On 16/07/2020 12:11, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 15 2020, Erick Ochoa wrote:
On 15.07.20 05:03, Martin Jambor wrote:
[...]
At IPA time, the best way is always to look at the call graph edges,
something like:
cgraph_edge *cs = caller_cgraph_node->get_edge (s);
examine
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 15 2020, Erick Ochoa wrote:
> On 15.07.20 05:03, Martin Jambor wrote:
[...]
>> At IPA time, the best way is always to look at the call graph edges,
>> something like:
>>
>> cgraph_edge *cs = caller_cgraph_node->get_edge (s);
>> examine (e->callee);
>>
>> Note that if
On 15.07.20 05:03, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 14 2020, Erick Ochoa wrote:
On 14/07/2020 12:37, Erick Ochoa wrote:
Hello,
I have a function foo defined on a source file. Sometimes, a function
pointer pointing to foo is passed as a parameter to other functions
where foo is called
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 15 2020, Erick Ochoa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I narrowed down that ipa-inline is marking these indirect functions as
> unreachable (these functions have been specialized and therefore should
> now be direct functions). Therefore, symtab_remove_unreachable_nodes is
> called on them.
Hi,
I narrowed down that ipa-inline is marking these indirect functions as
unreachable (these functions have been specialized and therefore should
now be direct functions). Therefore, symtab_remove_unreachable_nodes is
called on them. Running the following (immediately after materialization):
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 14 2020, Erick Ochoa wrote:
> On 14/07/2020 12:37, Erick Ochoa wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a function foo defined on a source file. Sometimes, a function
>> pointer pointing to foo is passed as a parameter to other functions
>> where foo is called indirectly. This indirect
Actually, another interesting hint is that the original foo function
takes two parameters. The function I am seeing inside the
FOR_EACH_FUNCTION_WITH_GIMPLE_BODY is a specialized function of foo with
only 1 parameter. However, the indirect function call is a version of
foo which has not been
