On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:07:36PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
The patch I've posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00493.html is intended to
be mainline-ready (with the hopes that other people may pick up the ObjC
and OpenMP issues, and floating-point handling for
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:07:36PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
The patch I've posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00493.html is intended to
be mainline-ready (with the hopes that other people may pick up the ObjC
and OpenMP
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 01:23:20PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:07:36PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
The patch I've posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00493.html is intended to
be
The patch I've posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00493.html is intended to
be mainline-ready (with the hopes that other people may pick up the ObjC
and OpenMP issues, and floating-point handling for non-x86 targets, once
it's in mainline). If that gets in in time for 4.9
On 11/06/13 15:07, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
The patch I've posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00493.html is intended to
be mainline-ready
[ ... ]
Joseph, just wanted to say thanks for picking this up and running with
it. It was a tough decision to have Andrew put the work
I don't have the time to finish pushing through the C11 atomic work for
this release. Much of the remaining parts are in the parser, which I
know very little about, and I won't be able to do a sufficient job in
the time remaining, so I am switching my focus to the interface work and
getting
If C11 atomics are not going into 4.9, then comments made to reject
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58016 no longer hold and I
would ask that the resolution of both it and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53769 be reconsidered.
Jeff
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Andrew
