[Bug c/96760] Faulty optimization in nested loops with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96760 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/96628] Feature request: __attribute__((no_builtin("Foo")))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96628 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- There is -fno-builtin-memset.

[Bug c++/96387] gnu gmp c source edit g++ internal compiler error appear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96387 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug c/96554] -Wall does not include -Wnull-dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96554 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 96550 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/96550] gcc is smart in figuring out a non-returning function.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96550 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #13 from Andreas

[Bug fortran/96486] get_environment_variable crashes for environment variables that are empty strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96486 --- Comment #25 from Andreas Schwab --- But why does it error out? It shouldn't!

[Bug target/96373] SVE miscompilation on vectorized division loop, leading to FP exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96373 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- > Just note that _all_ floating point operations, not just divisions, can trap > (without fast-math). You never know if the user enabled stops for any of > the FP exceptions (overflow, underflow, inexact,

[Bug other/96287] Empty string argument to gcc should be ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96287 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- If you pass a non-file-name where a file name is expected you are doing something wrong, and you need to fix *that*. Hiding errors is doing a disservice.

[Bug target/96260] RISC-V: -fsanitize=kernel-address is not available after gcc10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96260 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||91441 --- Comment #1 from Andreas

[Bug fortran/52279] Fortran translation issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52279 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab --- If it was enabled by default, you cannot negate it.

[Bug fortran/52279] Fortran translation issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52279 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab --- That means you cannot override a default.

[Bug libquadmath/96016] AArch64: enable libquadmath

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96016 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- You are computing the sine of (double)ld. If you want the sine of a long double value, you need to use the sinl function, also use acosl(-1) to compute pi in long double precision.

[Bug c++/95948] memmove error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95948 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/95934] bootstrap fails in compiler assert in sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cpp:1136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95934 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.3

[Bug bootstrap/95934] bootstrap fails in compiler assert in sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cpp:1136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95934 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/95921] [m68k] invalid codegen for __builtin_sqrt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95921 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- The m68k backend generally does all floating point arithmethic in extended precision for !TARGET_68040, setting FLT_EVAL_METHOD to 2.

[Bug target/95411] Program compiled with nostdlib crashes if passing double to variadic function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95411 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/95783] Inefficient use of the stack when a function takes the address of its argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95783 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- That is already handled through the return address push.

[Bug bootstrap/95712] configure-target-libgcc fails on s390x target because xgcc is not being built

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95712 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab --- > generated for aarch64-linux-gnu that I configured for and it has: You have used --disable-bootstrap.

[Bug target/95671] Fails to build kernel 5.7 with -march=bdver{2,3,4} workaround -mno-tbm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95671 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab --- make arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.i

[Bug target/95154] [11 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95154 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target|ia64-*-*,*-*-darwin*|ia64-*-*

[Bug bootstrap/95555] [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-959

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Host|powerpc64*-linux-gnu|

[Bug bootstrap/95555] [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-959

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- alternative_order[0] is guaranteed to be set, because alternative_reject[i] <= alternative_reject[which_alternative] for i == which_alternative at least. We know that which_alternative <

[Bug target/95450] [10/11 regression] Wrong long double folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95450 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- No, it doesn't.

[Bug target/95450] New: [10 regression] Wrong long double folding

: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- Target: powerpc-*.* $ cat test-float.c #include #include union gl_long_double_union { struct { double hi; double lo; } dd; long double ld; }; const

[Bug c/95429] Wrong code generated for -Os with target m68k on Ubuntu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95429 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/95411] Program compiled with nostdlib crashes if passing double to variadic function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95411 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- Unaligned stack.

[Bug fortran/94690] [OpenMP] omp ... distribute – lastprivate not permitted and more issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94690 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab --- This breaks gfortran.dg/gomp/target1.f90 on riscv. /daten/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/target1.f90:318:0: internal compiler error: in lookup_decl_in_outer_ctx, at omp-low.c:3967 0xbb9b5a

[Bug target/95154] [11 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95154 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- The problem is that when output_constant processes a FDESC_EXPR it calls ASM_OUTPUT_FDESC, which doesn't do weak processing (it doesn't call assemble_external).

[Bug target/95154] New: [11 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- Target: ia64-*-* spawn -ignore SIGHUP /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20200515/Build/gcc/testsuite/g++3/../../xg++ -B

[Bug bootstrap/95122] Cross-compile arm32 toolchain with hard float, but Error in gcc final

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95122 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug bootstrap/95122] Cross-compile arm32 toolchain with hard float, but Error in gcc final

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95122 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- $ CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="${-march=armv7-a -mhard-float}" bash: ${-march=armv7-a -mhard-float}: bad substitution

[Bug go/95059] GCCGO cannot be compiled for ARM64 ILP32 ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95059 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- See .

[Bug c/94981] Wrong casts on Power machines dealing with fctiwuz instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94981 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Converting a negative float to an unsigned integer is undefined.

[Bug target/94950] [8/9/10 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/pr94780.c on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94950 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Similar crash for pr94842.c: /daten/riscv64/gcc/gcc-20200502/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr94842.c:8:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0x74a3af crash_signal ../../gcc/toplev.c:328 0x7ea370

[Bug target/94950] New: [8/9/10 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/pr94780.c on riscv64

Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, wilson at gcc dot gnu.org Blocks: 94780 Target Milestone: --- Target: riscv64-*-* The same as bug 94780 for the riscv

[Bug target/94780] [8/9 Regression] ICE in walk_body at gcc/tree-nested.c:713 since r6-3632-gf6f69fb09c5f81df

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94780 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab --- This also crashes on riscv64: /daten/riscv64/gcc/gcc-20200502/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr94780.c: In function 'foo': /daten/riscv64/gcc/gcc-20200502/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr94780.c:8:1: internal compiler error:

[Bug c++/94896] [10/11 regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94896 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target|sparc-*-* |sparc-*-* riscv64-*-* --- Comment #3

[Bug libstdc++/94900] filesystem recursive_directory_iterator incorrectly skips entries in case directories have no read/execute permissions set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94900 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID

[Bug tree-optimization/94889] Negate function not getting optimised to bitwise not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94889 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- Note that 1<<31 is undefined.

[Bug target/94852] -ffloat-store on x64 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94852 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- For avoiding issues with excess precision there is -fexcess-precision=standard now.

[Bug target/94820] [8/9/10 Regression] pr94780.c fails with ICE on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94820 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||z.zhanghaijian at huawei dot com ---

[Bug target/94821] aarch64: ICE in walk_body at gcc/tree-nested.c:713

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94821 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/94769] Possible use of uninitialized variable num

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94769 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- compare_to_allowed_values doesn't set *num most of the time even when returning non-zero, especially if warn is true.

[Bug target/94706] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706 --- Comment #17 from Andreas Schwab --- With that patch all struct-layout-1.exp tests pass.

[Bug target/94706] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706 --- Comment #15 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 48349 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48349=edit Preprocessed t059_y.C with reduced t059_test.h

[Bug target/94706] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706 --- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 48348 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48348=edit Preprocessed t059_x.C with reduced t059_test.h fail 2854.30

[Bug target/94706] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706 --- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 48347 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48347=edit Preprocessed t058_y.C with reduced t058_test.h

[Bug target/94706] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 48346 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48346=edit Preprocessed t058_x.C with reduced t058_test.h fail 2613.30 fail 2638.30

[Bug target/94706] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 48345 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48345=edit Preprocessed t057_y.C with reduced t057_test.h

[Bug target/94706] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 48344 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48344=edit Preprocessed t057_x.C with reduced t057_test.h fail 2411.55 fail 2411.56 fail 2411.30

[Bug target/94706] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 48343 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48343=edit Preprocessed t056_y.C with reduced t056_test.h

[Bug target/94706] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 48342 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48342=edit Preprocessed t056_x.C with reduced t056_test.h fail 2215.55 fail 2215.56 fail 2215.30

[Bug target/94706] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 48341 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48341=edit Preprocessed t055_y.C with reduced t055_test.h

[Bug target/94706] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 48340 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48340=edit Preprocessed t055_x.C with reduced t055_test.h fail 2006.55 fail 2006.56 fail 2006.30

[Bug target/94706] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 48339 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48339=edit Preprocessed t033_y.C with reduced t033_test.h

[Bug target/94706] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 48338 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48338=edit Preprocessed t033_x.C with reduced t033_test.h fail 545.55

[Bug target/94706] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 48337 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48337=edit Preprocessed t032_y.C with reduced t032_test.h

[Bug target/94706] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 48336 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48336=edit Preprocessed t032_x.C with reduced t032_test.h fail 116.55 fail 116.56 fail 116.30 fail 120.55 fail 142.55 fail

[Bug go/94633] golang 1.14.2 fails to bootstrap using GCC 10 on riscv64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94633 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Try -fno-variable-tracking.

[Bug c++/94359] new test case g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94359 --- Comment #16 from Andreas Schwab --- crtl != cfun

[Bug c++/94359] new test case g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94359 --- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab --- That completely breaks aarch64 (almost every coroutines test): spawn -ignore SIGHUP /opt/gcc/gcc-20200415/Build/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++ -B/opt/gcc/gcc-20200415/Build/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../

[Bug other/94555] [10 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/substr_6.f90 after r10-7665

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94555 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug target/94551] [10 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94551 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---

[Bug target/94551] [10 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94551 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94495#c11

[Bug debug/94495] [10 Regression] Debug info size growth since r10-7515-g2c0fa3ecf70d199a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94495 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab --- Yes, it does.

[Bug debug/94495] [10 Regression] Debug info size growth since r10-7515-g2c0fa3ecf70d199a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94495 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab --- This breaks aarch64 -mabi=ilp32. during RTL pass: vartrack In file included from ../../../../../../libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/pool_allocator.cc:31:

[Bug middle-end/94526] [10 Regression] cselib ICE building glibc sigpause for m68k and microblaze since r10-7575-g8662d0593438ecd498

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94526 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- The bug, I haven't tested the patch yet.

[Bug middle-end/94526] [10 Regression] cselib ICE building glibc sigpause for m68k and microblaze since r10-7575-g8662d0593438ecd498

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94526 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build --- Comment #4 from Andreas

[Bug target/94297] PPCLE std::replace internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94297 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug web/94351] bugzilla search is not as useful as before

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94351 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- When edititing a saved search that has used these fields they are lost.

[Bug target/94103] Wrong optimization: reading value of a variable changes its representation for optimizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94103 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab --- The values of any padding bits are unspecified.

[Bug libstdc++/94213] doesn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94213 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug inline-asm/93942] [Extended-Asm] Last code snippet in 6.47.2.3 Output Operands is unsafe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93942 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- M68K has memory to memory moves.

[Bug c/93910] -Waddress-of-packed-member triggered without actual access to a member or the address of a member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93910 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- The packed attribute forces the alignment to 1, so there is no requirement for its address to be aligned for its type.

[Bug c/93910] -Waddress-of-packed-member triggered without actual access to a member or the address of a member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93910 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- You are still converting an unaligned pointer to an aligned pointer, and the address of a struct is the same as the address if its first member (with suitable conversion).

[Bug c/93894] -Wimplicit-fallthrough false warning with operator %

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93894 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- case -1 is missing.

[Bug c++/93880] missing test for diagnostic: %s%#qD (reversed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93880 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- You can use {\(reversed\)} instead.

[Bug c/93850] 'stack smashing detected' in the special index for an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93850 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 93849 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/93849] 'Segmentation fault' in the special index for an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93849 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/93850] 'stack smashing detected' in the special index for an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93850 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug translation/93759] Invalid % in param

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Apparently the problem is that "% p" looks like a valid c-format.

[Bug rtl-optimization/93565] [9/10 regression] Combine duplicates instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93565 --- Comment #23 from Andreas Schwab --- gcc.target/aarch64/pr93565.c fails with -mabi=ilp32.

[Bug other/91085] fixincludes breaks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91085 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab --- Yes, nothing has changed.

[Bug go/93679] New: gccgo cannot bootstrap go1.14

Assignee: ian at airs dot com Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: cmang at google dot com Target Milestone: --- When trying to bootstrap go1.14 from the release-branch.go1.14 branch with gccgo-10 I'm getting this error: + ./cmd/dist/dist bootstrap -a -v -d Building Go

[Bug other/91085] fixincludes breaks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91085 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- PR80005 is not relevant here.

[Bug c++/93527] Internal compiler error when static_assert concept std::regular on class with variadic constrained constructor.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93527 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- zcat namidevel.pp.cc.gz

[Bug libgcc/90918] -Wreturn-local-addr in __splitstack_find in libgcc/generic-morestack.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90918 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- Can't you use __builtin_frame_address?

[Bug other/91085] fixincludes breaks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91085 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab

[Bug other/93445] New: Misnamed git tags

: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: joseph at codesourcery dot com Target Milestone: --- All annotated tags in the git repository have the wrong name: $ git cat-file -p releases/gcc-9.2.0 object a0c06cc27d2146b7d86758ffa236516c6143d62c type

[Bug libgomp/93066] libgomp/target.c:525:46: error: expected expression before ')' token

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93066 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- Or use (uintptr_t)-1 instead.

[Bug other/93049] limits.h generated by fixincludes breaks cross-compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93049 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Make sure you have sysroot properly set up so that the gcc Makefile finds the system limits.h.

[Bug c++/92951] extern variable declaration doesn't behave properly for me

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92951 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WORKSFORME |INVALID

[Bug target/92922] New: [10 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ldnt1_u32.c -std=c90 -O1 -g -DTEST_FULL (internal compiler error)

Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- Target: aarch64

[Bug libstdc++/92906] New: [10 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check

: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Blocks: 91985 Target Milestone: --- After r278684 all targets that do not support DFP now fail the libstdc++ ABI check. 9 incompatible symbols 0 _ZTIPKDf typeinfo for decimal32 const

[Bug rtl-optimization/90282] internal compiler error: qsort checking failed in snapshot-20190429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90282 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab --- --enable-checking=release

[Bug rtl-optimization/90282] internal compiler error: qsort checking failed in snapshot-20190429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90282 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- Workaround: use release checking.

[Bug middle-end/92824] Wrong optimization: representation of long doubles not copied even with memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92824 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- On m68k the padding is internal, and actually part of the representation.

[Bug go/92820] [10 Regression] libgo.so.15 has executable stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92820 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Don't see that on aarch64 or riscv64.

[Bug c/92673] OCaml fails to link with recent trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92673 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >