On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Perry Smith pedz...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to get the -debug flag from the g++ command line to collect2?
-Wl,-debug
Ian
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Perry Smith pedz...@gmail.com wrote:
collect2 is dying when it calls ld for the first time because __dso_handle is
not defined. It is being reference from the calls to __cxa_atexit.
So, create another stub, and pass it into the first link.
Ian
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
In a very brief summary, I achieved a few things this summer: Ported patches
from last year - some made it to mainline, extended old patches and
resubmitted them, wrote new but mostly small clean-ups/speed-ups.k
Thanks
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Oleg Pekar (olpekar)
olpe...@cisco.com wrote:
I'm using gcc 4.1.2, it supports -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE option for c files but not
for c++. I'm looking for gcc version number where support for this option in
c++ files was added.
I'm not sure how to answer your
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Oleg Pekar (olpekar) olpe...@cisco.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Oleg Pekar (olpekar) olpe...@cisco.com
wrote:
I'm using gcc 4.1.2, it supports -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE option for c files but
not for c++. I'm looking for gcc version number where support
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de wrote:
I'm currently playing around with an RTL pass and started using C++.
When including algorithm I get the following:
/usr/include/c++/4.6/cstdlib:76:8: error: attempt to use poisoned
calloc
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
The official link at http://codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/ (note trailing
slash) still works.
It used to be http://sourcery.mentor.com/public/cxx-abi/ as of lately,
and now
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
Sorry for such a stupid question, but assuming that the GCC trunk (e.g. svn
rev 190745)
did already switch (during my holidays, so I did not follow that) to C++
per
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Or do we have a rule than any file using C++ specific feature should
be renamed from *.c to *.cc at the moment the C++ feature goes inside?
We do not have such a rule and I would
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Does this seem like something we could usefully add to GCC? Does
anybody see any big problems with it?
Does it work without unwind tables? I suspect it doesn't as it's using
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Janne Blomqvist
blomqvist.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
I've spent the last couple of days working on a stack backtrace library.
It uses the GCC unwind interface to collect a stack trace
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Paweł Sikora pl...@agmk.net wrote:
On Wednesday 29 of August 2012 00:22:55 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
I've spent the last couple of days working on a stack backtrace library.
It uses the GCC unwind interface to collect a stack trace, and parses
DWARF debug info
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:31 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
I believe the unwinder proper is async signal safe--it just uses
_Unwind_Backtrace.
The DWARF reader calls malloc and is therefore not async-signal
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Paweł Sikora pl...@agmk.net wrote:
On Wednesday 29 of August 2012 11:37:07 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Paweł Sikora pl...@agmk.net wrote:
On Wednesday 29 of August 2012 00:22:55 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
I've spent the last couple
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
What is the simplest way, for a plugin (and also for a GCC branch),
to detect if the compiler is straight or not (i.e. cross, that is
target host are different, or even canadian-cross).
I was thinking of
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/29/2012 09:22 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
It uses the GCC unwind interface to collect a stack trace, and parses
DWARF debug info to get file/line/function information. (Of course it's
silly to write yet another
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
Where in the manual are the machine specific print operand modifiers
documented? I've looked around, and just can seem to find them; surely, I
can't be the first to document such a modifier.
To the best of my knowledge
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
The contrib/config-list.mk tool appears to be suffering from bitrot.
The make failures for a limited subset of configurations consisted
exclusively of:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Thu Aug 30 16:18:47 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
Diego already loves it!
Indeed I do!
I'm making changes in VEC that will benefit from this. I am currently
keeping the VEC_* macros so that I can pass
Hi Dehao, I suspect that your recent patch changing block handling has
broken bootstrap with --enable-languages=go. I reduced the test case
to this C++ code:
#include string
std::string
f(bool is_string, bool is_constant)
{
if (is_string)
{
std::string left_string;
std::string
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Dehao Chen de...@google.com wrote:
The bug is in tree-eh.c. IS_UNKNOWN_LOCATION is mistakenly used, thus
the block info for a call stmt is cleared.
A patch to fix the problem is atached:
gcc/ChangeLog:
tree-eh.c (lower_try_finally_dup_block): Use
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Dehao Chen de...@google.com wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
tree-eh.c (lower_try_finally_dup_block): Use correct way to
check unknown location.
While you think about my questions, let's fix the bootstrap. This
patch is OK if it passes bootstrap and a gcc and
I propose that Cary Coutant ccout...@google.com become an additional
DWARF maintainer, along with Jason. Cary has been on the DWARF
working group for many years and is very familiar with the format. He
has written several patches for GCC's DWARF code. He's been an
extensive contributor to the
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
m68k.md contains the following insn:
(define_insn
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 nonimmediate_operand =d)
(zero_extract:SI (match_operand:SI 1 register_operand do)
(match_operand:SI 2
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Frederic Riss frederic.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to the help of segher and iant on IRC (thanks again!), I
narrowed my problem down to something I can fully understand and
explain (well I hope).
There is a bad interaction between the IRA handling of subregs
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu wrote:
Is libbacktrace currently functional in gcc trunk and is it expected
to function on darwin? While I could understand it not working on installed
binaries of FSF gcc that were stripped, I would think it should work
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com wrote:
This question is mainly for some future submission. Am I allowed to
use fatal_error (..)? Mainly, I want to use it in cases where I want to say
if this error has occurred, I see no reason to go forward with
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
So I take it that libbacktrace doesn't work with the separate DWARF
debuginfo as shipped by all Linux distributions either?
That does not work at present. I doubt it's difficult.
Ian
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:08 AM, _ neura...@gmail.com wrote:
I thing it would be best to implement it as compiller switch -fsmart-pointers
not requiring scope object and derive statement for objects. ie we
need equal flexibility and freedom like have today with static objects
Experience shows
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Simon Baldwin sim...@google.com wrote:
I've looked at fortran/module.c and at libgomp/omp_lib.mod, and this
is not a bug.
This isn't particularly helpful, but, based on the rest of your
description, this is a bug. The compiler should never depend on the
order
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I'm working with the BeagleBone and gcc-4.5.4 on Gentoo. If I
try to compile the 3.6 kernel with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL, I get:
arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S:127: Error: selected processor does
not support requested
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I'm working with the BeagleBone and gcc-4.5.4 on Gentoo. If I
try to compile the 3.6 kernel with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL, I get:
arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S:127: Error: selected processor does
not support requested
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe Ian can mention why he used alloca there instead of xmalloc.
It was a long time ago, but I expect it was just because alloca is
usually fine for memory that has to live for just a single function.
As a single-threaded
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote:
That PR now has a link to a mocked up bugzilla page:
http://www.kayari.plus.com/gcc/enter_bug.cgi-1.html which I think
would be a significant improvement, without getting in the way or
being an eyesore.
Do any
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Paulo Matos pma...@broadcom.com wrote:
I have found a strange inconsistency between code and docs for
TARGET_ASM_NAMED_SECTION.
Docs say
(http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.1/gccint/File-Framework.html#index-TARGET_005fASM_005fNAMED_005fSECTION-4472):
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Caroline Tice cmt...@google.com wrote:
I am working on a patch (which I hope to be able to submit in the next
few days), and I have run into a snag that I am hoping someone can
help me with.
As part of this patch, I am trying to build two new *.a (static
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Caroline Tice cmt...@google.com wrote:
Ok, here are the patches for the Makefile.am and Makefile.in files. I
am also having trouble with the following issue: I need to make sure
that one of the new libraries is linked in with libstdc++ when
libstdc++ gets
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Caroline Tice cmt...@google.com wrote:
Ian Tayler (in private communication) asked that I get the part of the
build log that shows the .so and .a files being built and send it to
the list. Here it is.
I see the problem. libstdc++/libsupc++/Makefile.am
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Perry Smith pedz...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure they could be rewritten in C. GNUs libc choose to do them in C++
probably because C++ just gives a nicer way to do things.
In the GNU libc __cxa_atexit and __cxa_finalize are written in C, not C++.
We should not
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Caroline Tice cmt...@google.com wrote:
Actually, I did have to edit the Makefile.in slightly. When I
generate it with automake, it automatically adds the lines:
libvtv_init_la_LIBADD =
libvtv_init_la_SOURCES = libvtv_init.c
libvtv_init_la_OBJECTS =
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 3:56 AM, nat...@t-online.de nat...@t-online.de wrote:
I find this array bound check too hard:
Please file a bug report.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/
Thanks.
Ian
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mischa Baars mjbaars1...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been writing this piece of example code, but it seems that someone
has been modifying the compiler in the meantime such that arguments are now
passed in xmm registers instead of over the stack. Also the npx top of
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Mischa Baars mjbaars1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:11 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mischa Baars mjbaars1...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have been writing this piece of example code, but it seems that someone
has been modifying
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Mischa Baars mjbaars1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/04/2012 02:45 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
There is no original. The 32-bit and 64-bit ABIs are different.
The 64-bit ABI has always passed arguments in registers. There is no
option to force the 64-bit compiler
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Currently, using -ffunction-sections and -p together results in a
warning. I ran into this problem when compiling the kernel. This is
discussed in this thread:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2008-11/msg00128.html
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Kenneth Zadeck
zad...@naturalbridge.com wrote:
The question is why is having a case label of 256 on a unsigned char switch
legal?
Are you asking why it is valid in the C language? Or are you asking
why it is valid in GIMPLE? I guess the first question is
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 04:34:15 +, Dave Korn wrote:
Say, why don't we reserve GCC 5.0 for the first version that gets rid of
reload? Then let's see if we can get there while the X in 4.X is still in
single
Currently -fPIC -fPIE seems to be the same as -fPIE. Unfortunately,
-fPIE -fPIC also seems to be the same as -fPIE. It seems to me that,
as is usual with conflicting options, we should use the one that
appears last on the command line.
Do we have an existing mechanism in options processing for
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 7:00 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
Currently -fPIC -fPIE seems to be the same as -fPIE. Unfortunately,
-fPIE -fPIC also seems to be the same as -fPIE. It seems to me that,
as is usual
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 13/11/12 14:56, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Currently -fPIC -fPIE seems to be the same as -fPIE. Unfortunately,
-fPIE -fPIC also seems to be the same as -fPIE. It seems to me that,
as is usual with conflicting options
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Currently, using -ffunction-sections and -p together results
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/14/2012 01:00 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Given that nobody has stepped forward to test it, let's just remove
the code and see if anybody complains. I'll approve the patch unless
somebody objects in the next 24 hours
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
My strong belief is that a compiler project as gigantic as GCC needs some kind
of garbage collection.
I suspect that is correct, especially given the way the compiler is
currently implemented. But I also
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis
g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
And, as a side note, highly formatted output generally is not
much better than printf. For any text that needs to be localized,
I
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org wrote:
Il 14/11/2012 15:27, Ian Lance Taylor ha scritto:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 13/11/12 14:56, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Currently -fPIC -fPIE seems to be the same as -fPIE
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
Ian and I have started thinking about the next Cauldron. This
time, we are thinking of organizing it in Mountain View, at
Google's headquarters.
In case it's not obvious, this is Mountain View, California, USA.
-
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
The main advantage is that you can compile a program with CFLAGS=-O2 -g
-fPIE, and libtool's adding of -fPIC for shared libraries will work
reliably
Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com writes:
Sure. First I wanted to find out whether this requirement is just a
technical limitation with our mailing list software.
It is not a technical limitation. We explicitly reject HTML e-mail. We
could accept it.
As Jonathan pointed out, accepting HTML
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:00 AM, ETANI NORIKO
norik...@fc.ritsumei.ac.jp wrote:
We have been developing many-core system in a program of“Extremely Low-power
Circuits and Systems (Green IT Project)”sponsored by New Energy and
Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) which is one
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Dmitry Mikushin dmi...@kernelgen.org wrote:
We are trying to embed a raw vector of chars into .s file using the
following code:
tree index_type = build_index_type(size_int(moduleBitcode.size()));
tree const_char_type = build_qualified_type(
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Matt Davis mattdav...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a GIMPLE pass and would like to make use of the data type
information that the Go frontend produces. Is there a way to access
this information from the middle end without having to query the
frontend?
What kind
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Matt Davis mattdav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Matt Davis mattdav...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a GIMPLE pass and would like to make use of the data type
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Arthur Schwarz aschwarz1...@att.net wrote:
I have run some tests to determine the gcc 4.5.3 integer promotion policies.
This message is not appropriate for the mailing list gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
which is for the development of GCC itself. It would be appropriate
on
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Richard Günther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Oy vey, he's changed his name again.
Ian
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu wrote:
The main issue is that the test in configure is brain-dead and demands an
explicit version.
Any reason not to fix that?
Ian
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Dmitry Mikushin dmi...@kernelgen.org wrote:
We have a version of GCC coming as additional toolchain for several
supported Linux distros. Moreover, package we are shipping also contains
modified glibc and some other libraries. In this situation, applications
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Prasad Joshi prasadjoshi...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently joined this mailing list and I was particularly interested
in knowing how the atomic built-ins
(http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.1/gcc/Atomic-Builtins.html) are
implemented in gcc.
I skimmed
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Cary Coutant ccout...@google.com wrote:
Next, I compiled a 5000-line C++ source file at both -O0 and -O2.
I have to assume that David is working with C code, as stabs debugging
for C++ is nearly unusable.
Ian
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Mischa Baars mjbaars1...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me explain again for you. Every 'if' statement in C is translated into a
'fucom' or similar instruction, which sets a number of conditions flags in
the co-processor. Some instructions need you to load these into the
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
I read code in lower-subreg.c and found GCC only split some of
multi-word mode instructions, like load from memory into pseudo reg,
etc. The related code is in find_decomposable_subregs.
So for below example from
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Matt Davis mattdav...@gmail.com wrote:
This question is similar to my last; however, I think it provides a
bit more clarity as to how I am obtaining offsets from the frame
pointer. I have an RTL pass that is processed after expand passes. I
keep track of a
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Igor Kovacevic
igor.kovacev...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a master student and I'm writing my thesis on bug triaging in open
source project and I wondering if I can access to a big part of the
bug repository,
if I can, how to do it ?
Writing a crawler/parser for
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Frédéric Buclin lpso...@netscape.net wrote:
(Igor jumped into the Bugzilla developers IRC channel, so that's why I
heard about this thread.)
Ian said:
I'm willing to provide you with a dump of gcc's bugzilla database if
you can give me the exact command to
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Chassin chas...@ceis.cujae.edu.cu wrote:
is there any function allows loading Gimple output from file and create the
internal Gimple structure ?
Not to my knowledge, but see http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GimpleFrontEnd .
Ian
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Umesh Kalappa umesh.kalap...@gmail.com wrote:
First ,As per the gcc Gimple to RTL conversion ,the RTL insns set
should be same for the both target ...am i rite here ???...or do i
miss something here ???
Although you didn't say that the targets are, you said
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Matt Davis mattdav...@gmail.com wrote:
decl = create_tmp_var(type, testarray);
DECL_INITIAL(decl) = build_constructor(type, entries);
return decl;
Do you ever create a DECL_EXPR statement for this local variable?
Ian
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Jeffrey Walton noloa...@gmail.com wrote:
What does C/C++ and GCC offer to ensure writes are complete before
reads are performed on a value in a multi-threaded program?
The write must be done using
__atomic_store(pointer, value, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
The read
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 11:47 AM, David Brown david.br...@hesbynett.no wrote:
Anyway, the simplest memory barrier in gcc is :
asm volatile( ::: memory);
That is a compilation level memory barrier, but it clearly does
nothing at the machine level.
To get a machine level (and
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Frediano Ziglio
frediano.zig...@citrix.com wrote:
I imported some headers from Linux kernel which mainly came from
gcov-io.h and the structures used internally by GCC.
Our problem is currently about the license. In gcov-io.h is stated that
license is mainly
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com wrote:
On 04.02.13 at 17:46, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Frediano Ziglio
frediano.zig...@citrix.com wrote:
I imported some headers from Linux kernel which mainly came from
gcov-io.h
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org wrote:
Would it make sense to release the header file under a permissive
license or even public domain?
The information there is just ABI, it's dubious that it is copyrightable
at all. If two colleagues of Frediano's did a
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Jeff Law suzanne.jeff@gmail.com wrote:
Consider this code in va_gc::reserve:
templatetypename T, typename A
void
va_gc::reserve (vecT, A, vl_embed *v, unsigned reserve, bool exact
MEM_STAT_DECL)
{
unsigned alloc
=
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Alec Teal a.t...@warwick.ac.uk wrote:
On 13/02/13 12:39, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Alec Teal a.t...@warwick.ac.uk wrote:
It's just a filename ... we compile
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Johannes Pfau johannesp...@gmail.com wrote:
We recently got a bug report for the GCC D compiler frontend which shows that
we
currently don't inline any templated functions. The reason seems to be that
decl_replaceable_p always returns true for D template
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Johannes Pfau johannesp...@gmail.com wrote:
Ian Lance Taylor iant at google.com writes:
Why is that? decl_replaceable_p is supposed to be true for a function
that may be replaced by an entirely different function at runtime.
This is mainly to implement
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Jeffrey Walton noloa...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been using John Regehr's Integer Overflow Checker (IOC) on a few
libraries. It is a Clang plug-in and can be found at
http://embed.cs.utah.edu/ioc/.
The checker has flagged two libraries I use for performing
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Alan Lehotsky alehot...@me.com wrote:
I'm looking at a machine with limited stack, and no push instructions or
displaced-addressing mode. The call instruction stores the return address in
the link register.
For non-recursive functions we save the return
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Johannes Pfau johannesp...@gmail.com wrote:
the gdc D compiler currently doesn't implement non-POD types. As in C++
those
types can have copy constructors or destructors and should be kept in memory.
Right now I just set TREE_ADDRESSABLE on the RECORD_TYPE
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Joseph F Shobe jfsh...@wichita.edu wrote:
I've been doing some research and using your SVN repository. I have limited
myself to just performing 'svn log' and 'svn ls' requests.
However, as of late, I am no longer able to to perform this function from a
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:49 AM, YU Chenkan cy...@ust.hk wrote:
I'm a newbie and I'm trying to modify the front end to extend C.
I know the following code can be accepted,
void f (struct S { int a; } s, int a[][s.a]) { } .
I'm wondering whether it is possible to build a structure
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:46 AM, N.M. Maclaren n...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
On Mar 6 2013, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Except GCC implements C's unions as allowing to do type punning as an
extension and as far as GCC is concerned that is not going to change
any time soon.
This is a documented exception
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Matt Godbolt m...@godbolt.org wrote:
I'm having trouble building the RC 4.8.0 with an in-tree binutils on
an Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64. It seems that while building GCC, the runtime
library path does not include the objdir/prev-*/.libs directories; so
whenever any
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Matt Godbolt m...@godbolt.org wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply. I definitely have --enable-shared set in
the configuration, and had so with 4.7. However I'm not certain that
previously a system-installed libbfd.so et al were causing my build to
succeed (for
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Fabrizio Gennari
fabrizio...@tiscali.it wrote:
Il 24/03/2013 18:48, Fabrizio Gennari ha scritto:
Il 23/03/2013 18:07, DJ Delorie ha scritto:
The DJGPP build of gcc 4.8.0 was just uploaded, it might have some
patches that haven't been committed upstream yet.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Fotis Koutoulakis
fotis.koutoula...@gmail.com wrote:
I am writing this email with regard to a potential project idea that's
hosted on the GCC wiki about porting the go programming language GCC
(gccgo) frontend to the GNU/HURD operating system (information found
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Fabrizio Gennari
fabrizio...@tiscali.it wrote:
Il 25/03/2013 00:00, Ian Lance Taylor ha scritto:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Fabrizio Gennari
fabrizio...@tiscali.it wrote:
Il 24/03/2013 18:48, Fabrizio Gennari ha scritto:
Il 23/03/2013 18:07, DJ
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Nenad Vukicevic ne...@intrepid.com wrote:
The latest Fedora Core 18 comes with automake 1.12.1 and perl 5.16.2. I
installed and tried to use automake 1.11.1 for one of the GCC libraries, but
got a warning from aclocal:
main::scan_file() called too early to
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Thu Mar 28 08:53:03 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
Eh - in fact you _promised_ to do that in trade for accepting the C++
conversion!
Never trust promises from google ... *sigh*
You need to calm down. This childish
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Matt Burgess
matt...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
1) We currently assume that binutils is 'upstream' for libiberty
development, and should therefore 'own' the libiberty.a file. Is that
assumption correct?
No. The master sources for libiberty are in the GCC
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Alec Teal a.t...@warwick.ac.uk wrote:
I'm still planning to rewrite the c++ parser in GCC, right now I am still
researching, I remember a page that talked about the problems of parsing in
nested templates, and I cannot find the link!
Searching for it has
1 - 100 of 6760 matches
Mail list logo
