Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp

2011-10-17 Thread Bob Breuer
Richard Henderson wrote: On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote: I don't think this is a free/g_free issue. If I use the following patch, then I at least get the openbios messages: diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c index a9fa608..dfbd6ea 100644 --- a/cpu-exec.c +++ b/cpu-exec.c

Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp

2011-10-17 Thread Bob Breuer
Kai Tietz wrote: 2011/10/17 Bob Breuer breu...@mc.net: Richard Henderson wrote: On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote: I don't think this is a free/g_free issue. If I use the following patch, then I at least get the openbios messages: diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c index a9fa608

Re: gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp

2011-10-19 Thread Bob Breuer
Kai Tietz wrote: 2011/10/18 Bob Breuer breu...@mc.net: Kai Tietz wrote: 2011/10/17 Bob Breuer breu...@mc.net: Richard Henderson wrote: On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote: Google finds a mention of longjmp failing with -fomit-frame-pointer: http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2005-02

Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp

2011-10-24 Thread Bob Breuer
Kai Tietz wrote: Hi, For trunk-version I have a tentative patch for this issue. On 4.6.x and older branches this doesn't work, as here we can't differenciate that easy between ms- and sysv-abi. But could somebody give this patch a try? Regards, Kai ChangeLog *

Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp

2011-10-25 Thread Bob Breuer
Kai Tietz wrote: 2011/10/24 Bob Breuer breu...@mc.net: Kai Tietz wrote: Hi, For trunk-version I have a tentative patch for this issue. On 4.6.x and older branches this doesn't work, as here we can't differenciate that easy between ms- and sysv-abi. But could somebody give this patch