--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-09 08:07
---
works with recent snapshots.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
I've installed the gcc-4.0.0-0.20050305.1 with enabled c, c++ and ada.
Now I'm trying rebuild gcc with added java, objc and fortran support
but install fails. It worked several snapshots ago, now it's broken.
--
Summary: invalid install/relink of llibgcj{,0_convenience} during
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-09 08:18
---
Created an attachment (id=8368)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8368action=view)
install log.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20392
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |pch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20315
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
08:34 ---
This does not make sense:
(cd
/home/users/pluto/multimedia/rpm/BUILD/gcc-4.0-20050305/obj-i686-pld-linux/i686-pld-
linux/libjava; /bin/sh ./libtool --tag CXX --mode=relink
--- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2005-03-09 08:51
---
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:02:08AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Mar 8, 2005, Jakub Jelinek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
09:04 ---
Now that the new verifier has been enabled, this bug has been fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
GCC build triplet|
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
09:06 ---
This bug should have been fixed by enabling the new verifier.
Can you please check?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12734
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
09:11 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
The jar-files which caused the problem:
http://www.scheinwelt.at/~norbertf/gcj/tests/gcjverifybug_test.tar.gz
I could not download this file - can you please put it back in?
--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-03-09 09:14
---
(In reply to comment #4)
Where can I find some documentation on using this extended asm format? I
have read all the GNU docs on it and can not understand how to use it.
Well, those docs are all we have. If you
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
09:15 ---
Fixed on the mainline after the new verifier was enabled.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2005-03-09 09:23
---
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:02:08AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Mar 8, 2005, Jakub Jelinek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Additional Comments From postfach at nfrese dot net 2005-03-09 09:39
---
Subject: Re: gcj compiling from jar files - verification
error
I put it here:
http://www.scheinwelt.at/~norbertf/files/gcj/other_tests/
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 10:11, rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
10:26 ---
Thanks.
Now the verification errors are gone, but I'm still not
able to build the package (with or without -findirect-dispatch):
8
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
10:30 ---
Subject: [PR middle-end/18628] do not fold to label load from tablejump to reg
This patch is meant to implement suggestion #3 proposed to fix the bug
by Roger Sayle and selected by RTH in bugzilla. So far,
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-03-09
10:30 ---
If the patch was committed last year, what is this bug for, exactly?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20365
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
10:55 ---
I do not see an ICE with the given testcase as of 2005-03-09 and mainline CVS.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
10:57 ---
Now that the new verifier has been enabled, this works quite fine.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
Bug 18212 depends on bug 20351, which changed state.
Bug 20351 Summary: compilation with a redundant jar fails, if output file
specified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20351
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
11:03 ---
I can still see a crash similar to what Tom is seeing, but the other two
bugs are fixed - the break-up was not correct.
--
What|Removed |Added
1.)
gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2.2/specs
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix
--disable-checking --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit
--host=i386-redhat-linux
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
11:35 ---
Looking at it.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
--- Additional Comments From sailors3 at comcast dot net 2005-03-09 12:00
---
Subject: RE: internal compiler error with bogus asm output constraint
Hello,
I apologize if my question sounded like criticism, It is really more of a
reflection on me (my ability to learn) than on GHU.
--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-03-09 12:30
---
(In reply to comment #6)
I guess I'm not properly interpreting the documentation on how to use
registers in the asm, is that correct?
Yes, that's correct :-) I suggest you ask at [EMAIL PROTECTED], preferably
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
12:39 ---
The problem is that we leave out a call to _Jv_InitClass for a static
private method thinking that it is unreachable. This is not the case
for a private static inner class method. A simple pessimistic
fix
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
12:54 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
If the patch was committed last year, what is this bug for, exactly?
The patch was committed to a branch, but not to mainline. I already had a
number
of unreviewed patches
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
12:57 ---
Subject: Bug 20186
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-09 12:57:14
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog pt.c
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
13:15 ---
Subject: Bug 20186
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-09 13:14:58
Modified files:
gcc/cp :
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
13:16 ---
2005-03-08 Nathan Sidwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c++/20186
* pt.c (contains_dependent_cast_p): New.
(fold_non_dependent_expr): Call it.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-09 13:49
---
(In reply to comment #2)
This does not make sense:
(cd
/home/users/pluto/multimedia/rpm/BUILD/gcc-4.0-20050305/obj-i686-pld-linux/i686-pld-
linux/libjava; /bin/sh ./libtool --tag CXX
--mode=relink
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
14:02 ---
This works for many people.
Can you attach the preprocessed source?
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From andreas dot hoehmann at gmx dot de 2005-03-09
14:17 ---
i try ;)
/tmp/kde/gcc-3.4.2/gcc/xgcc -v -save-temps -shared-libgcc
-B/tmp/kde/gcc-3.4.2/gcc/ -nostdinc++
-L/tmp/kde/gcc-3.4.2/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src
--- Additional Comments From andreas dot hoehmann at gmx dot de 2005-03-09
14:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=8369)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8369action=view)
preprocessed files
i hope i tar-ed the right files.
i do:
cd i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src
tar
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
14:34 ---
Does the following C file compile without warning?
I think this is a bug in glibc (or whos every assert.h you are using).
#include assert.h
void f(char *a)
{
assert(a);
}
--
Hello,
I managed to get jdbc MSSQL ORACLE test apps work just fine. I have not been
able to make DB2 work. Here is what I get. Does this mean something is missing
on the gcj classes ? I can provide sample source and the shared libs and/or the
jars
[EMAIL PROTECTED] DB]$ ./db2test
jdbcDB2
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
14:40 ---
Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: while resolving
class: com.ibm.db2.jcc.b.i
This means either ibm's .jar file contains classes which reference other
classes which are not there and
--- Additional Comments From andreas dot hoehmann at gmx dot de 2005-03-09
14:43 ---
cat assert_test.c
#include assert.h
void f(char *a)
{
assert(a);
}
int main()
{
}
gcc assert_test.c -o assert_test
assert_test.c: In function `f':
assert_test.c:4: warning: passing arg 1 of
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
14:51 ---
A proposed patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q1/msg00684.html
As noted there, there is still a problem with either
GCJ or gij for this testcase.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
15:01 ---
The only thing I can say is that this is a bug in glibc you are using. I
wonder where __builtin_expect
comes from.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20393
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
15:09 ---
Ok, here the situation, glibc removed the __builtin_expect in October of last
year. And had add it in
August 2003. So any reason between then and now were broken. In fact it was
fixed two days later
--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-03-09
15:13 ---
$ cat eoshift.f90
print *,eoshift((/1, 3/), 3)
end
$ gfortran eoshift.f90
$ ./a.out
Segmentation fault
This fails because the loop
for (n = 0; n len; n++)
{
memcpy (dest,
--- Additional Comments From andreas dot hoehmann at gmx dot de 2005-03-09
15:32 ---
it's a red hat 9 standardinstalltion
rpm -qa | grep glibc
glibc-devel-2.3.2-71
glibc-common-2.3.2-71
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-8.10
glibc-2.3.2-71
rpm -qa | grep libstd
libstdc++-3.2.2-5
--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-03-09
16:01 ---
The complaint is a segfault at runtime when
you actually want to do anything with the
string whose length depends on a missing
optional argument. This isn't too bad (the
same thing happens if you
--- Additional Comments From tow21 at cam dot ac dot uk 2005-03-09 16:11
---
(In reply to comment #1)
The complaint is a segfault at runtime when
you actually want to do anything with the
string whose length depends on a missing
optional argument. This isn't too bad (the
--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2005-03-09 16:13
---
Subject: Re: [PR middle-end/18628] do not fold to label load from tablejump
to reg
On 9 Mar 2005, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
This patch is meant to implement suggestion #3 proposed to fix the bug
by Roger Sayle
--- Additional Comments From delarosa at ilstechnology dot com 2005-03-09
16:23 ---
Does this:
sun.io.ByteToCharConverter not
found in gnu.gcj.runtime.SystemClassLoader{urls=[file:./],
mean the the gcj runtime library has no sun.io.ByteToCharConverter ? If so, is
there a way to add
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
16:32 ---
4.1 Gives a better error message already:
t.m: In function -[Foo quux:]:
t.m:7: error: expected { before end
t.m: At top level:
t.m:7: error: void must be the only parameter
Though the last error
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
16:33 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Does this:
sun.io.ByteToCharConverter not
found in gnu.gcj.runtime.SystemClassLoader{urls=[file:./],
Hmm, this seems wrong, no body should be refering to a sun. class really.
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
17:03 ---
Subject: Bug 16859
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-09 17:03:39
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog decl.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
17:05 ---
Subject: Bug 16859
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-09 17:05:13
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-03-09 17:06
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-03-09
17:17 ---
Marek, is this bug fixed then? Can we close it?
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-03-09 17:47
---
Thats a bug in upstream, the jdbc connector/application here. No application
should access sun classes. File a bug against them. Even SUN says: Don't use
them directly. We did the same successfully for a bunch of
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20376
--- Additional Comments From marekm at amelek dot gda dot pl 2005-03-09
17:55 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Marek, is this bug fixed then? Can we close it?
Fixed for the AVR, but the middle-end may still generate these shift by 0
insns - not sure if all other targets handle
--- Additional Comments From delarosa at ilstechnology dot com 2005-03-09
17:56 ---
Thanks for the response. What is upstream ? Is that a gcj component ? Where
exactly should I post the bug ? On the meantime, I plan to extract that
particular class and compile it in with the
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-03-09 18:06
---
Other Java compilers generate accessor methods for calls to private methods in
a nested class, the real bug here is that GCJ doesn't do this - thats why the
javac bytecode works fine on gij but gcj-produced
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-03-09 18:22
---
gcj is generating code which references private members across class boundaries,
which isn't legal at the class/VM level. To fix this, we need to generate
package-private accessor methods when a private member
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
18:35 ---
Subject: Bug 20208
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-09 18:35:48
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog pt.c
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-03-09 18:40
---
Upstream is the provider of your jdbc provider. DB/2 in your case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20394
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
18:51 ---
Subject: Bug 20208
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-09 18:51:43
Modified files:
gcc/cp :
--- Additional Comments From delarosa at ilstechnology dot com 2005-03-09
18:52 ---
Hello, sorry for being a pest. You indicated a company called upstream which
provides the jdbc driver for IBM. Can you please share their web url ? I tried
several searches but none made sense. Many
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
18:53 ---
Fixed in GCC 4.0.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--
Bug 2892 depends on bug 20208, which changed state.
Bug 20208 Summary: [4.0/4.1 Regression] No array-to-pointer decay happens for
template functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20208
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
18:57 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Hello, sorry for being a pest. You indicated a company called upstream which
provides the jdbc driver for IBM. Can you please share their web url ? I tried
several searches but
It would be much easier for packagers if GNU Crypto were included directly in
libgcj.
--
Summary: GNU Crypto should be merged into libgcj
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
19:05 ---
Subject: Bug 20338
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-09 19:04:55
Modified files:
gcc/java : ChangeLog decl.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
19:07 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2002-12/msg00137.html
Confirmed, there might be a newer discussion that I cannot find right now.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From delarosa at ilstechnology dot com 2005-03-09
19:07 ---
Ok. Thanks, that is what I thought originally. Yes, I will contact IBM but I
suspect it won't be speedy -- on the meantime I will extract the class from
rt.jar or wherever it is -- and proceed with the
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
19:52 ---
I almost think this is a C++ front-end bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|debug
--- Additional Comments From jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09 20:10
---
Severity raised to critical since it breaks debugging of all Java programs
(gdb dies when loading libgcj).
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20350
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
20:28 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] GCC produces wrong dwarf2
output that breaks gdb
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 20:10 +, jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From jbuck at
--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09 20:32
---
Joern's patch fixes the regression on mainline.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg00777.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-03-09
20:50 ---
can the same patch be applied to 4.0 branch as well?
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com 2005-03-09
20:55 ---
I only noticed the regression on 4.1, things look fine to me on 4.0 (for both
zaxpy.f and Andrew's C example).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20372
There are a number of places in the compiler that assume that
TRULY_NOOP_TRUNCATION will always be true.
--
Summary: TRULY_NOOP_TRUNCATION ignored
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity:
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||20396
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17652
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
21:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=8370)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8370action=view)
proposed fix (of known problems)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20396
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
21:20 ---
Subject: Bug 20389
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-09 21:20:44
Modified files:
libjava:
Example code:
class A {
};
class B : A {
};
class C : B {
public:
int c(A *a) { return 7; }
};
int main() {
A a;
C c;
return c.c( a );
}
Gives the error message:
g++ main.cc
main.cpp:1: `class A' is inaccessible
main.cpp:9: within
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
21:49 ---
No gcc is correct because the type A is interjected into B. and is private as
the base class is private.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
22:11 ---
Subject: Bug 20389
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-09 22:11:34
Modified files:
libjava: ChangeLog
libjava/java/io:
--- Additional Comments From delarosa at ilstechnology dot com 2005-03-09
22:36 ---
Hello,
Tried to extract a bunch of classes fron Sun's rt.jar and I ended it when it
needed some internal class sun.io.CharacterEconding$2 ... So, does anybody have
some experience with a jdbc driver for
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
22:41 ---
Hmm, I thought I tested 4.0.0, I must have messed up. so closing as fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
22:44 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-03-09
23:33 ---
This looks very much like a front end bug. The
along parameter gets the wrong value.
Look at this:
$ cat test_spread.f90
program test_spread
implicit none
integer, parameter :: N = 1000
--- Additional Comments From kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
23:58 ---
I'm taking a look at the uses of MEM_READONLY_P, though I'm not
sure which one has the similar issue. It looks that modified_in_p
has the same problem with modified_between_p.
BTW, it's better to change
Configured with: ../gcccvsmain/gcc/configure --prefix=/usr/local/test
--enable-languages=c,c++,java
Running on FC3
$ cat mauve-libjava
JDK1.0
JDK1.1
!java.beans
$ make KEYS=libjava check
results in:
.
.
.
CLASSPATH=.:. gcj -fassume-compiled -g -O2 -c -o
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-03-10
00:12 ---
CC'ing RTH since he's the one who removed RTX_UNCHANGING.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-10
00:12 ---
Subject: Bug 20314
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-10 00:12:32
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog gimplify.c stmt.c
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-10
00:18 ---
Subject: Bug 20314
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-10 00:18:16
Modified files:
gcc:
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-10 00:19
---
Fixed in 4.0/4.1.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-03-10 00:52
---
Fixed with the new verifier.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-03-10 00:53
---
Fixed with the new verifier.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From jbrandmeyer at earthlink dot net 2005-03-10
00:59 ---
uClibc has added these functions to SVN, and they will be available in the next
release of uClibc. However, their presence is still a configurable option - the
user can configure uClibc to not include
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-10
01:08 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
uClibc has added these functions to SVN, and they will be available in the
next
release of uClibc. However, their presence is still a configurable option -
the
user can
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-03-10 01:29
---
This is failing because the bytecode in this .jar really is broken:
public class Test
{
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
{
Class f =
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
