--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
08:25 ---
Subject: Bug 22262
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-01 08:25:09
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
gcc/config/i386:
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
08:25 ---
Subject: Bug 17441
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-01 08:25:12
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
--- Additional Comments From sieb at sscd dot de 2005-07-01 08:42 ---
Compiling qt-embedded-free-3.3.4 yields a similar ICE:
sh4-linux-g++ -v -save-temps -c -pipe -DQWS -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -Wall -W
-O2 -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DQT_SHARED -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT
--- Additional Comments From sieb at sscd dot de 2005-07-01 08:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=9185)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9185action=view)
Preprocessed source for qt--embedded-3.3.4 ICE
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22250
--- Additional Comments From marek dot rouchal at infineon dot com
2005-07-01 09:04 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Can you try the following:
CFLAGS=-m32 -O2 -g BOOT_CFLAGS=-m32 -O2 -g STAGE1_CFLAGS=-m32 -g
I spent some more thoughts on this: My desired result could be achieved by
--- Additional Comments From chris at bubblescope dot net 2005-07-01 09:12
---
on 4.0.0, ppc-darwin I don't see this problem.
On x86-cygwin 3.4.4 I do, but I don't think it has anything to do with map, or
net, or anything.
Consider the following program below. It prints:
bat:bat
on
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||chris at bubblescope dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22265
--- Additional Comments From chris at bubblescope dot net 2005-07-01 09:47
---
After a little thought (sorry, should have done it before), this bug all comes
down to the order of
execution of function parameters, which I believe is undefined?
BTW, in case I wasn't clear enough in
--- Additional Comments From erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi 2005-07-01
09:49 ---
A discussion on the mailing list on this bug here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-06/msg00485.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22146
--- Additional Comments From sieb at sscd dot de 2005-07-01 10:23 ---
Cross compiler built with --enable-checking gives
kernel/qdnd_qws.cpp: In member function `void
QDropEvent::_ZThn12_N10QDropEventD1Ev()':
kernel/qdnd_qws.cpp:157: internal compiler error: in pool_alloc, at
The attached code is compiled OK at -O0 level, but at -O1 it produces bad
results.
The bug occurs somewhere in expression:
((a)==INT_MIN (b)==-1)?(INT_MIN):((a)/(b))
where a and b are ints.
a is not INT_MIN and b is not -1, so division shall be performed. But at -O1
INT_MIN is returned
--- Additional Comments From A dot Salwa at osmosys dot tv 2005-07-01
10:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=9186)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9186action=view)
full preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22266
--- Additional Comments From A dot Salwa at osmosys dot tv 2005-07-01
10:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=9187)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9187action=view)
a simple shell script that runs test with various compilation flags
--
--- Additional Comments From A dot Salwa at osmosys dot tv 2005-07-01
10:44 ---
It looks like a 3.4/4.0 regression - it works fine on gcc 3.4.3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22266
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-07-01 11:17
---
Yes, this is not a bug. For further information, grep for sequence point in
the standard, in particular under section 1.9.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
11:39 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
This fix has not made it to the gcc_4_0 branch, and the problem still exists
in
gcc4.0.0. It is trivially recreated using the same test code:
the bug is not a regression, so it
--- Additional Comments From sieb at sscd dot de 2005-07-01 11:50 ---
For the qt-embedded-3.3.4 case:
Cross compiler built with --enable-checking gives:
dialogs/qcolordialog.cpp: In member function `void
QWellArray::_ZThn8_N10QWellArrayD1Ev()':
dialogs/qcolordialog.cpp:221: internal
--- Additional Comments From algorithmus at gmail dot com 2005-07-01 12:42
---
| But it will not warn about this testcase as we have array[index] but that
is filed as PR 16202.
I don't think you're explaining that we cannot warn. Are you?
I can't understand what Andrew means. I
/* C optimization error with string.h on
ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
(also occurs on alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu, but not on other
architectures that I have tried)
% gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: /usr/local/gcc-4.0.0/src/gcc-4.0.0/configure
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-07-01 12:58 ---
This has nothing to do with gcc. This is invalid C.
--
What|Removed |Added
I use the libiberty c++ name demangler for unmangling symbols. Since I don't
know whether the symbols are really mangled, the demangler will sometimes see
names which are either mangled with a completely different mangler or even not
mangled at all.
This is quite a good stress test for the
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
14:00 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
For cris-elf too, likely most/all (cross-)targets.
i686-pc-linux-gnu native bootstrap is also affected:
(SHLIB_LINK=' ./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -isystem
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
14:26 ---
Subject: Bug 22264
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-01 14:26:19
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog diagnostic.c
Log
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
14:26 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
14:29 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
| But it will not warn about this testcase as we have array[index] but
that
is filed as PR 16202.
I don't think you're explaining that we cannot warn. Are you?
I am
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
14:29 ---
*** Bug 22248 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11751
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
14:33 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From osv at javad dot ru 2005-07-01 14:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=9188)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9188action=view)
Fixes symmetric case as well
Though previous patch fixes this particular PR, I've encountered similar ICE in
--- Additional Comments From sb at biallas dot net 2005-07-01 15:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=9189)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9189action=view)
proposed patch
Patch against my local copy of cp-demangle.c
Should apply cleanly to the CVS version of libiberty.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22268
On Jul 1, 2005, at 11:22 AM, Neil Peterson wrote:
Dear sir/madam,
I'm having a runtime problem with the executable generated by GCC
4.0.0.
This problem has been tested on Mac OS/X 10.4 running GCC 4.0.0, and
Linux (Redhat 9) also running GCC 4.0.0 (and confirmed on Linux using
4.0.1
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
15:52 ---
You are using an unitialized variable and putting it together piece wise, This
is undefined hence the
warning with -Wall.
--
What|Removed |Added
This is reduced from PR 22266.
int printf(const char*, ...);
int main(int argv, char*argc) {
int d1;
int d2;
int s1, s2;
int b;
((d1)=(int)0xL, (d1)|=((int)(short)(0x344))16);
((d1)=(int)0xUL, (d1)|=(int)(unsigned short)(0x4567));
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
16:04 ---
The ICE is:
t2.c: In function main:
t2.c:2: internal compiler error: tree check: expected ssa_name, have
integer_cst in should_transpose, at
tree-ssa-reassoc.c:411
Please submit a full bug report,
with
--- Additional Comments From peb at mppmu dot mpg dot de 2005-07-01 16:24
---
(In reply to comment #7)
This is a known libtool bug. There's nothing the library
can do about it. I'm not closing this PR now because it
does continue to still be a problem.
This bug is still present
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
16:27 ---
Actually I think this is worse than any can think. The problem is that we have
a VUSE on the sqrt which
is wrong, we should have a V_MAY_DEF.
With an optimized (non bootstrapped) compiler, we get the
A missing procedure declaration in test.ads causes test.adb to generate an
ice. Compiler output is:
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 3.4.2 20040901 (prerelease) (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure sinfo.adb:2479|
| Error detected at test.adb:27:16
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
16:30 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
in reply to this. On powerpc-darwin we get the right answer but on
i686-pc-linux-gnu, we don't, I
have no idea why.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22037
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
16:36 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
in reply to this. On powerpc-darwin we get the right answer but on
i686-pc-linux-gnu, we don't, I
have no idea why.
Ignore all this talk, the reason
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
16:39 ---
Subject: Bug 22268
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-01 16:39:36
Modified files:
libiberty : ChangeLog cp-demangle.c
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-07-01 16:42 ---
Thanks for the test case and the patch. I have committed a slightly different
patch, which should also fix the problem.
--
What|Removed |Added
There are no builtin defines that tell what sdata mode is active.
For calling convention only _CALL_SYSV is defined even when EABI is in fact
active.
I'm going to provide a patch that adds more builtin defines.
--
Summary: No builtin defines to tell SDATA mode.
--- Additional Comments From osv at javad dot ru 2005-07-01 17:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=9190)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9190action=view)
Support for more builtin defines.
Adds support for the following builting defines: _CALL_EABI, _SDATA_NONE,
Hi,
I encounter an endless loop during the compile of all-target-libstdc++-v3
It goes like
Adding multilib support to Makefile in .
multidirs=pthread power powerpc pthread/power pthread/powerpc
with_multisubdir=
Running configure in multilib subdirs pthread power powerpc pthread/power
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
17:47 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
GCC build triplet|3.3.4/5 |powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0
GCC host triplet|AIX 4.3.3
--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2005-07-01 19:04 ---
Fixed by this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg02278.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Keywords|
--- Additional Comments From geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
19:10 ---
I have a patch for the compiler here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg00049.html
which will fix this problem.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
19:10 ---
Still happen as of 4.1.0 20050622.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21687
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|0x8000/-1 is wrong |0x8000/-1 is wrong in
||java
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Keywords|
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
19:16 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22071 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
19:16 ---
*** Bug 22096 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22071
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
19:17 ---
Is anyone still looking at this? Do things work as they are supposed
to on mainline now?
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
19:24 ---
This was fixed on the mainline and 4.0.0.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
19:30 ---
Ulrich, do you know if this still fails on s390-linux-gnu?
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
19:30 ---
No feedback in 3 months (T-10 days).
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21935
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
19:33 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
19:33 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
19:36 ---
This is still invalid as you are going passed the bounds which is undefined.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
19:36 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
19:39 ---
Confirmed, only a regression on the 3.4 branch.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2005-07-01 19:42 ---
That's certainly prettier than my header changes.
I'll give it a shot. Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21951
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
19:45 ---
Subject: Bug 22071
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-01 19:45:24
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-ssa-structalias.c
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
19:50 ---
: Search converges between 2003-09-04-trunk (#342) and 2003-09-05-trunk (#343).
That is at -O2, -O3 we always accepted the code.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21659
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
19:59 ---
: Search converges between 2004-05-11-trunk (#454) and 2004-05-14-trunk (#455).\
: Search converges between 2003-06-25-ssa (#14) and 2003-06-26-ssa (#15).
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
20:01 ---
I was passing with 4.0.0 20041211.
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-06-14
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
20:02 ---
: Search converges between 2004-05-11-trunk (#454) and 2004-05-14-trunk (#455).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21291
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
20:02 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
20:05 ---
: Search converges between 2002-12-14-trunk (#159) and 2002-12-29-trunk (#160).
Looks like the new parser caused this.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
20:15 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--
Bug 22096 depends on bug 22071, which changed state.
Bug 22071 Summary: [4.1 regression] ICE in first_vi_for_offset, at
tree-ssa-structalias.c:2506
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22071
What|Old Value |New Value
I think that this error message is a bug in gfortran. I don't see anythink
forbidden in fortran 95 to explain it.
gfortran -c mod_lecfich.f90
In file mod_lecfich.f90:32
character(len=len(ligne)) :: comment
1
Error: Dummy argument 'ligne' at (1) cannot be INTENT(OUT)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
20:51 ---
Confirmed, reduced testcase:
subroutine lecligne (ligne)
character(len=*), dimension(:),intent(out) :: ligne
character(len=len(ligne)) :: comment
end subroutine lecligne
--
What
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
20:54 ---
I think I have a fix, waiting for word from Daniel Berlin to double check the
intent of the code.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01 21:44
---
One option: have gcc/Makefile stamp-as target test build and output
appropriate script to MS Windows BATCH file as.bat.
*) case $build in \
*mingw32*) echo 'XXX' as.bat \
... ;;
*) echo
--- Additional Comments From jp dot pozzi at izzop dot net 2005-07-01
21:53 ---
My 68K machine is out of order, I have to have the powersupply repaired
and I get into problems to find a new supply
I think I will get it next week or so ... I hope ... so I can't
give any new
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
21:58 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
22:01 ---
Subject: Bug 22269
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-01 22:01:17
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-ssa-reassoc.c
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18879
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
22:11 ---
Fixed in 4.0.1 and above.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--
Bug 19292 depends on bug 18879, which changed state.
Bug 18879 Summary: [4.0 only] ? not supported in namelist input
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18879
What|Old Value |New Value
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=951
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4945
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21064
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21036
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20285
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18990
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13257
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16991
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20367
--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01 22:57
---
This is a bug in the AIX assembler. The host/target-specific installation notes
for AIX specify the level of assembler PTF that must be installed to build GCC:
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-02
00:10 ---
Not yet.
I think my plan was to fix it by using the classpath version of this class.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21637
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-02
00:57 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20689 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-02
00:58 ---
*** Bug 20709 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20689
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-02
01:00 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-02
01:06 ---
Fixed in 4.0.1 and above:
test.adb:26:16: no selector Destroy_Stuff for type Safe_Object defined at
test.ads:14
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-02
01:13 ---
You are having some kind of hardware problem if you could build 3.4 with only C
and then cannot with
C++ enabled and it is failing in libgcc.
--
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
