http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
--- Comment #4 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-12-19 18:33:07
UTC ---
Yes, this was failing on ia64 hpux as well as hppa hpux.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51144
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51144
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|s390-ibm-linux |s390-ibm-linux,ia64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51144
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-11-16 00:43:15
UTC ---
I think this is a big-endian bug in fprint_whex, etc. IA64 HP-UX is
big endian and I think s390-ibm-linux is too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51032
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|alpha-dec-osf5.1b, |alpha-dec-osf5.1b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51032
--- Comment #10 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-11-08 23:08:37
UTC ---
I did a successful bootstrap on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 with the patch. I am
still running the test suite.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
--- Comment #7 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-10-25 19:53:31
UTC ---
Bootstrapping and testing both look good with the patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
Bug #: 50826
Summary: bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in
mem_loc_descriptor
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-10-21 20:46:46
UTC ---
Created attachment 25573
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25573
small test case
Test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-10-21 20:55:47
UTC ---
forgot to mention that the test case needs to be compiled with -O2 -g to
reproduce the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37678
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48823
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48823
--- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-10-13 20:16:46
UTC ---
I am not sure any set of flags will guarantee strict IEEE floating point
behavior. See PR37845 for some more information.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38018
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49967
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50153
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9635
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9635
--- Comment #8 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-09-27 18:23:56
UTC ---
No, the patch I mentioned was not sent to this project. If I am reading the
web site correctly (the first link in comment #6), I think the patch was sent
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50153
--- Comment #9 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-08-23 20:55:15
UTC ---
I think all I need to do is expand the existing hpux11_abs fixinclude rule
from 'ia64-hp-hpux11*' to '*-hp-hpux11*' I am currently testing this.
The other checks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50153
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50153
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-08-22 23:31:20
UTC ---
I am testing an inclhack.def header file fixup for abs. I am not sure if any
of the other header files checks on __cplusplus will be a problem but fixing
the abs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49967
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49810
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49746
--- Comment #9 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-07-15 16:03:16
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Using the 4.2.4 I had available, I got gcc-4.6.1 installed.
Still doesn't pass perl build:
CCCMD = gcc64 -DPERL_CORE -c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49746
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dave.anglin at bell
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
--- Comment #14 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-06-21 15:21:44
UTC ---
The bootstrap and testing of this patch on IA64 looks good. There were no
regressions and it seems to have fixed all the test cases that started breaking
on IA64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49454
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-06-21 15:48:14
UTC ---
I built an hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 compiler with --disable-bootstrap and then ran
the test suite to see if I could get a smaller test case. The tests are still
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49454
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-06-21 16:26:44
UTC ---
I should have mentioned in comment #2 that the build and test I did included
the proposed patch in comment #11 pf PR 49429.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49443
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-06-20 17:12:41
UTC ---
Yes, the patch in comment #2 fixes the failures on IA64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
--- Comment #13 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-06-20 21:18:18
UTC ---
Yes, it fixed the test case on ia64-hp-hpux11.23. I will put it in my nightly
bootstrap and test setup and let you know the results of that tomorrow.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49454
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
--- Comment #10 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-06-17 20:49:22
UTC ---
With regards to the question in comment #9, you would probably do better asking
it on the gcc-patches mailing list then in the comment of this bug report since
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49443
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c and vect-peel-4.c fail on
IA64 after testsuite change
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49443
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-06-16 16:13:42
UTC ---
Created attachment 24547
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24547
Dump file with vectorize details
Dump file from vect-peel-3.c when run
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49414
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
Summary: dse.c changes to fix PR44194 (r175063) cause execution
failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-06-15 22:37:24
UTC ---
Created attachment 24540
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24540
Cut down version of gcc.dg/struct-by-value-1.c
This is a cutdown version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-06-15 22:38:15
UTC ---
Created attachment 24541
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24541
dse dump of x.c before change was made
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
--- Comment #4 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-06-15 22:39:26
UTC ---
Created attachment 24542
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24542
dse dump of x.c after change was made
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49349
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-06-13 19:29:56
UTC ---
I tested the patch from comment #1 and it fixed gfortran.dg/char_result_3.f90.
I got one regression on IA64 Linux but I can't reproduce it so I think it was
just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49349
Summary: gfortran.dg/char_result_3.f90 fails with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #10 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-06-08 18:12:40
UTC ---
How about compiling this with -Wcast-align and looking for a warning message:
char *y;
typedef char __attribute__ ((__aligned__(__BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__))) c;
c *z
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #12 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-06-08 20:07:04
UTC ---
Checking for a warning using check_no_compiler_messages seems as easy or easier
then checking the return code so I did that. I have submitted a patch to
gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #20 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-05-06 23:04:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
(In reply to comment #6)
The patch works for me on ia64-hp-hpux11.23. It fixed the four new
failures I
had and caused
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-05-03 15:02:26
UTC ---
Yes, I am seeing some new failures on IA64 HP-UX. I do not get the stackalign
failures but I do get:
FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/static-local-var-in-ctor.C scan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-05-03 22:15:38
UTC ---
The patch works for me on ia64-hp-hpux11.23. It fixed the four new failures I
had and caused no regressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-04-27 21:58:53
UTC ---
It looks like I was wrong about this showing up on IA64 Linux. I am only
seeing it on IA64 HP-UX and only in 32 bit mode. That probably means it is
related
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48629
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673
Summary: [4.7 Regression] GCC generates WAW and RAW conflicts
on IA64.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48629
Summary: ICE on gcc.dg/pr42389.c on ia64-*-* with
-fsched-pressure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48469
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
Summary: ia64-*-* does not bootstrap due to unused variables in
dbxout.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-04-05 20:44:32
UTC ---
FYI: I could not find a changelog entry for the r171981 change to dbxout.c.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48469
--- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-04-05 20:43:47
UTC ---
I have submitted it as PR 48471.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
--- Comment #4 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-04-05 21:20:09
UTC ---
The patch looks good. I haven't finished my bootstrap but I am in stage2 and
dbxout.c compiled correctly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
--- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-04-05 23:12:25
UTC ---
Bootstrap finished, everything looked good.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48288
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
--- Comment #4 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-03-22 16:20:15
UTC ---
I agree. The test is not verifying whether or not snprintf is getting inlined
and that was what bug 47917 was about. This should be a compile test that
looks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-03-22 16:59:03
UTC ---
I guess we disagree on what the test should be doing. I agree that it is a
valid test for showing that nothing gets broken when doing the optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
--- Comment #8 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-03-22 17:13:29
UTC ---
OK, that is what I was missing. I didn't notice there was a second test to
check for that, sorry for the confusion.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |sje at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48191
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #11 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-03-21 17:30:34
UTC ---
*** Bug 48191 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48191
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-03-18 19:31:20
UTC ---
Created attachment 23714
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23714
shorter test case
Shorter test case. Reproducible on IA64 HP-UX as well
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48191
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48191
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-03-18 23:40:43
UTC ---
It looks like this is the same problem as PR 43603 (but with a different error
result). I can reproduce it on the trunk at r167587, but it is fixed at
r167588
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #9 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-03-18 23:45:07
UTC ---
Andrey,
I was just looking at PR 48191, a bug submitted against GCC 4.5.2. It looks
like it is caused by the same problem that this patch fixes. Can you back
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #13 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-03-17 20:10:06
UTC ---
I got good builds on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and hppa64-hp-hpux11.11. I haven't
done a full test run yet.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #14 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-03-17 23:14:22
UTC ---
I ran the GCC testsuite on the compilers I built with the patch and did not
have any regressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
Summary: [4.6 regression] hppa*-*-* will not bootstrap on 4.6
branch with release checking
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47866
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-03-09 17:26:44
UTC ---
I tried the patch in comment #2 and verified that it fixes vector-2.c on IA64
HP-UX and Linux and caused no regressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
--- Comment #20 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-03-01 21:50:38
UTC ---
It is still working for me on ia64-hp-hpux11.23 in 32 and 64 bit
modes but it is failing on my ia64-debian-linux-gnu system. I failed to notice
that earlier.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47866
Summary: gcc.dg/torture/vector-2.c fails on IA64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43494
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43494
--- Comment #35 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-02-09 23:42:57
UTC ---
I think it is PR47614, I tried the first patch in that defect report and it
fixed my test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46997
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46997
Summary: new ia64 vector instructions are broken on HP-UX
(big-endian)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46204
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #91 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2010-10-29 22:29:10
UTC ---
I just noticed that the latest patch is causing a failure of
gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 with -O1 on my ia64-hp-hpux11.23 platform.
Note that the original
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #93 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2010-10-29 22:39:00
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #92)
See followup here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01636.html
Ah yes, that's better.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46204
Summary: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/throw-1.C fails to compile
on IA64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: link-failure
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46120
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46044
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46044
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2010-10-26 23:46:04
UTC ---
This may be related to PR 43603.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #87 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2010-10-19 16:09:57
UTC ---
My testing on 32 bit and 64 bit PA boxes went fine. The patch looks good to
me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169
--- Comment #17 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2010-10-18 15:51:52
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Based on my posted test results for hppa2.0-hp-hpux11.11, this PR was
fixed on the trunk between r163182 and r163254.
Need to find
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169
--- Comment #18 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2010-10-18 16:55:32
UTC ---
It looks like this was fixed (for hppa at least) in r163190.
2010-08-12 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/45232
* tree
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169
--- Comment #20 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2010-10-18 17:54:42
UTC ---
Not really, there are about 300 lines of new code (mostly in a new routine).
It might be that only the change in can_reassociate_p is needed to fix this
bug
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
