Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] P1689R5 support

2023-09-20 Thread Ben Boeckel via Gcc
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 17:33:34 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > Pushed, thanks! Thanks! Is there a process I can use to backport this to GCC 13? --Ben

Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] P1689R5 support

2023-09-20 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 17:33:34 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > Pushed, thanks! Thanks! Is there a process I can use to backport this to GCC 13? --Ben

Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] P1689R5 support

2023-09-19 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc
On 9/1/23 09:04, Ben Boeckel wrote: Hi, This patch series adds initial support for ISO C++'s [P1689R5][], a format for describing C++ module requirements and provisions based on the source code. This is required because compiling C++ with modules is not embarrassingly parallel and need to be

Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] P1689R5 support

2023-09-19 Thread Jason Merrill
On 9/1/23 09:04, Ben Boeckel wrote: Hi, This patch series adds initial support for ISO C++'s [P1689R5][], a format for describing C++ module requirements and provisions based on the source code. This is required because compiling C++ with modules is not embarrassingly parallel and need to be

[PATCH v8 0/4] P1689R5 support

2023-09-01 Thread Ben Boeckel via Gcc-patches
Hi, This patch series adds initial support for ISO C++'s [P1689R5][], a format for describing C++ module requirements and provisions based on the source code. This is required because compiling C++ with modules is not embarrassingly parallel and need to be ordered to ensure that `import

[PATCH v8 0/4] P1689R5 support

2023-09-01 Thread Ben Boeckel via Gcc
Hi, This patch series adds initial support for ISO C++'s [P1689R5][], a format for describing C++ module requirements and provisions based on the source code. This is required because compiling C++ with modules is not embarrassingly parallel and need to be ordered to ensure that `import