[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102456] ICE in gfc_check_rank, at fortran/check.c:4594

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102456 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102371] Error for type spec in FORALL statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102371 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/102331] ICE in attr_decl1, at fortran/decl.c:8691

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102331 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC

[Bug fortran/102145] TKR mismatches with -pedantic: -fallow-argument-mismatch does not degrade errors to warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102145 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Rimvydas (RJ) from comment #4) > (In reply to ripero84 from comment #0) > > In the presence of -pedantic, -fallow-argument-mismatch fails to degrade the > >

[Bug fortran/98490] Unexpected out of bounds in array constructor with implied do loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490 --- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #9) > (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #7) > > This regresses okay. > > Still does. Shall I submit it for review, commit for you, or let it b

[Bug fortran/92805] gfortran: blanks within literal constants should not be allowed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92805 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102145] TKR mismatches with -pedantic: -fallow-argument-mismatch does not degrade errors to warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102145 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug fortran/101918] LTO type mismatches for runtime library functions in mixed -fdefault-real-8 projects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101918 --- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Rimvydas (RJ) from comment #7) At least some common examples of what to look for in > documentation about "gfortran -fdefault-real-8 -fdefault-double-8"

[Bug fortran/101918] LTO type mismatches for runtime library functions in mixed -fdefault-real-8 projects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101918 --- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Rimvydas (RJ) from comment #8) > If we can agree that use of -fdefault-real-8 -fdefault-double-8 with -flto > does not magically recompile intrinsic subroutines in r

[Bug fortran/102113] parsing error in assigned goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102113 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libfortran/102111] Segfault with associate to derived type with allocatable component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102111 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102011] Infinite loop in heron iteration when optimization is enabled with gfortran 10.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102011 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/101967] Implement F2018:C949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101967 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/101967] New: Implement F2018:C949

: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The source-expr in an ALLOCATE statement cannot have a type with an coarray ultimate component. This patch catches the issue. diff --git a/gcc/fortran/match.c b/gcc/fortran/match.c index

[Bug fortran/101951] Implement F2018:C937

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101951 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/101951] New: Implement F2018:C937

: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- A small program was posted by Vipul Parekh in the J3 mailing list asking about its conformance. https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2021-August/013230.html The program exposes a bug where

[Bug fortran/101918] LTO type mismatches for runtime library functions in mixed -fdefault-real-8 projects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101918 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/101871] Array of strings of different length passed as an argument produces invalid result.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101871 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- With this testcase, program tao_program implicit none integer i character(80) abc(9) character(1) n n = 'H' abc = [character(80) :: & & 'a'//n, 'ab', 'abc', '

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 --- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #12) > Andreas, is this something you may be able to have a look at? > (It's about the architectures you used to "play" with on FreeBSD.)

[Bug fortran/101871] Array of strings of different length passed as an argument produces invalid result.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101871 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > PR85547 is likely related to this one. Yes, indeed. Looks like a duplicate. I checked that array.c(gfc_match_array_constructor) does the right things.

[Bug fortran/101871] Array of strings of different length passed as an argument produces invalid result.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101871 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC

[Bug fortran/101350] ICE in build_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2376

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101350 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #1) > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c > index 45c3ad387ac..897cfde3ed3 100644 > --- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c > +++ b/gcc/fortr

[Bug fortran/101735] Type parameter inquiries for substrings are rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101735 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/99368] ICE in build_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2381

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99368 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/101627] List-directed read with trailing characters after quotes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101627 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/101627] List-directed read with trailing characters after quotes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101627 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/101632] NON_RECURSIVE procedure prefix is unsupported. F2018 defaults to recursive procedures.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101632 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 51207 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51207=edit Diff that implements F2018 NON_RECURSIVE and makes things recursive by default.

[Bug fortran/101632] NON_RECURSIVE procedure prefix is unsupported. F2018 defaults to recursive procedures.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101632 --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- F2018 introduced the NON_RECURSIVE prefix for procedures and also made procedures recursive by default. This code is conforming to F2018. module bah contains ! ! non_recursive

[Bug fortran/101632] New: NON_RECURSIVE procedure prefix is unsupported. F2018 defaults to recursive procedures.

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: ---

[Bug fortran/83094] ICE in ipa_modify_formal_parameters, at ipa-param-manipulation.c:105

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83094 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/78219] [F08] specifying the kind of a FORALL index in the header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78219 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #7) > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/match.c b/gcc/fortran/match.c > index d148de3e3b5..d7668f6a928 100644 > --- a/gcc/fortran/match.c > +++ b/gcc/for

[Bug fortran/83953] Internal compiler error with -fcheck=bounds option on derived type components and forall construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83953 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- The original test case also appears to now work.

[Bug fortran/83953] Internal compiler error with -fcheck=bounds option on derived type components and forall construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83953 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/101564] ICE in resolve_allocate_deallocate, at fortran/resolve.c:8169

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101564 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > The %kind was introduced probably in r9, so likely not a real regression. > > I am testing the following patch: > > diff --git a/gcc/fort

[Bug fortran/101564] ICE in resolve_allocate_deallocate, at fortran/resolve.c:8169

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101564 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/101565] ICE in gfc_simplify_image_index, at fortran/simplify.c:8234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101565 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/78219] [F08] specifying the kind of a FORALL index in the header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78219 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/82943] [F03] Error with type-bound procedure of parametrized derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/101399] Horizonal tab character not ignored on print statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101399 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/101350] ICE in build_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2376

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101350 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC

[Bug fortran/101349] ICE in gfc_get_descriptor_field, at fortran/trans-array.c:140

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101349 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/101327] ICE in find_array_element, at fortran/expr.c:1355

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101327 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/101329] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101329 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-07-05

[Bug fortran/101330] ICE in free_expr0(): Bad expr type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101330 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status

[Bug fortran/92621] Problems with memory handling with allocatable intent(out) arrays with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/101255] FLUSH statement - error should be negative

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101255 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/100950] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/100954] writing to a character opens unit -10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100954 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/86694] gfortran rejects character parameter binding label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86694 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/86694] gfortran rejects character parameter binding label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86694 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ehlert at thch dot uni-bonn.de

[Bug fortran/100870] Constant expression for bind(C) name in interface body not importable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100870 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug fortran/100855] pow run time gfortran vs ifort

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100855 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC

[Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/100440] allocated() gives True for unallocated variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100440 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- David, On amd64-*-freebsd, I see % gfcx -o z -O2 -fcheck=all allocate_error.f95 % ./z Sample 10. Eigenvalue from matrix powers. Iterationeigenvalue approximation 0

[Bug fortran/100440] allocated() gives True for unallocated variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100440 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/86206] ICE in gfc_resolve_forall, at fortran/resolve.c:9989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86206 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/100235] 10.3.0 Performance regressions for compile-time math intrinsics computation on arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100235 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/100149] Seg fault passing to CHARACTER(*), DIMENSION(*), INTENT(IN), OPTIONAL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100149 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96013] ICE in write_symbol, at fortran/module.c:5747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96013 --- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #13) > The following variant gives an ICE > >type t >end type > contains >function f() result(t) > charac

[Bug fortran/69360] loop optimization produces invalid code when a common array has dimension 1 in some files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69360 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/100094] Undefined pointers have incorrect rank when using optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100094 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/63797] Bogus ambiguous reference to 'sqrt'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63797 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC

[Bug fortran/99922] Bind(C) with assumed length character should work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99922 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-06 Status

[Bug libfortran/98301] random_init() is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98301 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #49770|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug fortran/99853] ICE: Cannot convert 'LOGICAL(4)' to 'INTEGER(8)' (etc.)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99853 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/99840] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_matmul, at fortran/simplify.c:4777

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99840 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96013] ICE in write_symbol, at fortran/module.c:5747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96013 --- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) > > > Sometime the test ICE with > > > > > > f951: internal compiler error: gfc_code2string(): Bad code > &g

[Bug fortran/96013] ICE in write_symbol, at fortran/module.c:5747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96013 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/99740] floating point exception in rand() in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99740 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC

[Bug fortran/99711] Crash when reading an allocated character array in namelist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99711 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/99609] Pure Function that has a Variable with Value Attribute that is modified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99609 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/99561] gfortran reports an error for a truncation that is permitted by the standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99561 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #1) > (In reply to Michal Paszta from comment #0) > > In this line of code: > > > > INTEGER(KIND=1) :: var8 = 257_2 > > > > we try

[Bug fortran/99561] gfortran reports an error for a truncation that is permitted by the standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99561 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status

[Bug fortran/99506] internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99506 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 --- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #8) > > Short of someone diving in, there is always the kludge of ... > This is a better kludge, but is far from the correct approach as gfortran s

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/99351] ICE in gfc_finish_var_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:695

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99351 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-03 Ever confirmed

[Bug fortran/99349] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99349 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/99256] ICE in variable_check, at fortran/check.c:1012

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99256 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/99139] ICE: gfc_get_default_type(): Bad symbol '__tmp_UNKNOWN_0_rank_1'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99139 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/99060] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_varspec, at fortran/primary.c:2411

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99060 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-02-10 Ever confirmed

[Bug fortran/99061] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_intrinsic_atan2d, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:4728

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99061 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/99036] [11 Regression] ICE in gfc_current_interface_head, at fortran/interface.c:4699

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99036 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/95647] operator(.eq.) and operator(==) treated differently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95647 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/98948] unexpected error in procedure pointer initialization or assignment with intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98948 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-02-03 Ever confirmed

[Bug fortran/98948] unexpected error in procedure pointer initialization or assignment with intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98948 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC

[Bug fortran/98883] Module variable not initialized with -finit-real

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98883 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P4 |P5 CC

[Bug fortran/98701] I compiled a program with gfortran on Mac (Big Sur, version 11.1) and g77 on Windows 10. I get two very different results for identical input files with the results from the one c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98701 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status

[Bug fortran/98701] I compiled a program with gfortran on Mac (Big Sur, version 11.1) and g77 on Windows 10. I get two very different results for identical input files with the results from the one c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98701 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/89204] -floop-interchange has no effect on Fortran code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89204 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/98577] Wrong "count_rate" values with int32 and real32 if the "count" argument is int64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98577 --- Comment #21 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Chinoune from comment #20) > won't fix. This is hilarious! Now, I know why you are so confused. >From your code in comment #2 call system_clock( t1, count_rate_r32 ) c =

[Bug fortran/98577] Wrong "count_rate" values with int32 and real32 if the "count" argument is int64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98577 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID --- Comment #16 from

[Bug fortran/98577] Wrong "count_rate" values with int32 and real32 if the "count" argument is int64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98577 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID --- Comment #14 from

[Bug fortran/98577] Wrong "count_rate" values with int32 and real32 if the "count" argument is int64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98577 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID --- Comment #11 from

[Bug fortran/98577] Wrong "count_rate" values with int32 and real32 if the "count" argument is int64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98577 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID --- Comment #9 from

[Bug fortran/98577] Wrong "count_rate" values with int32 and real32 if the "count" argument is int64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98577 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/98558] Scalar character parameter does not print warning if actual length >1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98558 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >