Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15)

2010-03-16 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
42509, arm-gnueabi doesn't bootstrap but is a primary target I haven't had the time in the past few weeks to work on this effectively. I'll be able to find some time to work on this during this week and will get back on this. cheers Ramana

Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15)

2010-03-16 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, NightStrike wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote: As maintainers do not care for P1 bugs in their maintainance area so will the release managers not consider them P1. Probably not the best reason to downgrade a bug, eh?

Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15)

2010-03-16 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote: On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, NightStrike wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote: As maintainers do not care for P1 bugs in their maintainance area so will the release managers not

Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15)

2010-03-16 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Steven Bosscher wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote: On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, NightStrike wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote: As maintainers do not care for P1 bugs in their

Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15)

2010-03-16 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote: On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Steven Bosscher wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote: On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, NightStrike wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Richard Guenther

Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15)

2010-03-16 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Richi, Steven, To be fair the people of that company do not expose bugs proportional to their headcount either. Neither do I, and yet I try to help ;-) Now, now, you two :-) Paul

Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15)

2010-03-16 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Richard Guenther wrote: 42509, arm-gnueabi doesn't bootstrap but is a primary target The primary target is arm-eabi, which is a bare-metal target; the arm-eabi and mipsisa64-elf references must be understood as referring to building and testing a cross compiler from some

GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15)

2010-03-15 Thread Richard Guenther
Status == The trunk is still in stage 4 which means it is open under the usual release branch rules. Thus the trunk is open for regression and documentation fixes only. There are currently 16 P1 bugs that block the release. If you are assigned to any P1 GCC 4.5 regression please either

Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15)

2010-03-15 Thread Jeff Law
On 03/15/10 10:18, Richard Guenther wrote: Status == The trunk is still in stage 4 which means it is open under the usual release branch rules. Thus the trunk is open for regression and documentation fixes only. There are currently 16 P1 bugs that block the release. If you are assigned

Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15)

2010-03-15 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Jeff Law wrote: On 03/15/10 10:18, Richard Guenther wrote: Status == The trunk is still in stage 4 which means it is open under the usual release branch rules. Thus the trunk is open for regression and documentation fixes only. There are currently 16

Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15)

2010-03-15 Thread NightStrike
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote: As maintainers do not care for P1 bugs in their maintainance area so will the release managers not consider them P1. Probably not the best reason to downgrade a bug, eh?

Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15)

2010-03-15 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
Richard Guenther wrote: Status == The trunk is still in stage 4 which means it is open under the usual release branch rules. Thus the trunk is open for regression and documentation fixes only. What does that means with respect to plugin related code? See my message on