Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/tree-ssa-loop-im.o
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
t.c:
typedef int int32_t;
typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
typedef unsigned int uint32_t;
struct _IO_marker
{
};
static const int32_t mfcone = 1;
static const uint8_t *mfctop = (const uint8_t *) mfcone;
int32_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57067
Bug #: 57067
Summary: Missing control flow edges for setjmp/longjmp
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57067
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-25
14:46:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I suppose more selectively removing edges would be best. Eventually this is
done to cater for expansions of builtin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56978
Bug #: 56978
Summary: memset-chk.c failure since r197671
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56978
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56921
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56033
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56033
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-08
11:24:22 UTC ---
Just noticed the example in libffi documentation which suggests that casting to
the return type pointer should work:
/* Acts like puts
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56689
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56689
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29707|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56689
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-25
09:14:52 UTC ---
phicprop2:
bb 9:
switch (fixed_11(D)) default: L15, case 0: L6, case 1: L12
vrp2:
bb 9:
switch (fixed_13(D)) default: L15, case 1: L12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56689
Bug #: 56689
Summary: internal compiler error: in get_loop_body, at
cfgloop.c:841
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56689
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-22
14:56:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 29707
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29707
Reduced testcase
cc1plus -fpreprocessed -quiet -O2 t.cc
t.cc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54016
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54016
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55719
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-11
16:43:56 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Fri Jan 11 16:43:49 2013
New Revision: 195109
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195109
Log:
2013-01-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55719
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55718
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-10
08:15:23 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Jan 10 08:15:07 2013
New Revision: 195078
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195078
Log:
2013-01-10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55718
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55719
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55719
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-10
07:55:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 29137
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29137
Experimental fix
This patch fixes the problem for me. I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55754
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-20
15:20:17 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Dec 20 15:20:06 2012
New Revision: 194636
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194636
Log:
2012-12-20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55718
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55717
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
11:35:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Created attachment 28987 [details]
gcc48-pr55717.patch
Untested fix. Instead of returning very likely bogus value x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55719
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-05
11:54:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 28879
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28879
Reduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-05
11:58:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 28880
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28880
web output r192525
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-05
11:58:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 28881
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28881
web output r192526
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
--- Comment #15 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-05
12:55:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #10)
The attached testcase gets miscompiled starting with that revision.
And is not fixed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55511
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28
14:10:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
Is this with the first build of libgcc? I.e. is it likely that I'll
see this with just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55511
Bug #: 55511
Summary: r193802 caused s390x bootstrap failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54746
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-01
07:23:21 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Mon Oct 1 07:23:12 2012
New Revision: 191885
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191885
Log:
2012-10-01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54746
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-01
07:33:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
break;
case PROCESSOR_2097_Z10:
s390_cost = z10_cost;
case PROCESSOR_2817_Z196:
s390_cost
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54746
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-01
07:51:26 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Mon Oct 1 07:51:20 2012
New Revision: 191888
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191888
Log:
2012-10-01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54016
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-20
13:48:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Do I have to do something special now when creating a loop on RTL level?
Perhaps tell the framework that the loop infos needs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54016
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |krebbel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54016
Bug #: 54016
Summary: tree loop optimizer: no branch on count on s390
anymore since revision 185913
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-18
07:09:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
I don't see how r187965 could cause this, but I do see the problem.
mark_sym_for_renaming (called via the s390 va_arg_expr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
Bug #: 53681
Summary: s390 bootstrap failure since 187965
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
08:30:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This is an ice-on-invalid - how can that break bootstrap?
delta was a bit too eager. Same happens with:
int
__gcov_execle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53280
Bug #: 53280
Summary: s390 bootstrap failure since r186977
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53141
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-27
14:32:23 UTC ---
That's because reload now will try with swapped operands before going to the
next alternative. So now the first alternative will be used instead
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53141
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-27
14:47:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 27252
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27252
Patch proposal
This patch should bring back the old behavior.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52242
Bug #: 52242
Summary: [4.7 regression] libgomp.c/atomic-2.c failure on s390x
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52242
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390x-ibm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49800
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-02
08:58:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Does this still fail?
Still fails with r183790.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51856
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-20
16:29:11 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Fri Jan 20 16:29:01 2012
New Revision: 183341
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183341
Log:
2012-01-20 Andreas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51856
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-19
14:38:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 26379
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26379
Fix
I've introduced that bug with:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51860
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-16
08:23:56 UTC ---
Regarding the insn address the split is supposed to happen after the call_insn
3059.
But the code I've added to keep the call_arg_location note after
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-15
17:00:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
But ElectricFence should work even on s390 31-bit. Can you please try that?
I've linked libstdc++ against electric fence
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51860
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-15
20:37:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Reducing a -fcompare-debug failure on c-common.c with delta.
Thanks for working on this! I already had a quick look. The problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51860
Bug #: 51860
Summary: [4.7 regression] s390 esa mode bootstrap comparison
failure since transactional memory branch
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51860
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390-ibm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845
Bug #: 51845
Summary: [4.6 regression]
23_containers/unordered_multimap/erase/24061-multimap.
cc segfault
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-13
12:41:55 UTC ---
For s390 the first failing release was r181677.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-13
12:42:42 UTC ---
Yes Valgrind has S/390 support since release 3.7.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-13
13:07:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Andreas, can you run the test under valgrind? Thanks in advance.
I should better have mentioned that Valgrind on S/390 doesn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51734
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-04
11:41:11 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Wed Jan 4 11:41:06 2012
New Revision: 182868
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182868
Log:
config/
2012-01-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51734
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51734
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
08:45:59 UTC ---
That looks like another fallout from having -fpic in picflag.m4. So I'll remove
the s390*-*-* case in picflag.m4:
s390*-*-*)
$1=-fpic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51735
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
08:53:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Is the segfault in the
for (;;)
{
if ((*mem_chain)-elt == v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51735
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51735
Bug #: 51735
Summary: [4.7 regression] stage 3 bootstrap failure compiling
tree-ssa-pre.c with r182760
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51735
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390x-ibm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-14
12:02:47 UTC ---
libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/for-2.C: In function 'void f7(int, int, int)':^M
libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/for-2.C:87:3: error: invalid increment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50395
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-08
14:37:24 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Dec 8 14:37:19 2011
New Revision: 182116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182116
Log:
2011-12-08 Andreas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50395
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51144
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51144
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21
10:10:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
PR middle-end/51144
* output.h (fprint_w): Remove.
* final.c (fprint_w): Remove.
(output_addr_const): Change
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50074
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21
13:31:16 UTC ---
This fixes the testcase on s390x. Tested with r181554.
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17
15:23:26 UTC ---
As the tests from Ian Sandoe and Dominique d'Humieres show, the Darwin/AIX
regressions disappear when limiting the extract_bit_field invocation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-16
09:27:59 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Wed Nov 16 09:27:56 2011
New Revision: 181405
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181405
Log:
2011-11-16 Andreas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51144
Bug #: 51144
Summary: r181279
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51144
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390-ibm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50661
--- Comment #16 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-11
11:41:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Andreas, can I have your feedback about this? Is it safe or not to compare
s390
pointers with memcmp?
On s390 with 31 bit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50074
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-14
07:20:14 UTC ---
I've looked into the 22_locale/money_get/get/char/13.cc failure.
The problem is a miscompilation of locale-inst.cc in libstdc++.
Source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-14
08:41:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 25270
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25270
Experimental fix
On S/390 all the failures disappear with that patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50395
Bug #: 50395
Summary: Infinite loop when bootstrapping java
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Bug #: 50325
Summary: 76 new fails with rev. 177691
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48415
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-suse-linux|powerpc64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49800
Summary: segfault with -fsched-pressure -fdump-rtl-sched1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49080
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46399
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46399
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel
501 - 600 of 648 matches
Mail list logo
