Kai Tietz wrote:
2011/10/24 Bob Breuer breu...@mc.net:
Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi,
For trunk-version I have a tentative patch for this issue. On 4.6.x
and older branches this doesn't work, as here we can't differenciate
that easy between ms- and sysv-abi.
But could somebody give this patch a
Applied a fix to trunk at rev. 180423 and to 4.6.x branch at rev. 180422.
Regards,
Kai
Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi,
For trunk-version I have a tentative patch for this issue. On 4.6.x
and older branches this doesn't work, as here we can't differenciate
that easy between ms- and sysv-abi.
But could somebody give this patch a try?
Regards,
Kai
ChangeLog
*
2011/10/24 Bob Breuer breu...@mc.net:
Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi,
For trunk-version I have a tentative patch for this issue. On 4.6.x
and older branches this doesn't work, as here we can't differenciate
that easy between ms- and sysv-abi.
But could somebody give this patch a try?
Regards,
Kai
On 10/24/2011 09:18 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
A possible patch for 4.6 gcc versions I attached to this mail.
...
+/* For 32-bit Windows we need valid frame-pointer for function using
+ setjmp. */
+#define SUBTARGET_SETJMP_NEED_FRAME_POINTER \
+ (!TARGET_64BIT cfun-calls_setjmp)
+
Index:
2011/10/24 Richard Henderson r...@twiddle.net:
On 10/24/2011 09:18 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
A possible patch for 4.6 gcc versions I attached to this mail.
...
+/* For 32-bit Windows we need valid frame-pointer for function using
+ setjmp. */
+#define SUBTARGET_SETJMP_NEED_FRAME_POINTER \
+
2011/10/22 xunxun xunxun1...@gmail.com:
于 2011/10/22 13:13, xunxun 写道:
Hi, all
It seems that gcc's auto-omit-frame-pointer has other problems.
The example is from mingw bug tracker:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3426555group_id=2435atid=102435
g++ -O3 main.cpp
On 2011-10-20 23:34, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi,
For trunk-version I have a tentative patch for this issue. On 4.6.x
and older branches this doesn't work, as here we can't differenciate
that easy between ms- and sysv-abi.
But could somebody give this patch a try?
Regards,
Kai
ChangeLog
On 2011-10-21 AM 12:34, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi,
For trunk-version I have a tentative patch for this issue. On 4.6.x
and older branches this doesn't work, as here we can't differenciate
that easy between ms- and sysv-abi.
But could somebody give this patch a try?
Regards,
Kai
ChangeLog
Hi, all
It seems that gcc's auto-omit-frame-pointer has other problems.
The example is from mingw bug tracker:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3426555group_id=2435atid=102435
g++ -O3 main.cpp running will crash.
g++ -O2 main.cpp running no crash.
于 2011/10/22 13:13, xunxun 写道:
Hi, all
It seems that gcc's auto-omit-frame-pointer has other problems.
The example is from mingw bug tracker:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3426555group_id=2435atid=102435
g++ -O3 main.cpp running will crash.
g++ -O2
On 2011-10-20 AM 6:05, Bob Breuer wrote:
We probably have a difference in build or run environment. I've
double-checked with another machine and can get the same crash in
longjmp when running the test executable on both WinXP and Win2k, but
not on Win7. So it looks like Microsoft may have
2011/10/20 xunxun xunxun1...@gmail.com:
Hi, all
I think this issue causes the gdb crash on XP.
You can see the thread: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2011-10/msg00056.html
My many friends and I can reproduce this crash issue, but no problem on Win7.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Bob
Hi,
For trunk-version I have a tentative patch for this issue. On 4.6.x
and older branches this doesn't work, as here we can't differenciate
that easy between ms- and sysv-abi.
But could somebody give this patch a try?
Regards,
Kai
ChangeLog
* config/i386/i386.c
Kai Tietz wrote:
2011/10/18 Bob Breuer breu...@mc.net:
Kai Tietz wrote:
2011/10/17 Bob Breuer breu...@mc.net:
Richard Henderson wrote:
On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote:
Google finds a mention of longjmp failing with -fomit-frame-pointer:
On 10/19/2011 02:05 PM, Bob Breuer wrote:
Is it possible to force a
stackframe by just adding a suitable attribute to either the setjmp
function prototype, or the function which calls setjmp?
The only thing I can think of that'll be portable to a large number
of versions of GCC is
{
int
Hi, all
I think this issue causes the gdb crash on XP.
You can see the thread: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2011-10/msg00056.html
My many friends and I can reproduce this crash issue, but no problem on Win7.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Bob Breuer breu...@mc.net wrote:
Kai Tietz wrote:
On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote:
I don't think this is a free/g_free issue. If I use the following
patch, then I at least get the openbios messages:
diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
index a9fa608..dfbd6ea 100644
--- a/cpu-exec.c
+++ b/cpu-exec.c
@@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ static
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Richard Henderson r...@twiddle.net wrote:
On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote:
I don't think this is a free/g_free issue. If I use the following
patch, then I at least get the openbios messages:
diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
index
On 10/17/2011 12:14 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
IIRC buggy versions of alloca() could also fail without a frame pointer.
(1) GCC always uses a frame pointer for alloca,
(2) Unless you do -fno-builtin-alloca, we always implement it inline.
r~
Richard Henderson wrote:
On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote:
I don't think this is a free/g_free issue. If I use the following
patch, then I at least get the openbios messages:
diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
index a9fa608..dfbd6ea 100644
--- a/cpu-exec.c
+++ b/cpu-exec.c
@@
Kai Tietz wrote:
2011/10/17 Bob Breuer breu...@mc.net:
Richard Henderson wrote:
On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote:
I don't think this is a free/g_free issue. If I use the following
patch, then I at least get the openbios messages:
diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
index
2011/10/18 Bob Breuer breu...@mc.net:
Kai Tietz wrote:
2011/10/17 Bob Breuer breu...@mc.net:
Richard Henderson wrote:
On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote:
I don't think this is a free/g_free issue. If I use the following
patch, then I at least get the openbios messages:
diff --git
23 matches
Mail list logo
