--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 15:07
---
I don't see a need to backport. Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 19:09
---
Please post result of gfortran -v
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45748
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 19:12
---
I do not see the problem with gfortran 4.3.4 on Cygwin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45748
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 00:53
---
Subject: Bug 45710
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Sep 23 00:53:15 2010
New Revision: 164543
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164543
Log:
2010-09-22 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 00:58
---
Subject: Bug 45532
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Sep 23 00:58:12 2010
New Revision: 164544
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164544
Log:
2010-09-22 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 01:11
---
Subject: Bug 45532
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Sep 23 01:11:16 2010
New Revision: 164545
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164545
Log:
2010-09-22 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 01:19
---
Subject: Bug 45532
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Sep 23 01:19:13 2010
New Revision: 164546
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164546
Log:
2010-09-22 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 01:21
---
Subject: Bug 45532
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Sep 23 01:21:10 2010
New Revision: 164547
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164547
Log:
2010-09-22 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 01:22
---
Backport complete. Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 01:28
---
Subject: Bug 45710
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Sep 23 01:28:39 2010
New Revision: 164548
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164548
Log:
2010-09-22 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 01:43
---
Fixed on trunk. I will backport to 4.5 and 4.4 except the portion dealing with
char4 internal units which is not supported on these earlier releases. Backport
will occur in a few days or weeks. I would like
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 02:26
---
Changed summary of this bug to reflect that I will be adjusting the padding of
internal unit character arrays and initial space on some lines. On my system I
see:
NL1 JUNK
space A= 1.000,JUNK
space B
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 02:52
---
Created an attachment (id=21860)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21860action=view)
Tentative patch, not regression tested
Our interpretation of this:
3 An ampersand character followed
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 03:10
---
Subject: Bug 45723
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Sep 22 03:10:24 2010
New Revision: 164507
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164507
Log:
2010-09-21 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 03:08
---
Here is a case where we do have to evaluate at run time. So maybe we can not
do what is proposed above.
character(10):: advancevar
advancevar = no
write(*, (a), advance=advancevar) Well,
print *, Does it work
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 03:20
---
With current trunk, gfortran 4.6, I get:
BEFORE:
001 @@@
002 @@@
003
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-19 20:01
---
This is an OS specific error. libgfortran is attempting to seek to the end of
the file to prepare for appending. Obviously, one can not seek /dev/null.
I will see if we can detect that the file is unseekable
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-20 04:46
---
Created an attachment (id=21841)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21841action=view)
Possible patch
This patch passes regression testing. Don't seek if filesize is zero.
--
http
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-18 18:18
---
This issue, line ending for namelist to character arrays, has come up before.
I don't remember the outcome of that previous discussion. I will research a
little.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 04:37
---
Subject: Bug 45532
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Sep 14 04:37:02 2010
New Revision: 164266
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164266
Log:
2010-09-14 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 04:39
---
Subject: Bug 45532
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Sep 14 04:39:13 2010
New Revision: 164267
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164267
Log:
2010-09-14 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 04:40
---
Fixed on trunk, will backport to 4.4 and 4.5 in a few days.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-12 15:38
---
When we break abi for kind=8 recl, we should fix all of these. I will assign to
myself so I don't forget. Moving out of enhancement status.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-12 15:42
---
Adding to my list
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-12 15:45
---
I have not tested this with latest trunk, but I wonder if any of the recent
optimization work has improved this. Can it be closed yet?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31139
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-12 16:14
---
Is this something for the FE to do?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36841
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 19:03
---
This is very interesting (aka a real bugger):
Reversing the order of the declarations in
type curve_struct
type (line_struct) line
type (symbol_struct) symbol
end type
to
type curve_struct
type
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 19:27
---
I will have a go at this.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 02:10
---
Update: More responses in comp.lang.fortran bring up the point that if
trim(line)
is supposed to return a temporary, the code might be conforming. Seems that
the
situation is not clear...
Where
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 06:50
---
Subject: Bug 43217
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Aug 27 06:50:03 2010
New Revision: 163581
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163581
Log:
2010-08-27 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 14:02
---
Dominiq, can you test the output of the test case for me on PPC?
hollerith8.f90 in the gfortran post.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43217
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 15:00
---
Subject: Bug 43217
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Aug 27 15:00:11 2010
New Revision: 163588
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163588
Log:
2010-08-27 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 15:01
---
Dominique, thanks for testing that.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43217
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-26 02:13
---
Subject: Bug 41859
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Aug 26 02:12:49 2010
New Revision: 163561
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163561
Log:
2010-08-25 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-21 16:42
---
Created an attachment (id=21539)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21539action=view)
Proposed patch
This patch adds the padding requested. Output of test case matches a few of the
other
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 20:28
---
Subject: Bug 45108
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Aug 19 20:28:09 2010
New Revision: 163387
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163387
Log:
2010-08-19 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 20:32
---
Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 22:56
---
This is not currently diagnosed during compilation. My original plan is to see
if I can do that with the front end and then close it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45143
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 02:36
---
Subject: Bug 41859
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Aug 19 02:35:45 2010
New Revision: 163363
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163363
Log:
2010-08-19 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 03:52
---
Created an attachment (id=21516)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21516action=view)
Proposed patch
This patch will generate an error. If IOSTAT or IOMSG is used, the read will
continue
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 04:01
---
Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-16 06:09
---
The problem resides in resolve_transfer. The checks are not performed because
the expression is wrapped in parenthesis and so the expression is of type
EXPR_OP, so resolve_transfer is just exited. The following
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 03:13
---
Closing now
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 03:18
---
There was some history regarding legacy codes as the reason why this does not
error out. ie looping back and trying again was a feature. I think I may put
this behind -std=legacy. It does seem odd the way we
: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: Cygwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45285
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-14 18:59
---
Subject: Bug 44931
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Aug 14 18:59:18 2010
New Revision: 163245
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163245
Log:
2010-08-14 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-13 15:11
---
I will try the other patch and see what this does.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45186
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-13 17:24
---
With or without the other patch, the gimple code has:
main (integer(kind=4) argc, character(kind=1) * * argv)
[tx_f90_pointers.f90 : 30:0] {
integer(kind=4) D.1535;
static integer(kind=4) options.0[8] = {68
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-13 05:14
---
Subject: Bug 42526
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Aug 13 05:14:18 2010
New Revision: 163220
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163220
Log:
2010-08-12 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-13 05:24
---
Closing.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-09 17:18
---
Paul, can you send me a preview of the new descriptor structure so I can be
planning the internal unit I/O impacts if any.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45128
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-09 00:31
---
Good
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44998
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-07 12:03
---
Subject: Bug 45143
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Aug 7 12:03:23 2010
New Revision: 162978
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162978
Log:
2010-08-07 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-07 12:10
---
Subject: Bug 45143
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Aug 7 12:10:25 2010
New Revision: 162979
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162979
Log:
2010-08-07 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-07 15:43
---
I have the patch for backport to 4.5 applied to my local 4.5 branch and I am
regression testing now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43954
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-07 16:52
---
Subject: Bug 43954
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Aug 7 16:51:55 2010
New Revision: 162980
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162980
Log:
2010-08-07 Daniel Franke franke.dan...@gmail.com
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-07 16:52
---
Subject: Bug 31588
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Aug 7 16:51:55 2010
New Revision: 162980
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162980
Log:
2010-08-07 Daniel Franke franke.dan...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-07 21:10
---
Yes, fixed. I will make a test case out of this with the -Wall so we do not
regress.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-08 01:59
---
Subject: Bug 31588
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Aug 8 01:59:15 2010
New Revision: 162990
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162990
Log:
2010-08-07 Daniel Franke franke.dan...@gmail.com
--- Comment #20 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-08 01:59
---
Subject: Bug 43954
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Aug 8 01:59:15 2010
New Revision: 162990
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162990
Log:
2010-08-07 Daniel Franke franke.dan...@gmail.com
--- Comment #21 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-08 05:29
---
Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-04 02:42
---
This is a duplicate of PR 323
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
Just use -ffloat-store.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 323 ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #137 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-04 02:42
---
*** Bug 45175 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-02 13:19
---
Closing as fixed. Regarding comment #7. I do not see the problem on 4.5. I
reran tests here on my machine that failed with 4.6 and there were no failures
on 4.5
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-01 17:28
---
This appears to be fixed now from the commit of patch in #10. The related
failures showing in gcc test results are no longer there.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45131
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 16:28
---
I can see one here on a 32 bit machine. Moving string.h down in the file as
noted by David Edelsohn fixes it. I also changed the return type to void in
trans-io.c.
Index: inquire.c
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 17:04
---
I see the problem with 4.4.3 as well. I think the patch in #10 is only masking
it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45131
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 14:06
---
#7 confirms my suspicions. I will try to have a look into this in the next few
days. If anyone else has time, please do.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45131
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 14:10
---
Mine
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 01:47
---
Reply to comment #9.
Yes, this is what I was thinking. I wanted to float the first step out there to
see what else we would discover. As seen in PR 45131 there are other oddities
we need to deal
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 01:49
---
This is really odd because the patch does not touch these parts of the library,
at least for inquire_3.f90. I wonder if there is something latent here.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45131
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 01:55
---
I see this as an enhancement.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 00:59
---
I will have a look.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 01:32
---
Subject: Bug 44931
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jul 29 01:32:23 2010
New Revision: 162667
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162667
Log:
2010-07-28 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 14:26
---
Confirmed. Works with -fno-whole-file.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 15:04
---
This patchlet at least works for the reduce test case. Assuming there is
nothing left to translate. I am not sure this is the right approach, bu the
-fdump-tree-original matches for with and without -fno-whole
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 15:08
---
Subject: Bug 42852
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jul 25 15:07:45 2010
New Revision: 162512
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162512
Log:
2010-07-25 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 15:35
---
Subject: Bug 42852
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jul 25 15:35:04 2010
New Revision: 162514
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162514
Log:
2010-07-25 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 15:38
---
Closing as fixed.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 16:21
---
Naturally the patch in #2 breaks everything else for namelists at run time
unless I messed up something else here.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45066
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 17:02
---
I doubt I would be allowed since 4.5.1 is at release candidate 1 phase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42852
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 17:37
---
Here is another possibility. Only one namelist regression with this on.
Index: trans-io.c
===
--- trans-io.c (revision 162507)
+++ trans-io.c
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 19:10
---
Subject: Bug 42852
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jul 25 19:10:09 2010
New Revision: 162518
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162518
Log:
2010-07-25 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 22:24
---
Generally, the gfortran testsuite test cases are testing specific features and
not necessarily strict Standard compliance. There is no need to submit PRs for
test cases unless they fail unexpectedly
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 22:45
---
Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 00:48
---
test_inquire.f90:17.10:
inquire(6,file=str1)
1
Error: INQUIRE statement at (1) cannot contain both FILE and UNIT specifiers
However, with a simple modification to the patch the following works
--- Comment #69 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 01:21
---
Great detective work folks! The sneaky bugs usually are simple to fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40011
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 12:28
---
I was getting back to this and noticed that we no longer ICE on the original
test case. I suppose then this has become an accepts invalid or there is
something not being initialized and the behavior is random
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 04:08
---
Created an attachment (id=21296)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21296action=view)
Proposed pathc
This patch uses ttyname to get the /dev/pts/* name. I have not tried this on a
Windows system
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 03:05
---
With 4.5 about to pop a release it would be good to get this fixed for it, with
release manager approval
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44660
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 04:21
---
Subject: Bug 44697
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jul 21 04:20:58 2010
New Revision: 162362
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162362
Log:
2010-07-20 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 04:25
---
Closing.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #32 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 04:37
---
Rainer, this is OK to back port. Do you want me to do so?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38946
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-19 13:12
---
Subject: Bug 44953
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 19 13:11:54 2010
New Revision: 162304
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162304
Log:
2010-07-19 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-20 01:07
---
Not needed. Closing.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-20 01:09
---
Done.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-20 01:10
---
Fixed, thanks for report.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-20 04:35
---
Kai, would you test this for me please.
Index: ftell_3.f90
===
--- ftell_3.f90 (revision 162291)
+++ ftell_3.f90 (working copy)
@@ -3,9 +3,10
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-18 21:07
---
Created an attachment (id=21245)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21245action=view)
Proposed Patch
Please test the attached patch. This patch cleans up pointer use and adds a
few snippets I
1 - 100 of 3029 matches
Mail list logo
