http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=249
Summary: GCC 4.7.4 Rel 1 Dev 2014-01-08: mktime() returns wrong
value
Product: GCC/GCCSDK
Version: other
Platform: Other
OS/Version: RISC OS
Status: NEW
GCCSDK GCC 4.7.4 Release 1 Development 4.7.4 2014-01-08
http://www.riscos.info/downloads/gccsdk/testing/4.7.4/gccsdk-gcc-bin-4.7.4-Rel1dev.zip
SharedUnixLibrary 1.12
VirtualRPC-Adjust RISCOS 4.39
The execute permission bit for Text files has changed to be the same as
for other filetypes. So the
In message 53185d39.9090...@sky.com
Lee Noar leen...@sky.com wrote:
On 05/03/14 21:41, Theo Markettos wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 08:06:57PM +, Lee Noar wrote:
I tried the test binaries, both dynamic and static, with RISC OS running
in rpcemu. They both worked as expected.
In message 531b1ae9.9010...@gmx.com
Duncan Moore duncan.mo...@gmx.com wrote:
GCCSDK GCC 4.7.4 Release 1 Development 4.7.4 2014-01-08
http://www.riscos.info/downloads/gccsdk/testing/4.7.4/gccsdk-gcc-bin-4.7.4-Rel1dev.zip
SharedUnixLibrary 1.12
VirtualRPC-Adjust RISCOS 4.39
The
John Tytgat john.tyt...@aaug.net wrote:
I think it would be better to derive this from RISC OS filetype, i.e.
test on Obey, Absolute, ELF, Module, Utility (any others ?).
If you allowed Obey, why not BASIC? And then, why not Lua, REXX, Python etc
- how would the code know whether to treat an
In message mpro.n24muc00igub60...@wingsandbeaks.org.uk.invalid
Jeremy Nicoll - ml roinfo jn.ml.roi...@wingsandbeaks.org.uk wrote:
John Tytgat john.tyt...@aaug.net wrote:
I think it would be better to derive this from RISC OS filetype, i.e.
test on Obey, Absolute, ELF, Module,
On 08/03/2014 17:33, John Tytgat wrote:
In message mpro.n24muc00igub60...@wingsandbeaks.org.uk.invalid
Jeremy Nicoll - ml roinfo jn.ml.roi...@wingsandbeaks.org.uk wrote:
John Tytgat john.tyt...@aaug.net wrote:
I think it would be better to derive this from RISC OS filetype, i.e.
Hi John,
I think it would be better to derive this from RISC OS filetype,
i.e. test on Obey, Absolute, ELF, Module, Utility (any
others?).
If you allowed Obey, why not BASIC? And then, why not Lua, REXX,
Python etc - how would the code know whether to treat an arbitrary
On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 04:34:37PM +0100, John Tytgat wrote:
Roughly a year ago I did several UnixLib fixes for returning more
accurate errno error values and made a small unittest framework
(recipe/files/gcc/libunixlib/unittest) for testing these changes. It
would be interesting to have
http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=249
John Tytgat john.tyt...@aaug.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
In message 20140308201749.gy6...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Theo Markettos t...@markettos.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 04:34:37PM +0100, John Tytgat wrote:
Roughly a year ago I did several UnixLib fixes for returning more
accurate errno error values and made a small unittest
11 matches
Mail list logo