https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114841
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 58029
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58029=edit
WIP patch against r8-7277-g515f874faf4562
In the 2
|1
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2024-04-24
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Meta-bug for issues with C++ template template parameters.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114460
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90390
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111067
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #11)
> SO I suppose the question is do we want to figure out why the opt is failing
> (knowing that if it succeeds that is a secondary issue) - or just
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111067
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
> > So I am actually asking if the extension actually has any useful meaning?
>
> For non-darwin, yes, it requests
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114562
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114561
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114455
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109753
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 57706
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57706=edit
one approach
I tried just making implicit functions respect #pragma target, but that
regresses pr105306 due to
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113706
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 57423
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57423=edit
patch for GCC 15
Here's a fix, but since this isn't a regression it can wait for stage 1.
|15.0
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
I think this is a front-end issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113612
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113612
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107291
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107291
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110084
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109359
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111286
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109359
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109359
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jason at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109359
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113767
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92407
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joerg.rich...@pdv-fs.de
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113767
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113767
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111948
Bug 111948 depends on bug 112439, which changed state.
Bug 112439 Summary: [13/14 Regression] Modification of a member overlapping
with a [[no_unique_address]] member in the constructor is incorrectly rejected
in constant evaluation since
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112439
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113638
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113360
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113638
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113531
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Reduced:
#include
void f(int) { }
void g()
{
for (auto i : { 1, 2, 3 })
f (i);
f(42);
}
int main()
{
g();
g();
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113531
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112846
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113451
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
|1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2024-01-30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81271
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109227
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105688
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113088
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103185
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=41818
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #46 from Jason Merrill ---
The problematic line in the toplevel Makefile is
$(RPATH_ENVVAR)=`echo "$(TARGET_LIB_PATH)$$$(RPATH_ENVVAR)&q
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89237
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67898
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.0|14.0
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 111357, which changed state.
Bug 111357 Summary: [11/12/13/14 Regression] __integer_pack fails to work with
values of dependent type convertible to integers in noexcept context
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111357
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113498
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
The standard has been corrected by P1401 to allow these conversions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95564
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Assignee|ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67898
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112632
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
|--- |FIXED
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for GCC 14.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113498
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112632
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113307
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113403
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113038
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 113038, which changed state.
Bug 113038 Summary: [14 regression] Excess errors for
g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C after r14-6569-gfe54b57728c09a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113038
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113038
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 57053
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57053=edit
second piece
and an accompanying patch to allow P1811 redefinition of classes. I think we
need to extend this to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113038
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 57052
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57052=edit
more general approach WIP for GCC 15
this is the beginning of a more general approach to this issue that also
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for GCC 14.
|--- |FIXED
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Diagnostic added for GCC 14.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113191
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.5|14.0
Resolution|---
|1
Last reconfirmed||2024-01-11
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Doing this for constant initializers for C compatibility makes sense to me.
But it isn't just a matter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113038
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
GCC trunk now lets us associate permerrors with a -W flag, so this would be
pretty trivial to do. It's a matter of adding an option to c-family/c.opt and
doc/invoke.texi and changing the relevant permerror
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113083
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106213
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37722
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105841
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.4|13.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92407
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92145
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105221
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|11.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83264
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill ---
Pinged CWG again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41727
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jason at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97219
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108099
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103185
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94264
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88136
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58055
Bug 58055 depends on bug 58487, which changed state.
Bug 58487 Summary: Missed return value optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58487
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58487
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108975
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jason at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58055
Bug 58055 depends on bug 51571, which changed state.
Bug 51571 Summary: No named return value optimization while adding a dummy scope
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51571
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51571
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 8450 matches
Mail list logo