Re: Using movw/movt rather than minipools in ARM gcc

2012-05-02 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:24 PM, David Sehr s...@google.com wrote: Hello All, We are using gcc trunk as of 4/27/12, and are attempting to add support to the ARM gcc compiler for Native Client. We are trying to get gcc -march=armv7-a to use movw/movt consistently instead of minipools. The

Re: Fwd: Using movw/movt rather than minipools in ARM gcc

2012-04-30 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 27/04/12 21:24, David Sehr wrote: Hello All, We are using gcc trunk as of 4/27/12, and are attempting to add support to the ARM gcc compiler for Native Client. We are trying to get gcc -march=armv7-a to use movw/movt consistently instead of minipools. The motivation is for a new target

Re: Fwd: Using movw/movt rather than minipools in ARM gcc

2012-04-30 Thread Roland McGrath
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote: It very much depends on your processor. I suppose we are probably concerned primarily with recentish OMAP and Tegra2 sorts of processors, but we are looking for generic good performance solutions for ARMv7-A class

Fwd: Using movw/movt rather than minipools in ARM gcc

2012-04-27 Thread David Sehr
Hello All, We are using gcc trunk as of 4/27/12, and are attempting to add support to the ARM gcc compiler for Native Client. We are trying to get gcc -march=armv7-a to use movw/movt consistently instead of minipools. The motivation is for a new target variant where armv7-a is the minimum