: Some correction about ChangeLog format.
There's some unused/redundant definitions inside LoongArch target support
codes, these patches make a simple cleanup. Regression test passed.
Chenghui Pan (3):
LoongArch: Remove unused/useless definitions.
LoongArch: Change
These macros are completely same in definition, so we can keep the previous one
and eliminate later one.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
(loongarch_hard_regno_mode_ok_uncached): Combine UNITS_PER_FP_REG and
UNITS_PER_FPREG macros.
This function is always return true at the end of function implementation,
so the return value is useless.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/loongarch/lasx.md (vec_cmp): Remove checking
of loongarch_expand_vec_cmp()'s return value.
(vec_cmpu): Ditto.
*
This patch removes some unnecessary definitions of target hook functions
according to the documentation of GCC.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/loongarch/loongarch-protos.h
(loongarch_cfun_has_cprestore_slot_p): Delete.
(loongarch_adjust_insn_length): Delete.
git commit g:caabffc463db169e4a54deade79abe0888df05b5
gcc-descr r12-10215-gcaabffc463db16
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.8.0-0.rc6.20240229git805d849d7c3c.51.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106119
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] Bogus |[12 Regression] Bogus
(test for excess
errors)
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes178055
# of unexpected failures148
# of unexpected successes 12
# of expected failures 1597
# of unsupported tests 4965
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106238
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 regression] |[12 regression] Inline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106342
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:46 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 8:42 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 8:32 AM Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 3:22 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 2:33 AM liuhongt wrote:
Pushed to r14-9486.
在 2024/3/14 上午9:26, Chenghui Pan 写道:
The behavior of non-zero unused bits in xvpermi.q instruction's
third operand is undefined on LoongArch, according to our
discussion (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83540),
we think that keeping original insn operand as
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7d05824ae68da24908d97a10b9ec59d08f75a90
commit r14-9486-gd7d05824ae68da24908d97a10b9ec59d08f75a90
Author: Chenghui Pan
Date: Thu Mar 14 09:26:54 2024 +0800
LoongArch: Remove masking process for operand 3 of xvpermi.q.
The behavior of non-zero unused bits in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114344
Bug ID: 114344
Summary: [arm/mips] __alignof__ report a member packed struct
as 1, while normal load/store instruction is used
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106757
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] |[12/13 Regression]
/workspace/tcwg_gnu_3/abe/builds/destdir/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
version 14.0.1 20240314 (experimental) [master revision
gcc-14-9484-gefab8c1] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target tcwg-local
=== gfortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113430
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
I don't plan on pursuing it myself, leaving it to someone else, as I can't
reproduce on my main workstation and I don't want to faff w/ kernel config.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113430
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57708
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57708=edit
0001-libsanitizer-fix-ASAN-with-aggressive-CONFIG_ARCH_MM.patch
Untested patch for 13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106842
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] |[12 Regression] misleading
Regressions on native/master at commit r14-9484 vs commit r14-9483 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
1462
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-intel64-native/bld/gcc/xgcc version
14.0.1 20240314 (experimental) [native/master r14-9484-gefab8c1] (GCC)
=== g++ tests ===
Running target sde
FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106931
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] |[12 Regression]
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Mar 14 22:40:05 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9484-gefab8c1)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c pr97027 (test for warnings, line 72)
XPASS: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c pr97027
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107138
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 regression] |[12 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89323
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
This might work but I can't test it with x32:
```
diff --git a/libsanitizer/configure.tgt b/libsanitizer/configure.tgt
index 77a0e68222b..eb99edefbd3 100644
--- a/libsanitizer/configure.tgt
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113430
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Trivial program segfaults |[12/13 only] Trivial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113430
Dimitrij Mijoski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmjpp at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114343
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
Assignee|dmalcolm at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114343
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
No there is a missing `}` in the line that was done for
testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/null-deref-pr108251-smp_fetch_ssl_fc_has_early-O2.c :
/* { dg-bogus "may result in an unaligned pointer value" "Fixed in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114343
Bug ID: 114343
Summary: [13 regression] many erratic errors starting with
r13-8433-g1277f69b9b0206
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89323
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86
Status|WAITING
The relocation formats REL and RELA for ELF are inefficient. In a
release build of Clang for x86-64, .rela.* sections consume a
significant portion (approximately 20.9%) of the file size.
I propose RELLEB, a new format offering significant file size
reductions: 17.2% (x86-64), 16.5% (aarch64),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113934
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59863
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99091
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95943
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes179063
# of unexpected failures132
# of unexpected successes 19
# of expected failures 1614
# of unsupported tests 4186
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240314
(ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111555
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to YunQiang Su from comment #2)
> > For AArch64, clang supports `-mno-unaligned-access`, while gcc doesn't,
> > should we add it as an alias of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111555
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to YunQiang Su from comment #2)
> For AArch64, clang supports `-mno-unaligned-access`, while gcc doesn't,
> should we add it as an alias of -mstrict-align?
-mno-unaligned-access is the arm option
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your
patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please
follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's
#linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111555
YunQiang Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||syq at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114342
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
0/vector/vec-scalar-cmp-1.c scan-assembler
ne:\\n[^:]*\\twfcdb\\t%v[0-9]*,%v[0-9]*\\n\\t[^:]+\\tlocghine\\t%r2,1
XPASS: gcc.target/s390/vxe/popcount-1.c scan-assembler vpopctb\\t%v24,%v24
XPASS: gcc.target/s390/vxe/popcount-1.c scan-assembler vpopcth\\t%v24,%v24
===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114342
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The first memcpy (rep movsq) is for:
```
int arr[]{-5, 10, 15, -5, 10, 15, -5, 10, 15, -5, 10, 15, -5, 10, 15, -5, 10,
15, -5, 10, 15,-5, 10, 15 -5, 10, 15, -5, 10, 15, -5, 10, 15, -5, 10, 15, -5,
10, 15,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114342
Bug ID: 114342
Summary: suboptimal codegen of vector::vector(range)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114341
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-03-14
Summary ===
# of expected passes179063
# of unexpected failures116
# of unexpected successes 19
# of expected failures 1614
# of unsupported tests 4188
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240314
(experimental) [remote
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114341
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
x/(y&-y) is already recorded as PR 97738 .
(test for excess
errors)
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes178055
# of unexpected failures148
# of unexpected successes 12
# of expected failures 1597
# of unsupported tests 4965
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114341
Bug ID: 114341
Summary: Optimization opportunity with {mul,div} "(x & -x)" and
{<<,>>} "ctz(x)"
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
1 - 100 of 407 matches
Mail list logo
