http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52137
Quentin Neill qneill at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52137
--- Comment #1 from Quentin Neill qneill at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-21
15:15:48 UTC ---
Author: qneill
Date: Tue Feb 21 15:15:42 2012
New Revision: 184440
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184440
Log:
2012-02-21 Quentin Neill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743
--- Comment #9 from Quentin Neill qneill at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07
16:17:35 UTC ---
Author: qneill
Date: Tue Feb 7 16:17:26 2012
New Revision: 183973
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183973
Log:
2012-02-07 Quentin Neill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52137
Bug #: 52137
Summary: bdver2 scheduler needs to be added to bdver1 insn
reservations
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743
--- Comment #8 from Quentin Neill qneill at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-19
20:15:38 UTC ---
Author: qneill
Date: Thu Jan 19 20:15:29 2012
New Revision: 183309
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183309
Log:
2012-01-19 Quentin Neill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743
--- Comment #6 from Quentin Neill qneill at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19
17:57:42 UTC ---
Author: qneill
Date: Mon Dec 19 17:57:32 2011
New Revision: 182489
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182489
Log:
2011-12-19 Quentin Neill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743
Quentin Neill qneill at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qneill at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44416
Quentin Neill qneill at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qneill at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49411
--- Comment #4 from Quentin Neill qneill at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-15
15:38:27 UTC ---
Hi Jakub,
Thanks for looking at this.
I think we need an nargs==3 case for the Compare/Predicate generation
(_mm_com*) intrinsics as well.
And did you mean
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49411
--- Comment #6 from Quentin Neill qneill at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-15
16:39:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
newer patch has been posted
Thanks; I will test this on AMD HW.
test the op of vpermil
Okay.
_mm_com*
I spotted them
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49411
Summary: [4.6/4.7] ICE: unrecognizable insn with -mxop in
_mm_roti_epi8 with negative number
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46422
--- Comment #2 from Quentin Neill qneill at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-16
22:12:08 UTC ---
Fix is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01597.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46422
Quentin Neill qneill at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
13 matches
Mail list logo